green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…we must view disciplinary proceedings as judicial rather than administrative in nature
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Williams v. Pryor
But see Carey, 431 U.S. at 718 n. 2, 97 S.Ct. at 2033 n. 2 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (“While we have not ruled on every conceivable regulation affecting such conduct the facial constitutional validity of criminal statutes prohibiting certain consensual acts has been ‘definitively’ established.”) (citing Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976), summarily aff'g 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975)).
cited
Cited "but see"
Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Whaley
But see id. at 718 n.2 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (citing Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976), summarily aff’g, 403 F.Supp. 1195 (E.D.Va. 1975) ).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Whaley
But see id. at 718 n.2 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (citing Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976), summarily aff'g, 403 F.Supp. 1195 (E.D.Va.1975)) While this court has stated in the context of a prostitution statute that "(w)e do not agree that the right to privacy extends to all sexual practices performed in private including the commercialized sexual activities regulated in this case," J.B.K., Inc. v. Caron, 600 F.2d 710, 711 (8th Cir. 1979), a trend in recent cases has been to expand the right of privacy in this area.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Willie R. Smith v. Everett E. Price, Chief of Police, Athens, Georgia, and City of Athens Personnel Board, City of Athens, Georgia
(2×)
But cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976) (mem.), aff'g 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975) (sodomy); Hollenbaugh v. Carnegie Free Library, 436 F.Supp. 1328 (W.D.Pa.1977) (fornication), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1374 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1052 , 99 S.Ct. 734 , 58 L.Ed.2d 713 (1978).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marc Feldman v. William C. Gardner Edward J. Hickey, Jr. v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
(2×)
we must view disciplinary proceedings as judicial rather than administrative in nature
discussed
Cited "see"
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Dvorak
See Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 195 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976) (per curiam); Razatos v. Colorado Supreme Court, 549 F.Supp. 798, 801 (D.Colo.1982), aff'd 746 F.2d 1429 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2019 , 85 L.Ed.2d 301 (1985): If there is no due process right to appellate review, it is difficult to perceive how due process could nevertheless mandate any type of standard for appellate review.
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. Legal Advertising Committee
See Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 197 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd without opinion, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anonymous v. Grievance Committee
Moreover, the petitioner’s contention that the denial of his request for a hearing before the full Committee deprived him of due process is without merit, as he clearly received notice of the nature of the complaint against him and was granted a hearing at which he could appear and present witnesses (see, e.g., Matter of Jagiela, 217 AD2d 104, 107 ; see generally, Mildner v Gulotta, 405 F Supp 182 , affd 425 US 901 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Union Of Flight Attendants v. United States Department Of Transportation
See Bowman Transportation v. Arkansas Best-Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 441 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh'g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), aff'd 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1488 , 47 L.Ed.2d 750 (1976). 21 The labor parties insist that the department's change of policy is not only arbitrary and capricious, but that it flies in the face of the expressed will of Congress.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Union of Flight Attendants v. United States Department of Transportation
See Bowman Transportation v. Arkansas Best-Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 441 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956 , 95 S.Ct. 1340 , 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), aff'd 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1488 , 47 L.Ed.2d 750 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pattberg v. Pattberg
The Supreme Court has not yet recognized a fundamental interest in cohabiting or living openly with a member of the opposite sex, although the Supreme Court’s recognition of a right of privacy in the penumbras of the Bill of Rights (Griswold v Connecticut, 381 US 479 [1965]; Roe v Wade, 410 US 113 [1973], reh denied 410 US 959 [1973]; see, Doe v Commonwealth’s Attorney, 403 F Supp 1199 [US Dist Ct, ED Va 1975], affd mem 425 US 901 [1976], reh denied 425 US 985 [1976]) and expansion of the privacy right protections to unmarried individuals (see, Eisenstadt v Baird, 405 US 438 [1972]) has be…
discussed
Cited "see"
Razatos v. Colorado Supreme Court
See Colo.R.Civ.P. 241.15(c) (Supp.1983) 3 Raddatz based his constitutional challenges on the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and on Article III 4 We recognize that the opportunity to hear and observe witnesses may be crucial in the appraisal of testimony, see Wingo v. Wedding, 418 U.S. 461 , 94 S.Ct. 2842 , 41 L.Ed.2d 879 (1974), yet "its importance diminishes when facts are developed and inferences ... drawn without reference to credibility." Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 195 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976). "[A] disciplinary hearin…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re G.L.S., in the Matter of G.L.S.
See Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 195 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd Levin v. Gulotta, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976) which states: First, while we agree that the opportunity to hear and to observe the demeanor of witnesses is an essential element in the weighing and appraising of testimony, see Wingo v. Wedding, 418 U.S. 461 , 94 S.Ct. 2842, 2850 , 41 L.Ed.2d 879 (1974), its importance diminishes when the facts are developed and inferences may be drawn without reference to credibility.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lutz v. United States
(2×)
See Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 403 F.Supp. 1199, 1200 (E.D.Va. 1975), aff'd mem., 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976); Stewart v. United States, D.C.App., 364 A.2d 1205 , 1207 & n.2 (1976); Garcia, supra at 224 ; Carson, supra at 331-32 ; Riley, supra at 232 & n.5. .The government filed the following information against appellant: SEXUAL SOLICITATION — in that [s]he unlawfully invited, enticed, persuaded and addressed for the purpose of inviting, enticing and persuading for the purpose of prostitution and an immoral and lewd purpose, Off.
discussed
Cited "see"
MATTER OF BELSKY v. New York City Transit Auth.
So long as the *910 body charged with imposition of disciplinary sanctions has made an independent appraisal of the entire record compiled by its duly appointed hearing officer, as respondent has done here, a public employee has received all that the due process clause demands (Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, supra; see Mildner v Gulotta, 405 F Supp 182, 194-196 , affd 425 US 901 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Behnke
See Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 191-92 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d mem., 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976); In re Echeles, 430 F.2d 347, 349-50 (7th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Hartford Education Association v. Board of Education of the Town of East Hartford
(2×)
See Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976), aff'g mem., 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975) (three judge court) (sodomy statute is constitutional as applied to private, consensual homosexual behavior).
cited
Cited "see"
Cain v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar
See Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 195 (E.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd mem. 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976); In re Richards, 333 Mo. 907 , 63 S.W.2d 672, 675-77 (1933).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saal v. Middendorf
See, Doe v. Commonwealth, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 , rehearing denied, 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 2192 , 48 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976), summarily affirming a three-judge court decision rejecting a constitutional attack on a Virginia statute making sodomy a crime, reported at 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975); and Cafeteria & Rest.
cited
Cited "see"
Gay Lib v. University of Missouri
See, Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct.. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976). 43 .
cited
Cited "see"
Aldo Mario Lovisi and Margaret Lovisi v. A. E. Slayton, Jr., Superintendent, Leake Parrish, Superintendent
See Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975) (three-judge court), aff’d, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (March 29, 1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EW v. New York Blood Center
December 2, 1999); W.G.A. v. Priority Pharmacy, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 616, 617 (E.D.Mo.1999); Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D. at 161 ; see also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Atty. for Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975)(homosexuality), aff'd, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).; Doe v. McConn, 489 F.Supp. 76 (S.D.Tex.1980)(transsexuality).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Korup v. Flaherty
See also Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. 182, 184-85, 198 (E.D.N.Y.1975) (3 judge court), aff’d without opinion, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Dodge
See also, Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976) (summarily affirming three judge federal district court decision dismissing challenge by male homosexuals to statute forbidding sodomy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.B.K., Inc., Etc. v. Norman Caron
See also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975), aff’d mem, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976) in which the Supreme Court summarily affirmed a three-judge court decision upholding the constitutionality of a Virginia sodomy statute against a right to privacy challenge.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Langley
See also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (3-judge court, E.D.Va.), aff’d, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 , reh. den. 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 2192 , 48 L.Ed.2d 810 ; Enslin v. Wallford, 565 F.2d 156 (4 Cir.), pet. cert. - S.Ct. -, 56 L.Ed.2d 413 (U.S.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd., Etc. v. Frank L. Rizzo, Mayor of Philadelphia
(2×)
See, e. g., Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 425 U. S. 901 (1976) (Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens, JJ., dissenting); Ringgold v. Borough of Collingswood, 426 U. S. 901 (1976) (Brennan, Marshall, and Black-mun, JJ., dissenting).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bowman Transportation, Inc.
v.
Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
v.
Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
No. 75-676.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1976.
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Ark.
Mr. Justice Stevens would reverse.