green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harmon
See United States v. Love, 585 F.2d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saya
See United States v. Love, 535 F.2d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Miranda
(2×)
(People v. Wheeler, supra, 68 Cal.App.3d 1056, 1059 ; People v. Davis (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 796, 802, fn. 2 [ 207 Cal.Rptr. 846 ]; see People v. McDaniel (1976) 16 Cal.3d 156, 168, fn. 6 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 467 , 545 P.2d 843 ], cert. den. 429 U.S. 847 [ 50 L.Ed.2d 119 , 97 S.Ct. 131 ].) Accordingly, defendant did not have an absolute right to act as cocounsel in the instant case.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Dean Walker v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of Corrections
(2×)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see Weiland v. Parratt, 530 F.2d 1284, 1289 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,447 United States of America v. Frank E. Jones, James R. Jamerson, and Richard Eugene Webber, Defendants
(2×)
Id. at 403, 94 S.Ct. at 650 ; see United States v. Love, 535 F.2d 1152, 1159 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Vincent Perno
See United States v. Harris, 534 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 132 , 50 L.Ed.2d 120 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Ray Harbin
See United States v. Watts, 532 F.2d 1215 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 131 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gardner v. American Century Mortgage Investors
See United States v. Watts, 532 F.2d 1215 , 1218 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 131 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); United States v. Brown, 495 F.2d 593 , 597 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 965 , 95 S.Ct. 226 , 42 L.Ed.2d 179 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Guy Lonsdale
See United States v. Watts, 532 F.2d 1215 , 1218 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 131 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); United States v. Brown, 495 F.2d 593 , 597 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 965 , 95 S.Ct. 226 , 42 L.Ed.2d 179 (1974) 2 Appellant spells his name "Lonsdale;" the endorsement on the check was spelled "Lonsdeale." 3 Appellant argues in this regard that the misspelling of his name on the endorsement supports his contention that someone else signed his name and uttered the check.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Brewer
See United States v. Love, 535 F.2d 1152, 1156 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. Huttinger
(2×)
United States v. Frick, 588 F.2d 531, 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2013 , 60 L.Ed.2d 385 (1979); see also United States v. Love, 535 F.2d 1152, 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); United States v. Beecroft, 608 F.2d 753, 757 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James W. Menefield v. Robert G. Borg, Warden
See, e.g., People v. McDaniel, 16 Cal.3d 156 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 467 , 545 P.2d 843 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 181 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); People v. Love, 51 Cal.2d 751 , 336 P.2d 169 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bacon
See, e.g., United States v. Harris, 534 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 132 , 50 L.Ed.2d 120 (1976); United States v. Slutsky, 514 F.2d 1222 (2d Cir. 1975); Evalt v. United States, 382 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1967); Fed.R.Crim.P. 33.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
Hill, supra, 526 F.2d at 1024, Swinton, supra, 400 F.Supp. at 806 ; see also People v. McDaniel, Cal.Supr., 16 Cal.3d 156 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 467, 474, n.6 , 545 P.2d 843, 850, n. 6 (1976) (en banc), cert. den. 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 131 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Futrell
Although there is considerable difference of opinion in the federal circuit courts over the introduction of “mugshots” into evidence in criminal trials, see, e. g., United States v. Harrington, 490 F.2d 487, 494 (2d Cir. 1973) (development of a rule of analysis); compare Barnes v. United States, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 318 , 319, 365 F.2d 509, 510 (1966), with United States v. Watts, 532 F.2d 1215, 1217 (8th Cir.), cert, den., 429 U.S. 847 , 97 S.Ct. 131 , 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); see also Annot., 30 A.L.R.3d 908 (1970), our supreme court has established guidelines controlling the admission into ev…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pinkston
v.
Warden, Stateville Correctional Center
v.
Warden, Stateville Correctional Center
No. 75-6818.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.