green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc.
See also Roamvell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 617 (1976) (denial of certiorari) (White, J., dissenting): to be patentable, a combination of elements must produce something more than the sum of the pre-existing elements; there must be a synergistic result that is itself nonobvious. 429 U.S. at 1006, 97 S.Ct. at 539. 19 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brennan v. Mr. Hanger, Inc.
Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., supra, 429 U.S. at 1008, 97 S.Ct. at 541, [192 U.S.P.Q. at 66] (White, J., joined by Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), quoting Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co., 321 U.S. 275, 279 , 64 S.Ct. 593 , 88 L.Ed. 721 [ 60 U.S.P.Q. 386, 388 ] (1944).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Wainright
See United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 746 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Wade Wainright
See United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 746 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Adobe Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation
See Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 , 854 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maribel Laboy, A/K/A Jennifer Morales, Mary Torres
See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Armco Inc. v. Glenfed Financial Corp.
Jacobs v. Freeman, 104 Cal.App.3d 177, 188 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 680, 686 (Cal.Ct.App.1980); accord Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Re Community Medical Center, 623 F.2d 864, 866 (3d Cir.1980), citing Tessmar v. Grosner, 23 N.J. 193 , 128 A.2d 467 (1957). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman
See Shivers v. Amerco, 670 F.2d 826, 830 (9th Cir.1982) (citing Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); and O’Brien v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co., 593 F.2d 54, 58 (7th Cir.1979)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary E. Hansen, Daniel E. Means, AKA Daniel E. Johnson, and Stephen R. Bryant
See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 527 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis Shuckahosee
See United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 527 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Hoog, 504 F.2d 45, 50 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1349 , 43 L.Ed.2d 437 (1975); United States v. Cartano, 420 F.2d 362, 364 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1054 , 90 S.Ct. 1398 , 25 L.Ed.2d 671 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burndy Corp. v. Kearney-National, Inc.
Accord, Roanwell Corp. v. Plantronics, Inc., 429 U.S. 1004, 1009 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 617 (1976) (White, J., joined by Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of writ of certiorari); Dann v. Johnston, supra, 425 U.S. at 230 n. 4, 96 S.Ct. at 1393; Anderson’s-Black Rock, supra, 396 U.S. at 61 , 90 S.Ct. at 305 ; Digitronics Corp. v. New York Racing Association, Inc., 553 F.2d 740, 748 (2d Cir.) (“Only in a close case, in which application of the subjective criterion of nonobviousness in 35 U.S.C. § 103 does not produce a firm conclusion, can those objective or secondary considerations b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Headdress
See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Demareo Lamont Davis, United States of America v. Dwayne Buford Reed
See, e.g., United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976) (holding that admission of graphic photographs of murder victim was not abuse of discretion under Rule 403).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Duncan
See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Copeland
See generally Perez ; see also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Rubio, 709 F.2d 146 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Copeland
See generally Perez ; see also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Rubio, 709 F.2d 146 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Randolph Short, and Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir.) (voluntariness is the sole test for admitting a confession and delays caused by a defendant do not render the confession inadmissible), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp.
(2×)
Davis v. Davis, 526 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir.1976); see also Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849 (9th Cir), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See e.g., Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Shamrock Associates v. Moraga Corp., 557 F.Supp. 198, 204 (D.Del.1983); see also Brown, 661 F.2d at 65 (discussing Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See e.g., Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Shamrock Associates v. Moraga Corp., 557 F.Supp. 198, 204 (D.Del.1983); see also Brown, 661 F.2d at 65 (discussing Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977, for Premises at 2125 S Street, Northwest, Washington, D. C. Appeal of United States. In Re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977, for Premises at 2125 S Street, Northwest, Washington, D. C. Appeal of Founding Church of Scientology
Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (courts characterizing as "inadvertent" the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be "inadvertent" if, before searching begins, police have probable cause to seize it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977
Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (courts characterizing as “inadvertent” the discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be “inadvertent” if, before searching begins, police have probable cause to seize it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Heldt
Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (both courts characterize as “inadvertent” discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be “inadvertent” if, before searching begins, police have probable cause to seize it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henning Heldt and Duke Snider, United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard, United States of America v. Sharon Thomas, United States of America v. Gregory Willardson, United States of America v. Richard Weigand, United States of America v. Cindy Raymond, United States of America v. Gerald Bennett Wolfe, United States of America v. Mitchell Hermann
Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F.2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (both courts characterize as "inadvertent" discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but failed to do so), with United States v. Winston, 373 F.Supp. 1005, 1007 (E.D.Mich.1974) (seizure of item cannot be "inadvertent" if, before searching begins, police have probable cause to seize it).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schimizzi v. Chrysler Corp.
See also the dissenting opinion of Justice White in Plantronics, Inc. v. Roanwell Corp., supra, 429 U.S. at 1008-09, 97 S.Ct. 538 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rufus Gaines
See, e. g., United States v. Shoemaker, 542 F.2d 561, 563 (10th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 537 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); United States v. Edwards, 539 F.2d 689, 691 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 984 , 97 S.Ct. 501 , 50 L.Ed.2d 594 ; United States v. Bear Killer, 534 F.2d 1253, 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 129 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 ; United States v. Crocker, 510 F.2d 1129, 1138 (10th Cir. 1975); United States v. Mandley, 502 F.2d 1103, 1105 (9th Cir. 1974); United States v. Hathorn, 451 F.2d 1337, 1340-41 (5th Cir. 1971); and United…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shoemaker
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1976.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.