green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick P. Joseph
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 373 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977). 57 The government argues that Agent Helminski's testimony regarding George Ray's scheduled polygraph examination was only a passing reference to a scheduled polygraph test of another potential suspect in criminal activity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hector Quintero v. Harry K. Russell, Warden
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 377 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977); United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 912 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 958 (1970). 5 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Carnicle
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 373 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977); see also United States v. Murray, 784 F.2d 188, 189 (6th Cir.1986) ("This Circuit holds an introduction of polygraph material to be error.").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steve Sevenski, (88-5497) Don Veatch, (88-5498) James Majors, (88-5499) Dennis Moore, (88-5503)
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 370 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977). 33 Finally, Moore contends that the government engaged in misconduct when it failed to seek dismissal of the indictment once it learned that Pinkelton had perjured himself before the grand jury.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Woolbright
See United States v. Thurmond, 541 F.2d 774 (8th Cir.1976), cert. den., 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1556 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
(2×)
See United States v. Kelley, 545 F. 2d 619 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 51 L.Ed. 2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Murray
(2×)
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 373 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reed v. Heckler
See McGrath v. Weinberger, 541 F.2d 249, 253 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1557 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); cf. Heckler v. Lopez, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 221, 224 , 78 L.Ed.2d 217 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting in part from memorandum decision denying application to vacate stay).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reed v. Heckler
See McGrath v. Weinberger, 541 F.2d 249, 253 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1557 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); cf. Heckler v. Lopez, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 221, 224 , 78 L.Ed.2d 217 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting in part from memorandum decision denying application to vacate stay).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1984
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 372-73 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); see also United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528 , 534 n. 7 (5th Cir.1979) (limiting Austin in the same manner).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jewell Dean Pickett (83-5252) William Lawrence Hill (83-5253) Donald Ray Polsgrove (83-5254) George Arnold Hardesty (83-5255)
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 374 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Udey
See United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 372-73 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); see also United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528 , 534 n. 7 (5th Cir.1979) (limiting Austin in the same manner).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Raper, Cross-Appellee v. Barry Mintzes, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Thurmond, 541 F.2d 774 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1556 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Lee Wilson, Norman Karl Scott v. United States
See United States v. Kelley, 545 F.2d 619, 623 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 *829 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542, 551-52 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 833 , 92 S.Ct. 82 , 30 L.Ed.2d 63 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Fanello
See United States v. Thurmond, 541 F.2d 774, 776 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1556 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence T. Day. United States of America v. Eric J. Sheffey
(2×)
See United States v. Durcan, 539 F.2d 29, 30 (9th Cir. 1976) (trial court should have compelled Government's acceptance of stipulation by individual accused of smuggling goods from Canada that he had acquired the articles in Canada; improper to allow Government to reject stipulation and instead introduce evidence that the items were stolen in Canada) 12 See notes 8-10 Supra and accompanying text 13 Transcript of Oct. 25, 1977, Hearing at 69-70; see United States v. Kelley, 545 F.2d 619, 623 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (District Court's de…
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Lee Skinner v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden
See United States v. Kelley, 545 F.2d 619, 623 (8 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Marshall, supra at 1361; United States v. Carrion, 463 F.2d 704 (9 Cir. 1972); Enciso v. United States, supra. When, as in this case, the denied cross-examination relates to impeachment of a witness by proof of specific instances of past conduct relevant to credibility, the discretion of the trial court is further bolstered by Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Frank \Jimmy\" Broussard"
United States v. Felix, 112 S. Ct. 1377, 1385 (1992); see also United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 372-73 (6th Cir. 1976) (conspiracy to travel interstate in order to commit arson does not merge with substantive offense of interstate travel to commit arson), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977); United States v. Bradley, 421 F.2d 924, 927-28 (6th Cir. 1970) (defendant may be convicted of and punished for both conspiracy to commit bank robbery and bank robbery). 9 Accordingly, we hereby affirm the district court's judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 173 (E.D.N.Y.1986) (noted the Catch-22 dilemma inherent in this rule but followed it nonetheless), aff'd, 880 F.2d 1319 (2nd Cir.1989); see, e.g., United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 372 (6th Cir.1976) (defense counsel’s “understanding” that there were two grand juries is a mere conclusion lacking the factual support necessary to justify disclosure of the grand jury' proceedings), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Wood, 775 F.Supp. 335, 336-37 (W.D.Ark.1991) (the mere assertion that two grand j…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oberlander
See, e.g., United States v. Kelley, 545 F.2d 619, 623 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bracy
See also United States v. Kelly, 545 F.2d 619 , (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Turcotte, 515 F.2d 145 (2nd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-Cota
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
See also United States v. Fife, 573 F.2d 369, 373 (6th Cir.1976) (distinguishing Austin as a case in which the indictment was drawn in such a way that the substantive offenses "in effect charged the same agreement or concert of action” as charged in the conspiracy), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Garrett
See, e.g., United States v. Morrow, 541 F.2d 1229, 1230-32 (7th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1556 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hively
See also United States v. Kelley, 545 F.2d 619, 623 (8th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1555 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); United States v. Blackwood, 456 F.2d 526, 530 (2d Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 863 , 93 S.Ct. 154 , 34 L.Ed.2d 110 (1972). 4 The extrinsic evidence of the alleged extortion attempt was properly excluded in the exercise of the discretion granted to the court by Rule 403. 5 II.
Coco
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-1129.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.