green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender Rehabilitation
While the Court in these decisions indicated its approval of properly guided jury participation in the capital punishment sentencing process, see, e. g., Roberts v. Louisiana, supra, 428 U.S. at 335, 96 S.Ct. at 3007 (opinion of Stewart, *599 Powell, and Stevens, JJ.); Woodson v. North Carolina, supra, 428 U.S. at 302, 96 S.Ct. at 2990 (opinion of Stewart, Powell, and Stevens, JJ.); Jurek v. Texas, supra, 428 U.S. at 269-75, 96 S.Ct. at 2955-57 (opinion of Stewart, Powell, and Stevens, JJ.); Proffitt v. Florida, supra, 428 U.S. at 253, 96 S.Ct. at 2966 (opinion of Stewart, Powell, and Stevens,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stern v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 , 670 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976); Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974); McConnehead v. State, 515 So.2d 1046, 1048 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peyton v. United States
See People v. Whitfield, 58 Mich.App. 585 , 228 N.W.2d 475, 477 (1975) (citing cases). “[W]e cannot say that this one utterance [regarding a witness’ polygraph examination] caused a miscarriage of justice which would necessitate a reversal of the conviction.” Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 636 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3226 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976); see also State v. Farrar, 309 Or. 132 , 786 P.2d 161, 182(Or.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 879 , 111 S.Ct. 212 , 112 L.Ed.2d 171 (1990) (“[t]he reference did not warrant a mistrial because it was isolated and made onl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Vincente v. State
See Hallman v. State, 305 So.2d 180, 181 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3226 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976); see also People v. Simons, 42 Cal. App.4th 1100 , 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 351 (1996); Frey v. State, 580 N.E.2d 362, 364 (Ind.Ct.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delgado v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976); State v. Ashby, 245 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1971); Adams v. State, 240 So.2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); United States v. Jonas, 639 F.2d 200 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. State
“Appellate courts review enumerations for correction of errors of law committed by the trial court — where motions or objections are properly presented for a ruling by the trial court. [Cit.] Enumerated errors which raise issues for the first time in a motion for new trial or on appeal present nothing for review. [Cit.]” Fowler v. State, 155 Ga. App. 76 (2) ( 270 SE2d 297 ) (1980); see Pulliam v. State, 236 Ga. 460, 465 ( 224 SE2d 8 ) (1976) cert. denied, 428 U. S. 911 , reh. denied, 429 U. S. 874 .
discussed
Cited "see"
NC v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975), cert. den. 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976), (a movant for judgment of acquittal admits all facts adduced and all reasonable inferences therefrom).
discussed
Cited "see"
N.C. v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla.1975), cert. den. 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976), (a movant for judgment of acquittal admits all facts adduced and all reasonable inferences therefrom).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3226 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Ford v. Wainwright
See Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3226 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Herzog v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666, 670 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed,2d 1221 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Herzog v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666, 670 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. Wainwright
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666, 670 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clay v. State
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976) (prior warning that if victim should later happen to hear a gunshot it would be in his motel room).
cited
Cited "see"
Dobbert v. Strickland
See Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666, 670 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Simeon v. State
Compare Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3226 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976); see also Hutchins, 334 So.2d at 113 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
See also Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3227 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pulliam
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 75-6653.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 6, 1976.
Brennan, Marshall.
Published
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ga.
Dissent
Mr. Justice Brennan,
dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Gregg v. Georgia, ante, p. 227, the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in each of these cases [No. 74^5196 through No. 75-6653] constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I would therefore grant certiorari in each of these cases and vacate the judgment in each case insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed.
Dissent
Mr. Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Because I consider the death penalty to be a cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, see Gregg v. Georgia, ante, p. 231 (Marshall, J., dissenting), I would grant certiorari in these cases [No. 74-5196 through No. 75-6653] and vacate the judgments insofar as they leave undisturbed the sentences of death.