green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
15.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“On review the appellate court is required to apply the same test the district court should have utilized initially.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Distinguished
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See also United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977) (distinguished in Peacock). 69 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Samuel J. Falcone v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Appeal of Samuel J. Falcone
on review the appellate court is required to apply the same test the district court should have utilized initially.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
Accord United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972, 978 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977); United States v. Wilson, 284 F.2d 407, 408 (4th Cir. 1960); United States v. Jeter, 775 F.2d 670, 679 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1142 , 106 S.Ct. 1796 , 90 L.Ed.2d 341 (1986); Churder v. United States, 387 F.2d 825, 833 (8th Cir. 1968); United States v. Seaman, 18 F.3d 649, 650 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Alberico, 604 F.2d 1315, 1321 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 992 , 100 S.Ct. 524 , 62 L.Ed.2d 422 (1979); United States v. Langston, 9…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. MX Wholesale Fuel Corp.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976)(finding that deemed admission was properly considered in motion for summary judgment), cert. denied Mead Johnson & Company v. Goodman, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniels v. Delaware
See Goodman *418 v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNeil v. AT & T Universal Card
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); Siss v. County of Passaic, 75 F.Supp.2d 325, 331 (D.N.J.1999). 4 Plaintiffs have thus conceded in a conclusive manner that they were unaware of any facts supporting any of the substantial allegations in their complaint.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. Shisler
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 569 (3d Cir.1976) (district court improperly denied amendment to add claims and substitute parties), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schenekl v. State
See Parkerson v. State, 942 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.) (citing Swisher v. State, 544 S.W.2d 379, 382 (Tex.Crim.App.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 734 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
Carrigan v. State of Del.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976) (footnote omitted), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolfson v. Lewis
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 569 (3d Cir.1976) (district court improperly denied amendment to add claims and substitute parties), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Hein v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1470, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921p John M. Hein Merlene Hein v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Burton McNeil Acting as Howard Savings Bank Pension Plan Administrator and Howard Savings Bank Pension Plan Burton McNeil and the Retirement Plan of the Howard Savings Bank
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). 66 Counts II and III of Hein's amended complaint allege that the defendants in this case are equitably estopped from denying Hein unreduced early retirement benefits.
cited
Cited "see"
Illingworth v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
R.J. Longo Construction Co. v. Transit America, Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Co. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Metsopulos v. Runyon
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Ceramics Inc. v. Firemen's Fund Insurance Companies
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977) 4 In 1971, General Ceramics purchased a poly-silicon manufacturing plant in Plumbsteadville, Pennsylvania.
cited
Cited "see"
General Ceramics Inc. v. Firemen's Fund Insurance Companies
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, Pa., 853 F.2d 1084, 1093 (3d Cir.1988). 20 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
Luden's Inc. v. Local Union No. 6 of the Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International Union
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, Pa., 853 F.2d 1084, 1093 (3d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Luden's, Inc. v. Local Union No. 6, Bakery, Confect'ryTobacco Wrkrs Internat'l
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S. Ct. 732 (1977); Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, Pa., 853 F.2d 1084, 1093 (3d Cir. 1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Dorothy E. Travitz v. Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund Ilgwu Eastern States Health and Welfare Fund
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. North Star Steel Co.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. North Star Steel Company, Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Medina v. California
(2×)
See United States v. DiGilio, 538 F. 2d 972, 988 (CA3 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1038 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Shipe
Accord United States v Marzano, 537 F2d 257, 272 (CA 7, 1976), cert den 429 US 1038 (1977); United States v Diggs, 173 US App DC 95, 108; 522 F2d 1310 (1975), cert den sub nom United States v Floyd, 429 US 852 (1976); United States v Cooper, 164 US App DC 191, 194; 504 F2d 260 (1974); United States v Fleming, 504 F2d 1045, 1054 (CA 7, 1974) ("Congress’ concern was penalizing the robbery of the institution, perpetrated by whatever means, and not penalizing the robbery of each individual teller”). 16 See n 11, ante. 17 See n 11, ante. 18 See People v Holt, 54 Mich App 60, 63-64 ; 220 NW2d 20…
cited
Cited "see"
Larry Gene Hull v. Robert M. Freeman Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General
See United States v. Digilio, 538 F.2d 972, 988 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977); United States v. Hollis, 569 F.2d 199, 204 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tierran v. Devoe
See Autera v. Robinson, 419 F.2d 1197 (D.C.Cir.1969) (describing consequences of summary enforcement of a settlement, and finding a hearing necessary). 5 25 When reviewing a summary judgment motion, we must treat all the non-movant's assertions as true, and "when these assertions conflict with those of the movant, the former must receive the benefit of the doubt." Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 732, 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tiernan v. Devoe
See Antera v. Robinson, 419 F.2d 1197 (D.C.Cir.1969) (describing consequences of summary enforcement of a settlement, and finding a hearing necessary). 5 When reviewing a summary judgment motion, we must treat all the non-movant’s assertions as true, and “when these assertions conflict with those of the movant, the former must receive the benefit of the doubt.” Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 732, 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anchorage Associates v. Virgin Islands Board Of Tax Review
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); see also U.S. v. Kasuboski, 834 F.2d 1345 , 1350 (7th Cir.1987); Dukes v. South Carolina Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anchorage Associates v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); see also U.S. v. Kasuboski, 834 F.2d 1345 , 1350 (7th Cir.1987); Dukes v. South Carolina Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Beverly, Betty McNulty George Brown and Diane Griffin
See United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976) (general verdict for dual-objective conspiracy count reversed where evidence was insufficient to support conviction under one objective), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Perry, Edith v. Command Performance
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Riggin
See United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972 (3rd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paredes-Moya
See United States v. DiMuro, 540 F.2d 503 , 512 n. 15 (1st Cir.1976) (purpose is to assure accuracy), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977); United States v. Crouch, 528 F.2d 625, 629 (7th Cir.) (purpose is to assure disclosure), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 900 , 97 S.Ct. 267 , 50 L.Ed.2d 184 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard O. Reb'll
See United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972, 980 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'donnell v. Yanchulis
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). 3 We first summarize the allegations of O'Donnell's amended complaint.
cited
Cited "see"
O'Donnell v. Yanchulis
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maurice S. Osser
See United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 51 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knecht, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance Company
(2×)
See Goodman v. Meade Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566 , 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
J. Filiberto Sanitation, Inc. v. State Of New Jersey Department Of Environmental Protection
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
J. Filiberto Sanitation, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerena
See United States v. DiMuro, 540 F.2d 503 , 512 N. 15 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Maurice John, a Native American and Member of the Seneca Nation of Indians v. City of Salamanca and Norris Stone
See Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. Kings County, 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 731 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northeastern Bank of Pennsylvania v. Clark (In Re White Beauty View, Inc.)
As the Third Circuit of Appeals recently stated, the motion “may only be granted only if, as a matter of law, viewing all the evidence which has been tendered and should have been admitted in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, no jury could decide in that party’s favor.” Tigg Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp., 822 F.2d 358, 361 (3d Cir.1987); accord, Goodman v. Mead Johnson and Co., 534 F.2d 566 (3d Cir.1976), cert., denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); In re H & H Beverage Distributors, Inc, 65 B.R. 243 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1986); In re Paolino, 75 B.R…
cited
Cited "see"
8 Employee Benefits Ca 1429, 8 Employee Benefits Ca 2682 Vance L. Eckersley v. Wgal Tv, Inc. And Wgal Pension Plan
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Eckersley v. WGAL TV, Inc.
See Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swisher
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 76-264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.