green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Boyer v. Commonwealth
Cf., Pickering v. Board of Education (teacher’s criticism of fiscal policies of Board of Education held to be protected under First Amendment); Pilkington v. Bevilacqua, 439 F. Supp. 465 (D.B.I. 1977), aff’d, 590 F.2d 386 (1st Cir. 1979) (mental health administrator’s criticism of policies detrimental to unit he directed protected); Wright v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 45 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 117 , 404 A.2d 792 (1979) (prison guard’s criticism of prison board and warden after escaped prisoner killed police officer protected); but cf., Roseman v. Indiana University of Pe…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Doody
See State v. Taylor, 112 Ariz. 68, 81 , 537 P.2d 938, 951 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976) (characterizing seven-hour interrogation as “long” but upholding the statements as voluntary in the absence of evidence that a lack of food and sleep contributed to the statements).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Krum
See State v. Taylor, 112 Ariz. 68, 84 , 537 P.2d 938, 954 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watters v. City of Philadelphia
See Roseman v. Indiana Univ. of Pa., 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976) (significant if speaker "called into question the integrity of the person immediately in charge of running a department").
discussed
Cited "see"
Watters v. City of Philadelphia
See Roseman v. Indiana Univ. of Pa., 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3d Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976) (significant if speaker “called into question the integrity of the person immediately in charge of running a department”).
cited
Cited "see"
Costanzo v. United States
See United States v. Franzese, 525 F.2d 27, 32 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976); United States v. Manfredi, 447 F.Supp. 847, 850-51 (S.D.N.Y.1978). 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary John Crosby
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 513 F.2d 319, 321 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayberry v. Dees
See Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania at Indiana, 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3d Cir. 1975) (“.. . we have concluded that plaintiff’s communications fall outside the First Amendment’s protection.”), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976). 40 We are loath to say that there was no First Amendment dimension whatever to utterances by Mayberry so that, even had the evidence sufficed to support a finding that, if Mayberry’s criticisms had not been made, Fernandez demonstrably was prepared to recommend him favorably for tenure, still Mayberry could not have …
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1981
See Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania at Indiana, 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3d Cir. 1975) ("... we have concluded that plaintiff's communications fall outside the First Amendment's protection."), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976). 40 We are loath to say that there was no First Amendment dimension whatever to utterances by Mayberry so that, even had the evidence sufficed to support a finding that, if Mayberry's criticisms had not been made, Fernandez demonstrably was prepared to recommend him favorably for tenure, still Mayberry could not have recovered.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sanchez
See State v. Taylor, 112 Ariz. 68 , 537 P.2d 938 (1975), cert. den., 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976) — (permission to reopen case); State v. Foster, 121 Ariz. 287 , 589 P.2d 1319 (App. 1978) — (granting continuance).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pilkington v. Bevilacqua
See Roseman v. Indiana U. of Penn. at Indiana, 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (private communication receives less protection than public forum communication); Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 412 F.Supp. 910 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff’d, 546 F.2d 560 (3rd Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Endress v. Brookdale Community College
See Roseman v. Indiana, 520 F. 2d 1364, 1367 (3 Cir.1975), cert. den. 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 329 (1976); Connealy v. Walsh, 412 F. Supp. 146, 154 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pizzuti v. United States
See also United States v. Franzese, 525 F.2d 27, 31 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976); D’Ercole v. United States, 361 F.2d 211, 212 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 610 , 17 L.Ed.2d 454 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldassare v. County of Bergen
See id.; see also Roseman v. *200 Ind. Univ. of Pa. at Ind., 520 F.2d 1364, 1368 (3d Cir.1975) (upholding dismissal of First Amendment claim when speaker’s expression “called into question the integrity of the person immediately in charge of running a department”), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca11 1990
See, e.g., Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hosp., 147 Ariz. 370 , 710 P.2d 1025, 1041-42 (1985); Nager v. Lad'n Dad Slacks, 148 Ga.App. 401 , 251 S.E.2d 330, 333 (1978); see also Roseman v. Hassler, 382 F.Supp. 1328, 1340-41 (W.D.Pa.1974) (applying Pennsylvania law), aff'd sub nom., Roseman v. Indiana University, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976); cf. Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33, 39 , 36 S.Ct. 7, 9 , 60 L.Ed. 131 (1915) ("The fact that the employment is at the will of the parties, respectively, does not make it one at the will of…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Hayden v. United States
See also United States v. Franzese, 525 F.2d 27, 31 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976); D’Ercole v. United States, 361 F.2d 211, 212 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 610 , 17 L.Ed.2d 454 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis M. Fiorillo v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons
(2×)
See, e.g., Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 , 1368 n. 11 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976) (if employee “had convinced local news media that her grievance ... was newsworthy, entirely different considerations would come into play”); McKinley v. City of Eloy, 705 F.2d 1110, 1115 (9th Cir.1983) (“plaintiff’s speech was specifically and purposefully directed to the public both through city council meetings and a television interview”); Acanfora v. Board of Education of Montgomery County, 491 F.2d 498, 500-01 (4t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turpin
United States v. Emery, 682 F.2d 493, 499 [8] (5th Cir.1982) cert. den., 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 615 (1982); see also United States v. Davis, 513 F.2d 319 (5th Cir.1975), cert. den., 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1129 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederic U. Boehm v. Colonel Thomas G. Foster, III
See Pickering, supra, 391 U.S. at 570, n.3 , 18 S.Ct. at 1735, n.3; see also Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 ; Chitwood v. Feaster, 468 F.2d 359, 361 (4th Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tacho
See also State v. Taylor, 112 Ariz. 68 , 537 P.2d 938 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976).
Taylor
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 75-5794.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.