green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“concert of action”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alfredo Suarez, Jr. v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
To presume otherwise is to STEWART's opinion dissenting from the Court's make light of Winship. 7 denial of certiorari in Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U.S. 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nick N.Feizy v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
JUSTICE STEWART's opinion dissenting from the Court's denial of certiorari in Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U.S. 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
in the Matter of B. D. S.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
JUSTICE STEWART's opinion dissenting from the Court's denial of certiorari in Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U.S. 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116 .
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Jackson v. Virginia
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
JUSTICE STEWART's opinion dissenting from the Court's denial of certiorari in Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U. S. 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1116 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roberts
(2×)
See United States v. Zamarripa (C.A.8, 1976), 544 F.2d 978 , 982, certiorari denied 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 ; State v. Lopez (1957), 182 Kan. 46 , 51-2, 318 P.2d 662 , 666.
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonse Cuozzo, United States of America v. Robert Frank Stella, Jr., United States of America v. Karin Susan Monari
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1326-1327 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977) (prior conviction for conspiracy to issue unauthorized securities and mail fraud admissible under Rule 609(a)(2)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Geesa v. State
(2×)
See Freeman v. Zahradnick, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1150 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977) (Stewart, J., dissenting with proposal viewed by three justices as harbinger of Jackson v. Virginia ).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See United States v. Zamarripa, 544 F.2d 978 (8 Cir., 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ward
See United States v. Zamarripa, 544 F.2d 978 (8th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Treadwell
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1323 (9th Cir.1976), cert denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977); see also Baker v. United States, supra, 401 F.2d at 971.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Barry Wong
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1326-27 (9th Cir.1976) (mail fraud), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Connie Bivens v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden
See United States v. Lewis, 547 F.2d 1030, 1035 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene Armstrong
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1326 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977). 25 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Ray Sanders
See United States v. Lewis, 547 F.2d 1030, 1034-35 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Finis Toney, Jr.
(2×)
We, therefore, affirm Toney's conviction. 5 II 4 It is established that mail fraud is a crime involving "dishonesty or false statement." United States v. Cohen, 544 F.2d 781, 785 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2175 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); accord, United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1326-27 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
See United States v. Zamarripa (C.A.8, 1976), 544 F. 2d 978, 982 , certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1111 ; State v. Lopez (1957), 182 Kan. 46, 51-2 , 318 P. 2d 662, 666 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Jesus Herrera-Medina
(2×)
See United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977); See also United States v. Davis, 551 F.2d 233, 234-35 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 923 , 97 S.Ct. 2197 , 53 L.Ed.2d 237 (1977). * The Honorable James M.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Krasny
(2×)
We must decide the correct standard for granting a new trial when newly discovered evidence reveals that a government witness may have committed perjury during the trial. 1 10 In general, a defendant seeking a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence must meet the following requirements:"(1) It must appear from the motion that the evidence relied on is, in fact, newly discovered, i. e., discovered after the trial; (2) the motion must allege facts from which the court may infer diligence on the part of the movant; (3) the evidence relied on must not be merely cumulative or impeaching…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. O'Bryant
To the contrary, Miranda “requires only that the waiver of rights be made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently, and not that it be made in writing.” United States v. Speaks, 453 F.2d 966, 969 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1071 , 92 S.Ct. 1522 , 31 L.Ed.2d 804 (1972) (citation omitted); accord, United States v. Zamarripa, 544 F.2d 978, 981 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977); United States v. Stuckey, 441 F.2d 1104, 1105 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 841 , 92 S.Ct. 136 , 30 L.Ed.2d 76 (1971); United States v. Crisp, 435 F.2…
cited
Cited "see"
James H. Woods v. United States
See Scott v. United States, 545 F.2d 1116, 1117 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1148 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Louis Jay Bromley v. Richard Crisp, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma, David Lee Garner v. The State of Oklahoma, Gary Michael Rutledge v. Jerry Sunderland, Warden, Oklahoma State Reformatory, Billie Jay Killion, and Delmar Eugene Hanley v. Dave Faulkner, Sheriff, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, Derek Lee Wilson v. Dave Faulkner, Sheriff, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, William Lynn Stringfield v. John Grider, Warden, Oklahoma State Reformatory, Granite, Oklahoma
See Sessor v. Gunn, 529 F.2d 932, 935 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1150 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bromley v. Crisp
See Sessor v. Gunn, 529 F.2d 932, 935 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1150 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,840 Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Terri Johnson, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, Debbie Rohn, and Pamela Van Duyn v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (9th Cir.1981) (citing United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982); Ford, 632 F.2d at 1375 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see also United States v. Hooton, 662 F.2d 628, 634-35 (9th Cir.1981) (citing United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1640 , 71 L.Ed.2d 873 (1982); Ford, 632 F.2d at 1375 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lexie Little Carter
See United States v. Lewis, 472 F.2d 252, 254 (3d Cir.1973); see also United States v. Lewis, 547 F.2d 1030, 1035 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 566 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Monahan
See, e.g., United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1325 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977); United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489, 495 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25, 36 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 & 1048, 95 S.Ct. 2657 , 45 L.Ed.2d 694 , 95 S.Ct. 2667 , 45 L.Ed.2d 701 (1975); United States v. Cirrillo, 468 F.2d 1233, 1240 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1501 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Edwin Cook
(2×)
Compare United States v. Murray, 492 F.2d 178 (9th Cir. 1973), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 854 , 95 S.Ct. 98 , 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974), With United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977). 46 In Murray and our cases which cite it, we have said that one who does not testify cannot complain on appeal about impeachment by prior convictions that might have been revealed if he had testified.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matthews
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-6062.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.