green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the Comptroller is not bound by a state agency’s interpretation of state’s statutes”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
LeFever v. Commissioner
See Ford v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 558 , 276 F.2d 17 (1960) (refusing to require heirs to use as the basis in inherited stock the valuation selected by the executor where the heirs were minors who resided in Brazil and had no relevant knowledge); but see Hess v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 483 , 537 F.2d 457 (1976) (requiring under the duty of consistency the heirs to use as the basis for inherited stock the value reported by the executor even though the heirs were minors and were not personally involved in reporting the value), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (19…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Community Bank of Sullivan County v. First National Bank of Jeffersonville
the comptroller is not bound by a state agency's interpretation of state's statutes
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Madsen v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
the law is well settled that one must raise the disqualification of the judge at the earliest moment after knowledge of the facts demonstrating the basis for such disqualification.
cited
Cited "see"
Stephanie Leigh-Anne Cull, s/k/a etc. v. CW
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 388 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S. Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977); Gordon, 526 F.2d at 408 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Evan Arthur Hook, in Re Hook in Cv-73-0097-Phx-Cam Alan L. Gluth, in Re Gluth in Cv-84-01626-Phx-Cam Fletcher Charles Casey, Jr., in Re Casey in Cv-90-00054-Phx-Cam v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Evan Arthur Hook, in Re Hook in Cv-73-0097-Phx-Cam Alan L. Gluth, in Re Gluth in Cv-84-01626-Phx-Cam Fletcher Casey, Jr., in Re Casey in Cv-90-00054-Phx-Cam v. Arizona Department of Corrections
See Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 403-04 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977). 38 Lewis contends he could not comply with the district court's orders because the Arizona Legislature has exclusive control over the expenditure of state funds and it did not appropriate funds for the special masters pursuant to section 35-152.
cited
Cited "see"
Hook v. Arizona Department of Corrections
See Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 403-04 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sophia Gordon
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Methodist Home v. Marshall
See Industrial Found, v. Industrial Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 677-78 (Tex.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931, 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Equipment Lease Co. v. United States
See Hess v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 483, 491 , 537 F.2d 457, 461 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227, 230 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962)); Design and Production, Inc. v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 80, 82 (1986); Maddalone v. Okada Shosen, KK, 756 F.2d 886, 887 (1st Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Maul
See Bedell v. State, 541 S.W.2d 297, 297-98 (Ark. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977); State v. Boothe, 284 N.W.2d 206, 208 , aff'd on further review, 285 N.W.2d 760 (Iowa 1979); People v. Pearson, 403 *353 N.W.2d 498, 499-500 (Mich. App. 1987); State v. Netzer, 579 S.W.2d 170, 174 (Mo. App. 1979); State v. Underwood, 281 S.E.2d 491, 493-94 (W.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena 87-2 (MIA) Served Upon Constant
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 384, 393-393 (7th Cir.1976), *1403 ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
(2×)
Bender v. Crawford, 33 Tex. 745 (1870); see Texas Industrial Accident Board v. Industrial Foundation of the South, 526 S.W.2d 211, 220 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1975), aff'd 540 S.W.2d 668 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
Bender v. Crawford, 33 Tex. 745 (1870); see Texas Industrial Accident Board v. Industrial Foundation of the South, 526 S.W.2d 211, 220 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1975), aff'd, 540 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident Board, 540 S.W.2d 668 , 687 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977); Attorney General Opinion JM-672 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
See Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident Board, 540 S.W.2d 668, 687 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977); Attorney General Opinion JM-672 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident Board, 540 S.W.2d 668 , 677 , 683 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
See Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident Board, 540 S.W.2d 668, 677, 683 (Tex. 1976). cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
See Ind. Foundation, Etc. v. Texas Ind. Acc. Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank Of The North Shore v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See First Bank and Trust Co. v. Smith, 509 F.2d 663, 665 (1st Cir.1975), appeal after remand, 545 F.2d 752 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (neither National Banking Act nor Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires Comptroller to hold formal hearing on application to establish branch bank); see also Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 140-41 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1243 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam) (neither National Banking Act nor APA requires Comptroller to hold formal hearing on application to organize new bank); Tollway Arlington National Bank…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of North Shore v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See First Bank and Trust Co. v. Smith, 509 F.2d 663, 665 (1st Cir.1975), appeal after remand, 545 F.2d 752 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (neither National Banking Act nor Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires Comptroller to hold formal hearing on application to establish branch bank); see also Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 140-41 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1243 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam) (neither National Banking Act nor APA requires Comptroller to hold formal hearing on application to organize new bank); Tollway Arlington National Bank…
cited
Cited "see"
Farmhand, Inc. v. Anel Engineering Industries, Inc.
See Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (CA 9, 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmhand, Inc. And Reynolds Module Systems, Inc. v. Anel Engineering Industries, Inc., Farmhand, Inc. And Reynolds Module Systems, Inc. v. Anel Engineering Industries, Inc.
See Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (CA 9, 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977). 28 Id. at 965.
cited
Cited "see"
McMullan v. United States
See Hess v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 483 , 537 F.2d 457 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karen Shapiro, United States of America v. Rebecca Howard
(2×)
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 386 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick
See Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (CA9, 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977); Blackwelder v. Crooks, 151 F.Supp. 26 (D.D.C.1957), rev’d on other grounds, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 290 , 252 F.2d 854 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren Lonnell Harris
Id. at 762 ; see Kannisto v. City & County of San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 844 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Saettele
(2×)
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 386-88 (7th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977). 15 Our disposition of this issue renders it unnecessary for us to determine whether or not the district court erred in denying Saettele's motions concerning immunity for Sargis and Chappel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Apfelbaum
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 385 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977); United States v. DiOrio, 150 F.2d 938 , 939-40 & n. 1 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 771 , 66 S.Ct. 175 , 90 L.Ed. 465 (1945).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Solario
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 389 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph F. Dreitzler, Jr., United States of America v. Ralph F. Dreitzler, Jr.
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 389 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as Charterers
See United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 390 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (citing cases); Satterfield v. Eden- *701 ton-Chowan Board of Education, 530 F.2d 567 , 574 & n.21 (4th Cir. 1975) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard H. Tureen v. Equifax, Inc.
(2×)
See Ind. Foundation, Etc. v. Texas Ind. Acc. Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 683-684 (Tex.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977). 3 In my view, the collection and retention of personal information about a particular consumer by a commercial information broker such as Equifax makes the dissemination of that information sufficiently likely as to meet any reasonable requirement of “publicity.” 4 Equifax, formerly known as Retail Credit Company, has more than 2,000 locations across the continent and is the largest individual consumer investigative firm in the country. 5…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Berardelli
Accord, United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 384-86 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See also, Bedell v. State, 257 Ark. 895 , 521 S.W.2d 200 , cert. den., 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See also, Bedell v. State, 257 Ark. 895 , 521 S.W.2d 200 , cert. den., 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dodd
See, e.g., Bedell v. State, 260 Ark. 401 , 541 S.W.2d 297 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977); People v. Pearson, 157 Mich. App. 68 , 403 N.W.2d 498 (1987); State v. Netzer, 579 S.W.2d 170 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979); State v. Underwood, 168 W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Younkers v. Prince George's County
See also Kannisto v. City and County of San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 843 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (“[A] prohibition against the communication of an officer’s disaffection to rank-and-file members of the department during regular duty hours may be considered as a necessary adjunct to the department’s substantial interest in maintaining discipline, morale and uniformity.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Oliver Hocking
See also United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 389 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Affiliated Companies v. The United States
See also Hess v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 483, 486-87 , 537 F.2d 457, 459 (1976) (tax), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977); D.D.I., Inc. v. United States, 199 Ct.Cl. 380, 384 , 467 F.2d 497, 500 (1972) (tax), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 830 , 94 S.Ct. 61 , 38 L.Ed.2d 65 (1973); Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 169, 194 , 394 F.2d 990, 1003 (1968) (government contract); Glazer Steel Corp. v. United States, 181 Ct.Cl. 1063, 1076 , 388 F.2d 990, 996-97 (1967) (tax).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Scribner
In this circuit, a police department ordinarily will not be governed by the same standard as a school district: "Substantial differences between the public interest in education and the public interest in safety and order justify a difference in the standards by which the respective institutions may protect themselves from ... their employees." Byrd v. Gain, 558 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1977) (refusing to expunge reprimands from personnel files of officers who had issued public statements about the police department's stop-and-frisk tactics), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 55 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Scribner
In this circuit, a police department ordinarily will not be governed by the same standard as a school district; “Substantial differences between the public interest in education and the public interest in safety and order justify a difference in the standards by which the respective institutions may protect themselves from ... their employees.” Byrd v. Gain, 558 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1977) (refusing to expunge reprimands from personnel files of officers who had issued public statements about the police department’s stop-and-frisk tactics), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert P. Shook and Barbara I. Shook v. United States
Compare Ford v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 558 , 276 F.2d 17 (1960) (no control) with Hess v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 483 , 537 F.2d 457 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977) (control).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. Cassel
See e.g., United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 390 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Dunlap
Ed. 2d 283 , 99 S. Ct. 2835 ; see also Bedell v. State (1976), 260 Ark. 401 , 541 S.W.2d 297 , cert. denied (1977), 430 U.S. 931 , 51 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Larry Ray
See, e.g., United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 389 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977). *1128 For the above-stated reasons, therefore, the conviction of the appellant is Affirmed. 1 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Enomoto
See e.g., Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396 , 406 *770 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977); Nelson v. Collins, 659 F.2d 420, 431 (4th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren C. Nelson v. George Collins, John H. X. Washington v. Gerald A. Keller
(2×)
See, e. g., Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (9 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977); Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 531 F.2d 617 , 621 (D.C.Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bonilla
Compare United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 390 (7th Cir. 1976) (citing cases), cert. denied,, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977), with SCA Services, Inc., supra at 117.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antulio Parrilla Bonilla, United States of America v. Judith Berkan, United States of America v. Salvador Tio, United States of America v. William Andres Trevathan
Compare United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381, 390 (7th Cir. 1976) (citing cases), cert. denied,, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1551 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977), with SCA Services, Inc., supra at 117.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unvert v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Hess v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 483 , 537 F.2d 457, 463 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 931 (1977), which applies the three elements laid out in Beltzer. 11 Relying on this doctrine, certain cases have applied the tax benefit rule to a taxpayer who erroneously claimed a deduction in one year, recovered the amount of that deduction in a later year, and then shifted his position in the later year as to the controlling facts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas Industrial Accident Board
v.
Industrial Foundation of the South
v.
Industrial Foundation of the South
No. 76-840.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1) · Utah Supreme Court (1)
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.