green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation
inee these unique defenses could conceivably become the focus of the entire litigation and divert much of zenith's attention from the suit as a whole, the remaining members of the class could be severely disadvantaged by zenith's representation
discussed
Cited "see"
Rendler v. Gambone Bros. Development Co.
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(2)(“An order under this subdivision may be conditional, and may be altered or amended before the decision on the merits.”) “[T]he Committee Notes on Rule 23 envision modification of a class certification ‘if, upon fuller development of the facts, the original determination appears unsound.’” Zenith Laboratories v. Carter-Wallace, 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re State Police Litigation
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 35 Thus while the Act does not precisely define what an interception is, it must be deemed to have occurred “when the contents of wire communications are captured or redirected in any way.” United States v. Rodriguez, 968 F.2d 130, 136 (2d Cir.) (holding both location where conversation was redirected and where it was overheard sufficed as situs of “interception” for jurisdictional purposes), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, -, 113 S.Ct. 139 , 140, 663, 121 L.Ed.2d 92 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
See Zenith Lab., Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Bruce A. Blackie, Richard Vinson, Edward Brough, and Charles L. Meador, No. 91-5846. Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, No. 91-5890
See Zenith Lab., Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) 18 Similarly, at the outset of its opinion, the Geraghty Court described the question to be resolved as "whether a trial court's denial of a motion for certification of a class may be reviewed on appeal after the named plaintiff's personal claim has become moot." 445 U.S. at 390, 100 S.Ct. at 1205 19 Some courts of appeals have read Geraghty as holding that a district court loses jurisdiction over a pending class certification motion--filed when named …
discussed
Cited "see"
Yokum v. Frank
See Alsbury v. United States Postal Serv., 530 F.2d 852, 854-55 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 (1976). 17 Yokum argues that because Congress failed to provide non-preference eligible postal employees with the right to an independent review of Postal Service decisions that the grievance procedure available to him is not comprehensive and thus he is not preempted from bringing a Bivens action.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Weaver, Thomas D. Sikes
See United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d *1475 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tarrant
See United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d 831, 832 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (defendant breached cooperation agreement by giving evasive and misleading answers and refusing to answer certain questions), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); United States v. Reardon, 787 F.2d 512, 516 (10th Cir.1986) (defendant breached agreement by failing to provide full accounting of his own activities); United States v. Irvine, 756 F.2d 708, 710-11 (9th Cir.1985) (defendant breached cooperation agreement by soliciting bribe even though agreement only required defendant to be truthful; …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tropp
See United States v. Hilton, 534 F.2d 556 (3rd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States Postal Service
See Alsbury v. United States Postal Serv., 530 F.2d 852, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States Postal Service
See Alsbury v. United States Postal Serv., 530 F.2d 852, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) 2 Brown argues that Local Rule 230(d) dictates the content of reply briefs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Strykers Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. City of New York
See Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Koos v. First Nat’l Bank of Peoria, 496 F.2d 1162, 1164-65 (7th Cir.1974); Kline v. Wolf, 88 F.R.D. 696, 700 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp., 82 F.R.D. 730, 733-34 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, Defendants
(2×)
See United States v. Riebschlaeger, 528 F.2d 1031, 1032-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bruce Brown and Daniel Charest v. Department of Justice and Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852, 853 , 854 n. 3 (9th Cir.) (construing Postal Service Manual notice provision similar to 5 U.S.C. § 7513 (b)(1) as “allowing immediate suspension of an employee when there is reasonable cause to believe he is guilty of a crime”), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Casper v. Cunard Line, Ltd.
See, Klemow v. Time Incorporated, 466 Pa. 189 , 197 n. 17, 352 A.2d 12 , 16 n. 17, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Haft v. United States Steel Corp.
Accord, Klemow v. Time, Inc., 466 Pa. 189 , 352 A.2d 12 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Scott v. Adal, Corp., 276 Pa.Superior Ct. 459, 419 A.2d 548 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Curtis Pride v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Etc.
See United States v. Riebschlaeger, 528 F.2d 1031, 1032 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. United States Postal Service
See Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852 , 854 n.3 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re National Student Marketing Litigation
Rule 23(a)(4), Fed.R.Civ.P.; see Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Koos v. First National Bank of Peoria, 496 F.2d 1162, 1164-65 (7th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Dean-Ganek
See, e.g., United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d 831, 832 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 (1976) (government entitled to withdraw from plea bargain where defendant is in breach).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dorsey
State v. Lee, 93-2810, p. 8 (La.5/23/94); 637 So.2d 102, 107 (citing State v. Labostrie, 358 So.2d 1243 (La.1978)); See also United States v. Riebschlaeger, 528 F.2d 1031, 1032-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lee
State v. LaBostrie, 358 So.2d 1243 (La.1978); see also United States v. Riebschlaeger, 528 F.2d 1031, 1032-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guenther v. Pacific Telecom, Inc.
The certification of a class is questionable “where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass.” 837 F.2d at 990-91 (citations omitted); see also Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) (where unique defenses could conceivably become focus of litigation and divert much of plaintiff’s attention from the suit as a whole, remaining members of class could be severely disadvantaged); Epstein, 1988 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Munn v. McKelvey
Compare, e.g., United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d 831, 832 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) and United States v. Gorham, 523 F.2d 1088, 1096 (D.C.Cir.1975) with United States v. Levy, 153 F.2d 995, 997 (3rd Cir. 1946) and In re Kelly, 350 F.Supp. 1198, 1200 (E.D.Ark.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Haase v. William H. Webster, Director, F.B.I.
See, e.g., Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852, 855-56 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McMahon Books, Inc. v. Willow Grove Associates
See Tober v. Charnita, Inc., 58 F.R.D. 74, 84-85 (M.D.Pa.1973); see also Klemow v. Time, Inc., 466 Pa. 189 , 352 A.2d 12 , 16 n. 17, cert, denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 86 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lieb v. American Motors Corp.
See, e.g., Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); (unique defenses) Kline v. Wolf, 88 F.R.D. 696, 699 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (Weinfeld, J.) (same); Ingram v. O’Bannon, 88 F.R.D. 653, 655 (E.D.Pa.1980) (disparate claims); Greenspan v. Brassler, 78 F.R.D. 130, 132-33 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (MacMahon, J.) (unique defenses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary Thomas Rowe v. Carl Griffin, Etc., Hon. Jesse O. Bryan
See also United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d 831, 832 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), in which the court refused to grant equitable immunity' where the defendant testified before a grand jury pursuant to a plea bargaining agreement, but gave misleading and evasive answers. .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayman Cash Register Co. v. Sarokin
See also Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter- Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); DiFrischia v. New York Central Railroad Company, 279 F.2d 141, 144 (3d Cir. 1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayman Cash Register Company v. Sarokin
See also Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508, 512 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); DiFrischia v. New York Central Railroad Company, 279 F.2d 141, 144 (3d Cir. 1960). 48 A third exception to the law of the case doctrine is that every court "had a duty to apply a supervening rule of law despite its prior decisions to the contrary when the new legal rule is valid and applicable to the issues of the case." Zichy v. City of Philadelphia, 590 F.2d 503, 508 (3d Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrew \Andre\" D'Apice"
See also United States v. Donahey, 529 F.2d 831, 832 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) (immunity for testimony is obtainable only. pursuant to the immunity statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 6001-03 (1976)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McDowell v. Goldschmidt
See, e. g., Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury, 477 F.2d 1223, 1226-27 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1001 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); Charlton v. United States, 412 F.2d 390, 395 (3d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Serrano v. United States
Jankowitz v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 489, 496 , 533 F.2d 538, 542 (1976); Doggett v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 478, 483 (1975); see also Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852, 855 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knollmeyer v. Rudco Industries, Inc.
See also, Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F. 2d 508, 514 (3 Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 91 (1976); Farris Engineering Corp. v. Service Bureau Corp., 406 F. 2d 519, 520-521 (3 Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jane Doe v. Robert E. Hampton, Individually and as Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission
(2×)
See, e. g., Alsbury v. United States Postal Service, 530 F.2d 852, 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976); Polcover v. Secretary of Treasury, supra, 477 F.2d at 1226-27 ; Moore v. Administrator, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 17 , 475 F.2d 1283, 1286 (1973) (per curiam); Charlton v. United States, 412 F.2d 390, 395 (3rd Cir. 1969); Vigil v. Post Office Dept., 406 F.2d 921, 924 (10th Cir. 1969); Meehan v. Macy, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 217 , 232, 392 F.2d 822, 837 , modified on other grounds, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 38 , 425 F.2d 469 (1968); Halsey v. Nitze, 390 F.2d 142, 144 (4…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary, St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary
See also Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 530 F.2d 508 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 85 , 50 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riebschlaeger
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-1765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.