green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bell v. Martin
See Ryan v. U.S. Lines Co., 303 F. 2d 430 (2d Cir. 1962); Lairsey v. Advance Abrasives Co., 542 F. 2d 928 (5th Cir. 1976); Bank v. Hirsch, 535 F. 2d 343 (6th Cir. 1976); Washington v. Board of Education, 498 F. 2d 11 (7th Cir. 1974); Insurance Co. v. Gelt, 558 F. 2d 1303 (8th Cir. 1977); Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc., 536 F. 2d 862 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 180 , 97 S.Ct. 259 *143 (1976); Anne v. Reynders, 344 F. 2d 835 (10th Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
DANCY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
(2×)
See State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196 , 201 (adopting the standard from Barker), certif. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S. Ct, 259 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
McGonigle v. Combs
(2×)
See Hughes v. Demysey-Tegeler & Co., 534 F.2d 156, 177 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1992
(2×)
See Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., 534 F.2d 156, 177 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976). 17 Even if the comparison was one between apples and oranges, as plaintiffs claim, the PPM made clear that the multiples were derived from the book values of the other companies and from the appraised value of Spendthrift.
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1989
See Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegelen & Co., Inc., 534 F.2d 156, 176-77 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Porter
(2×)
See State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196, 201 , cert. den. 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 180 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Contico International, Inc. v. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Inc.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc., Defendants
(2×)
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1981
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 9 Cir., 1976, 532 F.2d 1266, 1272 , cert. denied, 1976, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (the trier of facts' "Graham findings are binding on appeal if not clearly erroneous").
discussed
Cited "see"
Velo-Bind, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 9 Cir., 1976, 532 F.2d 1266, 1272 , cert. denied, 1976, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (the trier of facts’ “Graham findings are binding on appeal if not clearly erroneous”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Excavation Construction, Inc. v. MacK Financial Corp. (In Re Excavation Construction, Inc.)
(2×)
Matter of Weis Securities, Inc., 5 Collier’s Bankruptcy Cases 471 (S.D.N.Y.1975); see Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc., 536 F.2d 862 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. VEFO Inc.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1270 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Vefo Inc.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1270 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976). 8 Whether there was a single prior art reference in this case involved a genuine issue of material fact.
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. H. M. T.
(2×)
See State v. Szima, 70 N. J. 196, 199-200 (1976), cert. den. 429 U. S. 896 , 97 S. Ct. 259 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State, in Interest of Hmt
(2×)
See State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196, 199-200 (1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 180 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hamlet
(2×)
See State v. Szima, 70 N. J. 196, cert. den. 429 U. S. 896 , 97 S. Ct. 259 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aluminum Co. of America v. Amerola Products Corp.
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976); Schnadig Corp. v. Service Parts, Inc., 494 F.2d 383, 391 (6th Cir. 1974); note 6 supra. On the contrary, it appears to us that the concepts embodied in the uncited pertinent art added significantly to the disclosures contained in the cited references, and justified the district court’s conclusion that the presumption of validity had been overcome or destroyed. 9 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1977
See Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976); Schnadig Corp. v. Service Parts, Inc., 494 F.2d 383, 391 (6th Cir. 1974); note 6 supra. On the contrary, it appears to us that the concepts embodied in the uncited pertinent art added significantly to the disclosures contained in the cited references, and justified the district court's conclusion that the presumption of validity had been overcome or destroyed. 9 III. 12 Amerola contends that the district court's determination of obviousness…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARK K. WELCH (13-03-0294 AND 13-03-0295, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Const. art. 1, ¶ 10; see also Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 222-23 (1967); see also State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re APPLE COMPUTER SECURITIES LITIGATION
(2×)
As this circuit has stated, “[ujnder the securities law a reasoned and justified statement of opinion, one with a sound factual or historical basis, is not actionable.” G & M, Inc. v. Newbern, 488 F.2d 742, 745-46 (9th Cir.1973); see also Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., Inc., 534 F.2d 156, 177 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (finding general statements of opinion not actionable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hoimes
(2×)
See also State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196 (1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 180 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jaffe v. Wavelength, Inc. (In Re Wavelength, Inc.)
(2×)
See also Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc., 536 F.2d 862, 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilden Pump & Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Pressed & Welded Products Co., a Corporation
See id.; see also Saf-Gard Prods., Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266, 1272-73 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 258 , 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stull v. Bayard
(2×)
"The purpose of the Securities Exchange Act is to protect the innocent investor, not one who loses his innocence and then waits to see how his investment turns out before he decides to invoke the provisions of the Act." Royal Air Properties, Inc. v. Smith, 312 F.2d 210, 213-14 (9th Cir. 1962); see also Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., 534 F.2d 156, 175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976); Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 527 F.2d 1141, 1145-46 (2d Cir. 1975); Lowenschuss v. Kane, 520 F.2d 255, 269 (2d Cir. 1975)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stull v. Bayard
(2×)
“The purpose of the Securities Exchange Act is to protect the innocent investor, not one who loses his innocence and then waits to see how his investment turns out before he decides to invoke the provisions of the Act.” Royal Air Properties, Inc. v. Smith, 312 F.2d 210, 213-14 (9th Cir. 1962); see also Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., 534 F.2d 156, 175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896 , 97 S.Ct. 259 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976); Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 527 F.2d 1141, 1145-46 (2d Cir. 1975); Lowenschuss v. Kane, 520 F.2d 255, 269 (2d Cir. 1975).
Griffin
v.
Zurz, Judge
v.
Zurz, Judge
No. 76-266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.