Connor v. Finch, 429 U.S. 1010 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Connor v. Finch, 429 U.S. 1010 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
83 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Interest of T. E. T. (tex, 1980-07-16) · Strongest negative: Kerrigan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (nysd, 1978-05-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Kerrigan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e. g., Ayers v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" In the Interest of T. E. T. (2×)
Tex. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See In the Interest of K, 535 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 620 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Klamberg v. Roth
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532, 537-38 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grote v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
La. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Henderson v. Tucker, 721 F.Supp. 24 (D.R.I. 1989); See also Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dorothy Zosky v. Daniel Boyer and Boenning and Scattergood
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 538 F.2d 532, 536-37 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moncrieff v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Moore, 590 F.2d 823, 827-29 (10th Cir.1978), Weissbuch v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 558 F.2d 831, 834-35 (7th Cir.1977), Ayres v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532, 536 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barrowclough v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532 , 534 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976); Dickstein v. duPont, 443 F.2d 783, 785 (1st Cir.1971); but cf. Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d at 108 -09 14 In Stokes, the issue referred to arbitration concerned the amounts allegedly due employees under a profit sharing plan.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barrowclough v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532 , 534 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976); Dickstein v. duPont, 443 F.2d 783, 785 (1st Cir.1971); but cf. Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d at 108-09 . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Coons v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 538 F.2d 532, 537 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976) (distinguishing Ryan because “[t]he complaint alleges that Ayres could and would have elected not to retire and not to sell his stock” had he known about defendant’s plans). 3 Plaintiffs also attempt to avoid the impact of Ryan and its progeny by reframing the materiality inquiry.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Connor
v.
Finch, Governor of Mississippi
No. 76-777.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1976.
429 U.S. 1010
Published

D. C. S. D. Miss. Requests of Peggy J. Connor et al. and of the United States to treat application [A-421] as an expedited appeal from judgment denying injunctive relief entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi on November 18, 1976, granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.

Parties may file and exchange such motions under Rule 16 as they desire, and they shall file and exchange briefs on the merits on or before the close of business Monday, February 7, 1977. Responsive briefs, if any, shall be filed and exchanged on or before the close of business Monday, February 21, 1977. Oral argument set for Monday, February 28, 1977.

It is further ordered that any and all other appeals from the above judgment be taken by filing notices of appeal and perfected pursuant to the Rules of the Court by filing state[*1011] ments as to jurisdiction on or before the close of business Wednesday, January 5, 1977.

In all other respects, the application presented to Mr. Justice Powell, and. by him referred to the Court, is denied. Reported below: See 419 F. Supp. 1072 and 1089 ; 422 F. Supp. 1014.