green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Edward Gregory v. Donald W. Wyrick
(2×)
But see United States v. Young, 512 F.2d 321 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennison ETSITTY, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Young, 512 F.2d 321, 323 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976); United States v. Cassidy, 571 F.2d 534, 536 (10th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Cody
See United States v. Rose, 525 F.2d 1026, 1027 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Rosario
(2×)
See Jackson v. Statler Foundation, 496 F.2d 623 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 927 , 95 S.Ct. 1124 , 43 L.Ed.2d 397 (1975); see United States v. Bradshaw, 515 F.2d 360 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 (1976). 19 The question of whether probable cause exists to make an arrest in a situation such as the instant one has been addressed by this Court and by others on a number of occasions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Young, 512 F.2d 321 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976); United States v. Wolford, 444 F.2d 876 (D.C.Cir.1971); Smith v. United States, 407 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 966 , 89 S.Ct. 2113 , 23 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969); DeHerrera v. United States, 339 F.2d 587 (10th Cir. 1964); Poindexter v. United States, 139 F.2d 158 (8th Cir. 1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Patton
See United States v. Young, 512 F.2d 321 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976); State v. Finch, 293 N.C. 132 , 235 S.E.2d 819 (1977); Metallo v. State, 10 Md.App. 76 , 267 A.2d 804 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Reed, 526 F.2d 740, 743 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Reed, 526 F.2d 740, 743 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. SIFTSOFF
See also Ingram v. State, 703 P.2d 415, 422 (Alaska App.1985). 5 . 596 P.2d 1154 (Alaska 1979). 6 . 533 F.2d 578 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roland R. Childress, A/K/A Rocky
(2×)
Chatwin v. United States, 326 U.S. 455, 459 , 66 S.Ct. 233, 235 , 90 L.Ed. 198 (1946); United States v. Lewis, 662 F.2d 1087, 1088 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 955 , 102 S.Ct. 1464 , 71 L.Ed.2d 672 (1982); see also United States v. Young, 512 F.2d 321, 323 (4th Cir.1975) (noting that “it is clear that Congress has made unlawful much more than strict kidnapping as defined at common law”), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen Clifton Benton
See, e. g., United States v. Harvey, 526 F.2d 529 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (1976) and case collected in 2 Wigmore on Evidence, § 390 at 423-25 n. 2 (Chadbourn rev’d. ed. 1979). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar McInnis and Patricia Parada
Compare, e.g., United States v. Young, 4 Cir. 1975, 512 F.2d 321 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 L.Ed.2d 362 (kidnapping at Washington National Airport). 13 The alleged plan did not encompass taking or holding Villanueva against his will and then transporting him in foreign commerce.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pollard v. State
See also, United States v. Robinson, (1976) 174 U.S.App.D.C. 351 , 533 F.2d 578 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1432 , 47 LEd.2d 362.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mathis
Under Finch , an illegal arrest will lead to suppression of identification testimony only if it “created a likelihood that the pretrial confrontation was so ‘conducive to irreparable mistaken identification as to offend fundamental standards of decency, fairness and *629 justice.’ ” Id. at 139 , 235 S.E. 2d at 823 , quoting State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1, 9 , 203 S.E. 2d 10, 16 (1974); see also United States v. Young, 512 F. 2d 321 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 (1976), and other cases cited and relied on in Finch; but see Crews v. United States, --- A. 2d ---, 23 Crim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anne Lamont
See e. g., United States v. Reed, 526 F.2d 740, 743 (CA 2 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976), and United States v. Curcio, 279 F.2d 681, 682 (CA 2), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reed
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-5902.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1976.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.