green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“We cannot accept the argument that administrative segregation of a prisoner is equivalent to his arrest.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Darryl Brooks
we cannot accept the argument that administrative segregation of a prisoner is equivalent to his arrest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amrine v. Brooks
See United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976); see also United States v. Daniels, 698 F.2d 221, 223 (4th Cir.1983) (segregated confinement is not an arrest for purposes of constitutional protections); United States v. Clardy, 540 F.2d 439, 441 (9th Cir.) (placement in segregated confinement for five months until indictment not an arrest for speedy trial purposes), cert. denied 429 U.S. 963 , 97 S.Ct. 391 , 50 L.Ed.2d 331 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Amrine v. John C. Hemeyer
See United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 952 (1976); see also United States v. Daniels, 698 F.2d 221, 223 (4th Cir. 1983) (segregated confinement is not an arrest for purposes of constitutional protections ); United States v. Clardy, 540 F.2d 439, 441 (9th Cir.) (placement in segregated confinement for five months until indictment not an arrest for speedy trial purposes), cert. denied 429 U.S. 963 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy C. Bradfield and Lee Andrew Williams
See United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580, 587 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976) (fee must be contingent on the conviction of a pretargeted individual; Williamson does not apply where an informant is paid a subsistence allowance and given a reward, as long as there is no evidence that he had been promised a specific sum to convict a particular person); Harris v. United States, 400 F.2d 264, 266 (5th Cir.1968) (Williamson does not apply if the government knows that the targeted individual was engaged in the illicit activity prior to the ins…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker
See United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 561 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Apex Municipal Fund v. N-Group Securities
See United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 563 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976); United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d at 538 .
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Greene
Instead, we find that "[a] witness is not the property of either party to a suit and simply because one party may have conferred with a witness and - even paid him for his expert advice does not render him incompetent to testify for the other party” (People v Speck, 41 Ill 2d 177, 200, 242 NE2d 208, 221 , revd on other grounds 403 US 946 , reh denied 404 US 875 [involving the prosecutor’s use of a fingerprint expert who was retained by defense counsel]; see, United States v Pipkins, 528 F2d 559, cert denied 426 US 952 [involving the prosecutor’s use of a handwriting expert who was retain…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. T. Windle Dyer
See United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 563 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Preston
See United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy E. Wilson, United States of America v. Buddy Rex Wilson
(2×)
See United States v. Oaks, 527 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, Defendants
See generally United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 562-63 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest M. Millican, Jr.
See United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 394 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fritz Erne
Accord, United States v. Oaks, 527 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis E. Gillings and Ruth Gillings
See United States v. Oaks, 527 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976); United States v. Kelly, 556 F.2d 257, 264 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air Force
(2×)
See generally United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 562 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 517 F.2d 666, 670 (5th Cir. 1975); J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kobluk v. University of Minnesota
Compare In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 727 F.2d at 1355, United States v. Lawless, 709 F.2d 485, 487 (7th Cir.1983), United States v. Bump, 605 F.2d 548, 550-51 (10th Cir.1979), United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 563 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976), United States v. Cote, 456 F.2d 142 , 145 n. 3 (8th Cir.1972) (holding that information underlying a document intended for eventual publication is not covered by the privilege because it is not intended to be confidential or because confidentiality is destroyed by publication), with Natta v. Hogan…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin, United States of America v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong
See, e.g., United States v. Steele, 461 F.2d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.1972) (Steele himself located six other similarly situated persons who had not been prosecuted) 9 The reference is to United States v. Oaks, 527 F.2d 937 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America and Frank M. Odom, Special Agent Internal Revenue Service v. Mitchell Aronson
See also United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 563 (5th Cir.) (attorney-client privilege inapplicable to “information that the client intends his attorney to impart to others”), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976). 1 Aronson’s other arguments on appeal have no merit and warrant no discussion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
See, e. g., Oaks v. United States, 527 F.2d 937, 941 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976) (surveillance by undercover agent of public meetings of tax rebellion group).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Menard v. State
United States v. Durham, 512 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 871 , 96 S.Ct. 137 , 46 L.Ed.2d 102 (1975); see also United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johann Ernst Thurnhuber
See, e. g., United States v. Oaks, 527 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1976); United States v. Scott, 521 F.2d 1188, 1195 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 955 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976); United States v. Bennett, 539 F.2d 45, 54 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 925 , 97 S.Ct. 327 , 50 L.Ed.2d 293 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rafeal Wofford
Compare United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976), with Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mays
See, e. g., United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976); Joyce, supra, 499 F.2d at 19-2,0 ; United States v. Parish, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 72 , 468 F.2d 1129, 1132 (1972), cert, denied, 410 U.S. 957 , 93 S.Ct. 1430 , 35 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cecil R. Mays, Robert Jack Coltrane, Buddy Herman Mathis, Defendants- United States of America v. Robert Jack Coltrane, Cecil R. Mays, J. Robert West
See, e. g., United States v. Duke, 527 F.2d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952 , 96 S.Ct. 3177 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1190 (1976); Joyce, supra, 499 F.2d at 19-20 ; United States v. Parish, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 72 , 468 F.2d 1129, 1132 (1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 957 , 93 S.Ct. 1430 , 35 L.Ed.2d 690 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Austin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-6514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.