green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. ReBrook
See United States v. Mathis, 550 F.2d 180, 182 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1140 , 51 L.Ed.2d 560 (1977) [newspaper article connecting witness to a robbery was inadmissible hearsay, even for impeachment purposes]; Horta v. Sullivan, 4 F.3d 2, 8-9 (1st Cir.1993) [newspaper article is hearsay, inadmissible at trial to prove the truth of the reported facts]; Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., 286 F.2d 388, 391-92 (5th Cir.1961) [newspaper article is hearsay, and in almost all circumstances is inadmissible].
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Smith
See Ramsey v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706, 708 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1139 , 51 L.Ed.2d 559 (1977) (motion to file interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) held frivolous since no circumstances justified such a motion).
cited
Cited "see"
Ralph Freedson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Ramsay v. Bailey, 5 Cir., 1976, 531 F.2d 706 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1139 , 51 L.Ed.2d 559 (1977); Pond v. Braniff Airways, Inc., 5 Cir., 1972, 453 F.2d 347 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Scroggins
(2×)
Compare Motes v. United States, 178 U.S. 458 , 20 S.Ct. 993 , 44 L.Ed. 1150 (1900) (reversing the admission of prior testimony of an absent witness where a member of prosecution team released the witness, who was under indictment, under his own recognizance with full knowledge that he would be needed as a witness) with United States v. Mathis, 550 F.2d 180, 182 (4th Cir.1976) (upholding the admission of the prior testimony of an absent witness where "there [was] no evidence that the prison official who released [the witness] knew that [the witness] would be needed as a witness"), cert. denied,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. Jones
See also, Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1139 , 51 L.Ed.2d 559 (1977) (dismissal not an abuse of discretion where action had been pending more than three years, had already been dismissed for want of prosecution and then reinstated, the plaintiff had unreasonably delayed replying to a discovery order, had received several time extensions, had interposed frivolous motions, had failed to file a reply brief after promising the court imminent, and had ignored repeated warnings); Asociacion de Empleados v. Rodriguez Morales, 538 F.2d 915 (1st C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation
See also Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1139 , 51 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977). 17 While we agree that these factors are pertinent, the approach of this court has been to eschew a listing of factors because of the great variety of situations in which this issue arises, but instead to emphasize that dismissal is a drastic sanction and should be reserved for those cases where there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
See also Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1107 , 97 S.Ct. 1139 , 51 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bressler
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.