green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Peterson v. Fox
See Fortune v. Mulherrin, 533 F.2d 21, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976); see also Ritter v. Ross, 992 F.2d 750, 754 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Baca
See State v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107, 110 , 547 P.2d 6, 9 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holden
See Arizona v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107, 109 , 547 P.2d 6, 8 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976); State v. Pilcher, 242 N.W.2d 348, 354-56 (Iowa 1976); Schochet v. State, 75 Md.App. 314 , 541 A2d 183, 185 (1988), rev’d on other grounds 320 Md. 714 , 580 A2d 176 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schad
See State v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107, 109 , 547 P.2d 6, 8 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelly v. State
See, Doe v. Commonwealth, supra, State v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107 , 547 P.2d 6 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 (1976); Carter v. State, 255 Ark. 225 , 500 S.W.2d 368 (1973), cert. denied. 416 U.S. 905 (1974); Dixon v. State, 256 Ind. 266 , 268 N.E.2d 84 (1971); Hughes v. State, 14 Md.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Ray Harbin
See United States v. Jacobson, 536 F.2d 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 171 , 50 L.Ed.2d 144 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coy Hines
See, U.S. v. Jacobson, 536 F.2d 793 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 171 , 50 L.Ed.2d 144 (1977); U.S. v. Tompkins, 487 F.2d 146 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 1952 , 40 L.Ed.2d 296 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
As a result, “principals in the first and second degree and accessories before the fact were treated equally and all were made principals in the first degree.” Potts, 430 So.2d at 902 ; see also Blackburn v. State, 314 So.2d 634, 637 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) (“Thus the terms ‘principal in the second degree’ and ‘accessory before the fact’ appear to have passed into the judicial history of the State of Florida.”), cert. denied, 334 So.2d 603 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schochet v. State
(2×)
See also State v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107, 110-111 , 547 P.2d 6, 9, 10 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976) (two cases, one involving "lewd and lascivious acts" between persons married to each other and the other involving the same type of acts between unmarried individuals; the court construed the Arizona statute as limited to "nonconsensual sexual conduct" with respect to the married couple, but encompassing "sexual activity between two consenting adults in private" with respect to the acts of the unmarried couple; the court upheld the statute as construed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pickett
See, e. g., State v. Bateman, 113 Ariz. 107 , 547 P.2d 6 (dealing with a lewd and lascivious act specified as fellatio only in the Court of Appeals decision), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976); State v. Hill, 104 Ariz. 238 , 450 P.2d 696 (1969); State v. Phillips, 102 Ariz. 377 , 430 P.2d 139 (1967); State v. Superior Court, 78 Ariz. 367 , 280 P.2d 691 (1955); Faber v. State, 62 Ariz. 16 , 152 P.2d 671 (1944).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 76-5045.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.