green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Universal Amusements Co. v. General Cinema Corp.
Gibbons, 704 F.2d at 797 ; but see Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola, 515 F.2d 835, 851 (5th Cir.1975) cert. denied 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthews v. CTI Container Transport International Inc.
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 314 F.Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd in relevant part, 515 F.2d 173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association, 636 F.2d 755 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 784 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.1986), rev’d on other grounds, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1519 , 95 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency
Similarly, “ordinances survive a substantive due process challenge if they were designed to accomplish an objective within the government’s police power, and if a rational relationship existed between the provisions and purpose of the ordinances.” Scott v. City of Sioux City, 736 F.2d 1207, 1216 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1864 , 85 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); see Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897 , 906 & n. 11 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose
Similarly, "ordinances survive a substantive due process challenge if they were designed to accomplish an objective within the government's police power, and if a rational relationship existed between the provisions and purpose of the ordinances." Scott v. City of Sioux City, 736 F.2d 1207, 1216 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1864 , 85 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); see Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897 , 906 & n. 11 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976). 26 Here, the developers have n…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Carr
See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect.
cited
Cited "see"
Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of Honolulu
See Construction Industry Association v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897, 906 (9th Cir.1975), *944 cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olympia Equipment Leasing Company, Alfco Telecommunications Company, and Abraham Feldman v. Western Union Telegraph Company
(2×)
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 314 F.Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y.1970) ($75 million bond to secure a judgment of $145 million), aff’d in relevant part, 515 F.2d 173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 (1976); cf. International Telemeter Corp. v. Hamlin International Corp., 754 F.2d 1492, 1495 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Defendants
(2×)
See generally Sulmeyer v. Coca-Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835, 841 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5th Cir.1969) (en banc) 10 Even assuming that the defendants' argument might have a reasonable basis in the law, it seems unlikely that their contention could prevail because they did not offer to the district judge any factual support for their argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Systemized of New England, Inc. v. Scm, Incorporated
See Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., [ 515 F.2d 835 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976)] at 846 n. 17; 5A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 50.08 at 50-88 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Clyde Eugene Hill v. Charles Zimmerman, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and District Attorney for Dauphin County
See Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Cpc International Inc.
(2×)
Accord Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835, 846 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); House of Koscot Development Corp. v. American Line Cosmetics, Inc., 468 F.2d 64, 67-68 (5th Cir. 1972). 12 In this case, CPC's motion for directed verdict alleged, inter alia, that: "with respect to monopolization there is no evidence that CPC possessed monopoly power in any relevant market, much less that CPC deliberately acquired or maintained such power." CPC's subsequent j. n. o. v. motion is, in our view, only a more detailed version of this "no evidence…
cited
Cited "see"
Superturf, Inc. v. Monsanto Company
See Sulmeyer v. CocaCola Co., 515 F.2d 835, 852 (5th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); Semke v. Enid Auto.
discussed
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Town of Cherokee
See Housing Authority of City of Prichard v. Malloy, Ala., 341 So.2d 708 (1977); ARCP 50(b); see generally Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Union Mechling Corporation v. Nathan Carmadelle
La Fever, Inc. v. All-Star Insurance Corporation, 571 F.2d 1367, 1368 (5th Cir. 1978) (citations omitted); see Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835, 852 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); see also Del Rio Distributing, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 589 F.2d 176, 178-79 (5th Cir. 1979) (denial of a motion for new trial based on changes in the law reversible on appeal only for prejudicial error or manifest injustice).
discussed
Cited "see"
H. C. Blackwell Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Kenworth Truck Company, a Division of Paccar, Inc., a Corporation
See Sulmeyer v. Coca-Cola Co., 515 F.2d 835 *107 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); Alman Brothers Farm Feed Mill, Inc. v. Diamond Laboratories, Inc., 437 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
James v. Ball
See Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897, 904 (9th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
James v. Ball
See Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897, 904 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
Wincamp Partnership v. Anne Arundel County, Md.
(3×)
See Construction Industry Ass’n v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897, 903-05 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Goodsons & Co. v. National American Corp.
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 515 F.2d 173,179 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Heatransfer Corporation v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G.
See Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Company, 515 F.2d 835, 844 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 .
cited
Cited "see"
Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.
See Sulmeyer v. Coca Cola Co., 5 Cir. 1975, 515 F.2d 835 , cert. denied, 1976, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schenck v. City of Hudson Village
See, e.g., Construction Ind. Ass’n of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, 522 F.2d 897 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1148 , 47 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976) (San Francisco suburb which grew 25 percent in two years).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce Church, Inc. v. Superior Court
See also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 515 F.2d 173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976); C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Horner
See e. g., Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Brown
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Veltre
See also, Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90, 92-93 , 343 A.2d 669, 670 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178, 188 , 335 A.2d 698, 703 (1975); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wymer v. Wymer (In Re Wymer)
(2×)
See, e.g., Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 515 F.2d 173 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976) (approving the use of a secured letter of credit in lieu of a supersedeas bond).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Darlene GUSE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See also, Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 515 F.2d 173, 178, 179 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ben Chaney v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of the Florida Department of Offender Rehabilitation
See also Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1976) (minor’s confession held inadmissible because he did not receive opportunity to contact parent; failure of minor to request parent held irrelevant); Lewis v. State, Ind., 288 N.E.2d 138 (1972) (same). 6 But see State v. Young, 220 Kan. 541 , 552 P.2d 905, 916 (1976) (honoring minor’s request to contact father, while the “better practice,” is not constitutionally required).
Pennsylvania
v.
McCutchen
v.
McCutchen
No. 75-845.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in-forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied, it appearing that the judgment below rests on adequate state grounds.