green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bochman v. Town of Cheektowaga
The well-recognized right of children in New York to obtain a free, public school education includes the right to free specialized educational training as may be required (NY Const, art XI, § 1; art VII, § 8; see generally Matter of Wiltwyck School for Boys v Hill , 11 NY2d 182 [1962]; accord Matter of Levy [ City of New York ], 38 NY2d 653, 657-659 [1976], appeal dismissed 429 US 805 , [1976] , reh denied 429 US 966 [1976]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bochman v. Town of Cheektowaga
The well-recognized right of children in New York to obtain a free, public school education includes the right to free specialized educational training as may be required (NY Const, art XI, § 1; art VII, § 8; see generally Matter of Wiltwyck School for Boys v Hill, 11 NY2d 182 [1962]; accord Matter of Levy [City of New York], 38 NY2d 653, 657-659 [1976], appeal dismissed 429 US 805 , [1976], reh denied 429 US 966 [1976]).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas J. Phlipot
See Whitesel, 543 F.2d at 1180 n. 3 (citing United States v. Stockheimer, 385 F.Supp. 979 (W.D.Wis.1974), aff'd, 534 F.2d 331 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 966 (1976)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barry J. Hoffman
See Hill v. State, 393 S.W.2d 901 (Tex.Cr.App.1965). 23 In addition, Hoffman relies upon dicta in United States v. Stockheimer, 385 F.Supp. 979 (W.D.Wis.1974), aff'd without published opinion, 534 F.2d 331 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 397 , 50 L.Ed.2d 335 (1976), to support his argument for a per se rule.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lionti v. Lloyd's Insurance Company
Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b); see Lowenstein v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 536 F.2d 9, 10-12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976) 3 Lionti's loan agreement with First Mortgage included a prepayment penalty clause.
cited
Cited "see"
Lionti v. Lloyd's Insurance
Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b); see Lowenstein v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 536 F.2d 9, 10-12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward J. Rich v. United States Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See and compare Lowenstein v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pennsauken, 536 F.2d 9 (3d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rumson Estates, Inc. v. Mayor of Fair Haven
See, e.g., Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 355 A.2d 550, 559 (D.C.) (remarking that uniformity provision does not prohibit classification which is reasonable so long as regulations are applied to all property throughout district with all owners of same class being treated alike), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976); Montgomery County, Md. v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483, 501 (1977) (observing that uniformity requirement does not prohibit classification within district so long as it is reasonable), cer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. International Paper Co.
(2×)
See also Steed v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 529 F.2d 833 (5th Cir.) (Railroad could recover indemnity from Riegel for FELA payments made to employee hurt at Riegel's unsafe plant), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976). 44 In the case before us, however, the use of the pit cannot, under the SAA, contribute to or detract from Railroad's liability at all, even assuming it did in fact contribute to Newsome's injury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
See, e. g., Steed v. Central of Georgia Railway, 529 F.2d 833 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976); Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co., 183 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1950).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kerry Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
See also Lowenstein v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co., 536 F.2d 9 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied 429 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 396 , 50 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976); Dudding v. Thorpe, 47 F.R.D. 565 (W.D.Pa. 1969).
Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Pennsauken
v.
Lowenstein
v.
Lowenstein
No. 76-437.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1976.
Blackmun, Certiorari.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun and Mr. Justice Powell would grant certiorari.