green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hooper v. Polychrome, Inc.
Corp., 831 F.Supp. 1292, 1294 (D.S.C.1993) (discussing certification under Rule 23(b)(1) in a WARN Act case); but see Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 762-63 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976) (by moving for summary judgment prior to the class determination and the sending out of class notice, the defendants “assumed the risk that a judgment in their favor would not protect them from subsequent suits by other potential class members.”) After carefully considering all of the circumstances of the instant ease, the court conclud…
discussed
Cited "see"
Reudy v. Clear Channel Outdoors, Inc.
In Hensley , the Supreme Court noted that, while these ‘other considerations’ included factors previously used in assessing the overall reasonableness of fees, see Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974); accord Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976), many of these same factors are now ‘subsumed within the initial calculation of hours reasonably expended at a reasonable hourly rate,’ 461 ll,S. at 434 n. 9, 103 S.Ct. at 1940 n. 9.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reel v. Clarian Health Partners, Inc.
See Roberts v. American Awlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 762-1463 (7th Cir.1975) (citing Haas and holding that "the defendants, by moving for summary judgment prior to the class determination and the sending out of class notice, assumed the risk that a judgment in their favor would not protect them from subsequent suits by other potential class members"), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terrebonne, Ltd. of California v. Murray
See Stewart v. Gates, 987 F.2d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir.1993), discussing relevant factors which district courts may consider in determining the number of hours reasonably expended, the reasonable hourly' rate and the resultant basic fee (citing Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976)). 28 To substantiate his request for attorneys fees, Mr. Hassen submitted itemized billings of the time spent by him and members of the Miller, Starr law firm preparing for the disqualification motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Terran v. Kaplan
See Orange Production Credit v. Frontline Ventures Ltd., 792 F.2d 797 , 801 (9th Cir.1986), citing Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 and Moore v. Jas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltzman v. Friedman
See McGrath v. County of Nevada, 67 F.3d 248, 252 (9th Cir.1995) (stating that district court should take into account factors set forth in Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 (1976), to determine reasonable fee). 14 Griffin's request for costs and fees on appeal under DeWitt v. Western Pacific R.R., 719 F.2d 1448 , 1452-53 (9th Cir.1983), which was raised for the first time at oral argument, is denied. 15 AFFIRMED. * Honorable William W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Regina Ann Mattoon, and Cross-Appellee v. Sahara Las Vegas Corporation, Dba Sahara Hotel and Casino, And
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975) (noting that "meaningful review is impossible" where record was "devoid of information as to the factors considered by the district court in its determination"), cert. denied sub nom., Perkins v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 425 U.S. 951 (1976). 7 The district court judgment as a matter of law in favor of Sahara is AFFIRMED and the attorney's fees issue is REMANDED for further proceedings. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth …
discussed
Cited "see"
Kasza v. Browner
Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 n. 9, 103 S.Ct. at 1940 n. 9; see Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975) (adopting factors listed in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); see also Stewart v. Gates, 987 F.2d 1450, 1453 (9th Cir.1993) (stating that consideration of whether fee is fixed or contingent is not relevant to determining basic fee).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak
(2×)
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975) (enumerating the factors that may be considered in adjusting the lodestar amount), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Friend v. Kolodzieczak
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975) (enumerating the factors that may be considered in adjusting the lodestar amount), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7360, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,573, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,919 Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975) (enumerating the factors that may be considered in adjusting the lodestar amount), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hammer v. Gross
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Griepentrog
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Gate Audobon Society, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976), wherein the Ninth Circuit adopted 12 criteria for determining an appropriate fee award. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles
In Hensley , the Supreme Court noted that, while these “other considerations” included factors previously used in assessing the overall reasonableness of fees, see Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974); accord Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976), 9 many of these same factors are now “subsumed within the initial calculation of hours reasonably expended at a reasonable hourly rate,” 461 U.S. at 434 n. 9, 103 S.Ct. 1940 n. 9.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
(2×)
See Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 762-63 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); see also Pharo v. Smith, 621 F.2d 656, 663-64 (5th Cir.), rehearing granted in part and modified on other grounds, 625 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir.1980) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co.
See, Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 , 70 (9th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.
See Maxfield, 752 F.2d at 435 . 41 In this case, Bechtel shall have 15 days following the filing of this decision within which to submit a declaration for attorneys' fees calculated in accordance with the factors set forth in Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976). 42 AFFIRMED. 1 Bechtel argues that removal of the case was proper under 28 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Perry v. O'Donnell
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976). 4 II.
cited
Cited "see"
Perry v. O'Donnell
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuelu Masalosalo, a Minor, by Paepae Masalosalo, His Mother and Guardian Ad Litem, and Paepae Masalosalo v. Stonewall Insurance Company
(2×)
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Banks v. State
See United States v. Selikoff, 524 F.2d 650 (2nd Cir.1975), cert. den., 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Shakey's Inc. v. Covalt
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976). .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Complaint of Berkley Curtis Bay Co.
See Rodriguez v. Olaf Pedersen’s Rederi A/S, 527 F.2d 1282 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Albanese v. N.V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Restaurant Marketing Associates, Inc.
See Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Brandenburger v. Thompson, 494 F.2d 885 , 890 n.7 (9th Cir. 1974); Stanford Daily v. Zurcher, 64 F.R.D. at 682 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Longview Refining Co. v. Shore
See Carpenters 46 County Conference Board v. The Construction Industry Stabilization Committee, 522 F.2d 637 (Em.App.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); United States v. California, 504 F.2d 750 (Em.App.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 2423 , 44 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975); State Trial Attorneys Association v. Flournoy, 522 F.2d 1406 (Em.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mabel Vickers v. James L. Trainor, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid
See Williams v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 762 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Case & Company, Inc. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 523 F.2d 355, 360 (7th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Air West Inc.
Accord, Roberts v. American Airlines, 526 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrett v. Advantage Plus Credit Reporting Incorporated
See e.g., Taylor v. Inflection Risk Sols., LLC, No. 20-cv-2266, ECF 25 skill requisite to perform the legal service properly, (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case, (5) the customary fee, (6) whether the fee is 26 fixed or contingent, (7) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances, (8) the amount involved and the results obtained, (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the 27 attorneys, (10) the ‘undesirability’ of the case, (11) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client, and (12) awards in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phoenix Racing, Ltd. v. Lebanon Valley Auto Racing Corp.
Cooper, Federal Practice & Procedure § 4478 (1981)); see also Rodriguez v. Olaf Pedersen’s Rederi A/S, 387 F.Supp. 754 (E.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd 527 F.2d 1282 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, American Stevedores, Inc. v. Olaf Pedersen’s Rederi A/S, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976) (finding that prior ruling does not relieve a district court of its obligation to present the Court of Appeals with what it believes to be a correct judgment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lane v. City of Emeryville
Ed. 2d 390 (1987), that reasonableness of fee requests must be established, Intel Corp. v. Terabyte Int'l, Inc., 6 F.3d 614, 622-23 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S. Ct. 1726 , 48 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. Purpero
(2×)
See, e.g., Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 761 (7th Cir.1975) (noting that in “cases where issues have become moot as a result of judicial decision, or otherwise, the courts unquestionably have the authority, and it often becomes their duty, to dismiss cases sua sponte and without any motion to dismiss being made.”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975), cert. denied, Williams v. American Airlines, Inc., 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Huang v. Shiu, 124 F.R.D. 175, 178 (N.D.Ill.1988) (“‘A District Court may properly…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Farah
See also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 , 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976) (adopting the Johnson factors); In re Saunders, 124 B.R. 234, 236 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1991). 3 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
See also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
See also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
See also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA IND. v. State of Wis.
See also Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 761 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood Of Central And Northern Arizona v. The State Of Arizona
See, e.g., Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 , 69-70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 , 719 (5th Cir.1974), cited with approval in S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood v. Arizona
See, e.g., Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 , 719 (5th Cir.1974), cited with approval in S.Rep.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Moran v. Pima County
Hensley v. Eckerhart, supra; see also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
Katz v. Carte Blanche Corporation, 496 F.2d 747, 762 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1975); see also Roberts v. American Airlines, Inc., 526 F.2d 757, 762-763 (7th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976) (while defendants assumed the risk that a judgment in their favor would not protect them from subsequent suits by other potential class members, they retained the “not inconse quential protection of stare decisis regarding claims of unnamed plaintiffs”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc.
See, e.g., Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 , 70 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 243.538 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Maui
See also Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Fountila v. Carter, 571 F.2d 487 (9th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uneeda Davis v. Ball Memorial Hospital Association Patricia Roberts Harris, in Her Capacity as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
(2×)
Compare Roberts v. American Airlines, 526 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 ; Case & Co. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 523 F.2d 355 (7th Cir. 1975) (summary judgment cases from this Circuit in which the Court has refused to look beyond the named plaintiffs) 16 with City of Inglewood v. City of Los Angeles, 451 F.2d 948 (9th Cir. 1971); 3B Moore's Federal Practice P 23.50 at 423 (taking allegations regarding class as true during consideration under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carpenters 46 County Conference Board
v.
Construction Industry Stabilization Committee
v.
Construction Industry Stabilization Committee
No. 75-1021.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1976.
Published
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.