green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1979 ·
…rule 11 does not require that the district court observe any particular ritual
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wilson v. United States
United States v. Abbomonte, 759 F.2d 1065, 1071 (2d Cir.1985) (plea agreement barring prosecution is intended to preclude trial, not merely conviction); United States v. Alessi, supra note 2, 536 F.2d at 980-81 (due process claim based on violation of agreement not to prosecute concerns interests similar to those justifying immediate appealability of double jeopardy claims) (Alessi I); but see United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139, 1152 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976) (Alessi II) (following Alessi I but noting that if issue were open in Circuit it …
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Bird
But see United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jill Renee Bird
But see United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976) 19 Of course, we express no opinion here as to the merits of Ms. Bird's claim that the United States is bound to its agreement not to prosecute her 20 435 U.S. at 860 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. at 1552 n. 7, 56 L.Ed.2d at 27 n. 7
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
United States v. David Strauch
n omission is the equivalent of a false statement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bank of Hawaii v. Wood (In re Wood)
materiality does not require a showing that creditors are harmed by the false statements.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kerby Keller
(2×)
rule 11 does not require that the district court observe any particular ritual
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Joseph Ecker
See United States v. Abbamonte, 759 F.2d [1065, 1070-71 (2d Cir.1985) ], United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139 (2d Cir.) (Alessi III), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Alessi, 536 F.2d 978 (2d Cir.1976) (Alessi I).
cited
Cited "see"
Olympic Arms v. Magaw
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); Gilbert Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence MacChia
See United States v. Abbamonte, 759 F.2d at 1070-71 , United States v. Alessi 544 F.2d 1139 (2d Cir.) (Alessi III), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Alessi 536 F.2d 978 (2d Cir.1976) (Alessi I).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo Lizarraga
See United States v. Cordova, 537 F.2d 1073, 1076 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin L. Wiseman, United States of America v. Center Art Galleries-Hawaii, Inc., United States of America v. William D. Mett
(2×)
See United States v. Cordova, 537 F.2d 1073, 1076 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 (1976) (applies dual sovereignty doctrine directly to claims of Fifth Amendment violations).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arias-Villanueva
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976) (holding that a suppression motion was rendered moot when the evidence seized was excluded on other grounds).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Arias-Villanueva, United States of America v. Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, United States of America v. Adolfo Plancarte-Raya
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976) (holding that a suppression motion was rendered moot when the evidence seized was excluded on other grounds). 24 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kerry Lynn Brown v. United States
See United States v. O'Donnell, 539 F.2d 1233, 1235 (9th Cir.1976) (reading an indictment to a defendant and asking, "Generally, are those facts true?" complied with Rule 11), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 (1976); Guthrie v. United States, 517 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1975) (affirmative answer to the question, "Are you representing to me that you are entering pleas of guilty ... because you in fact did the acts charged by the government?" sufficient to comply with Rule 11).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Robison
See United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139, 1153 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lomax v. United States
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); Barnes v. State, 269 Ind. 76 , 378 N.E.2d 839, 844 (Ind.1978); State v. Robinson, 325 S.W.2d 465, 471 (Mo.1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Copley
See United States v. Cordova, 537 F.2d 1073 , 1076 & n. 2 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Cabral, 475 F.2d 715, 718 (1st Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louella G. Solomon, United States of America v. John Elias Wesley
See United States v. Cordova, 537 F.2d 1073 , 1076 & n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976). *1527 From the indictment, there was a delay of about six months before trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallagher v. State
See United States v. Goldstein, (9th Cir.1976) 532 F.2d 1305 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 , cf. United States v. Thevis, (5th Cir.1982) 665 F.2d 616 , cert. denied 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Diggs, United States of America v. Peter Oliverez
See United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305, 1316 (9th Cir. 1976) (not necessary to show that defendant actually placed phone calls in question when evidence showed she was part of scheme to place calls in violation of statute), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1977). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karyn Rene Walther, United States of America v. Graciela Barba-Barba
See United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); cf. United States v. Stevens, 601 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 232 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reisig
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Stephens, Jr. And Claude Lee Hooper
See United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305, 1314-15 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Martin, 489 F.2d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 948 , 94 S.Ct. 3073 , 41 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974); Phillips v. Pitchess, 451 F.2d 913, 919 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 854 , 93 S.Ct. 187 , 34 L.Ed.2d 97 (1972); Symons v. Klinger, 372 F.2d 47, 50 (9th Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Glickman AKA Hal Glickman, United States of America v. James Rowe
See United States v. Cordova, 537 F.2d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Wycoff, 545 F.2d 679, 682 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1105 , 97 S.Ct. 1135 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert Van Buren
See United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Huffman, 518 F.2d 80, 81 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 864 , 96 S.Ct. 123 , 46 L.Ed.2d 92 (1975); United States v. Powell, 513 F.2d 1249, 1250-51 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 853 , 96 S.Ct. 99 , 46 L.Ed.2d 77 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Holland
See, e.g., United States v. King, 532 F.2d 505, 510 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John A. Grant
Id. (false statement by debtor concerning allegedly worthless property is "material” if it either "bears a relationship to the bankrupt’s business transactions or his estate, ... or pertains to the discovery of assets”) (citing United States v. Jackson, 836 F.2d 324, 329 (7th Cir.1987)); see also United States v. O'Donnell, 539 F.2d 1233, 1237-38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 386 , 50 L.Ed.2d 328 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pemberthy
Super. 322, 332 (Law Div. 1976); see also United States v. Goldstein, 532 F. 2d 1305, 1311 (9th Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 327 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Otis Cantwell, United States of America v. James Arthur Hamilton
See also United States v. Drumwright, 534 F.2d 1383, 1385 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976) (defining a counterfeit obligation within the meaning of § 472 as one “of such character that under favorable circumstances it could be uttered and accepted as genuine”); First National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 347 F.2d 945, 947 (10th Cir.1965) ("the term ‘counterfeit’ means an imitation of an authentic document or writing or a resemblance intended to deceive and to be taken for the original”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donna Dale Coffman, Joan Marie Turner
See also United States v. Drumright, 534 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Gutierrez, 576 F.2d 269 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 954 , 99 S.Ct. 351 , 58 L.Ed.2d 345 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign Corporation
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305, 1311 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976); United States v. Glanzer, 521 F.2d 11, 12 (9th Cir. 1975). 4 The precise holding of Bubis was that the information sought to be suppressed should have been suppressed as the result of interception and divulgence in violation of clause 2 of old § 605.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giskin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-230.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · D. Hawaii (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.