green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1999 ·
…the granting of a declaratory judgment rests in the sound discretion of the district court exercised in the public interest.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…under established principles of collateral estoppel, any issue of ultimate fact which was actually litigated and necessarily determined in a prior action cannot again be litigated between the same parties
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sheet Metal Division of Capitol District Sheet Metal, Roofing & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. Local Union 38 of the Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n
(2×)
the granting of a declaratory judgment rests in the sound discretion of the district court exercised in the public interest.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Transphase Systems, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
joint efforts to influence public officials do not violate the antitrust laws even though intended to eliminate competition.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of first amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mohammed M. MOOSAVI, Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellee
(2×)
under established principles of collateral estoppel, any issue of ultimate fact which was actually litigated and necessarily determined in a prior action cannot again be litigated between the same parties
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources, Inc.
franchise realty
discussed
Cited "see"
Rabkin v. Dean
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Bd. of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); Lockary v. Kayfetz, 587 F.Supp. 631 (N.D.Cal.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Employers Insurance Company v. Metro Regional Transit Authority
(2×)
See Peabody Coal Co. v. Local Union Nos. 1734, 1508, and 1548, UMW, 484 F.2d 78, 81-82 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied after subsequent appeal, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977) (treating timely appeal from denial of a Rule 59(e) motion as appeal from underlying judgment as well).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mccalden v. California Library Association
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir.1976) (holding that "in any case ... where a plaintiff seeks damages or injunctive relief, or both, for conduct which is prima facie protected by the First Amendment, the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of First Amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required"), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); accord, Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp., 673 F.2d 1171 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. District Council
See Franchise Realty Interstate Group v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir.1976) (holding that “in any case ... where a plaintiff seeks damages or injunctive relief, or both, for conduct which is prima facie protected by the First Amendment, the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of First Amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); accord, Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp., 673 F.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1080-81 (9th Cir.1976) (Fr anchise Realty), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1080-81 (9th Cir.1976) (Franchise Realty ), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riddick v. School Board Of The City Of Norfolk
Los Angeles Branch NAACP, supra; Bronson, supra; see Azalea Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Hanft, 540 F.2d 713 (4th Cir.1976), cert. den. 430 U.S. 941 (1977). 48 Mindful of the Court's admonition in Montana, 440 U.S. p. 163, 99 S.Ct. p. 978, that "[un]reflective invocation of collateral estoppel against parties with an ongoing interest in constitutional issues could freeze doctrine in areas of the law when responsiveness to changing patterns of conduct or social mores is critical," we nevertheless conclude that the district court did not err in finding that its 1975 order was binding upon these par…
discussed
Cited "see"
Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp.
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1085 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corporation
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1085 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977). 32 AFFIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
Riddick v. School Board of Norfolk
Los Angeles Branch NAA CP, supra; Bronson, supra; see Azalea Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Hanft, 540 F.2d 713 (4th Cir.1976), cert. den. 430 U.S. 941 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Association of Data Processing Services Organizations, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a Corporation
(2×)
See generally Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076 , 1081 n.4, 1087 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977). 16 28 Rather, this case involves simply the commencement and maintenance of related infringement actions in what the jury found to be bad faith. 29 A clash between the policies of patent and antitrust laws also was present in Walker Process and Kobe.
discussed
Cited "see"
Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, Department of Education of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
See Cunningham v. Grayson, 541 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 812 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977), rehearing denied, 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1573 , 51 L.Ed.2d 788 (1977); Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Gordon, 521 F.2d 578 (6th Cir. 1975); Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education, 510 F.2d 1358 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 931 , 95 S.Ct. 1658 , 44 L.Ed.2d 88 (1975); Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education, 489 F.2d 925 (6th Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded, 418 U.S. 918 , 94 S.Ct. 3208 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1974). 2 . 28 U.S.C. § 2281 provided: An interlocut…
discussed
Cited "see"
Borys v. Borys
See Borri v. Siverson, 336 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Sup. Ct. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1079 , 97 S.Ct. 824 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 799 (1977), rehearing denied, 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1573 , 51 L.Ed. 2d 789 (1977) (no full faith and credit to foreign custody decree).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freedlander, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina
(2×)
See also Azalea Drive-In Theater, Inc. v. Sargoy, 394 F.Supp. 568, 574 (E.D.Va.1975), reversed on other grounds, 540 F.2d 713 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Willis
(2×)
See also United States v. Rosenfeld, 545 F.2d 98, 102 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1572 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 24 (10th Cir.1975); United States v. West, 511 F.2d 1083, 1088-89 (3d Cir.1975) (J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bulkferts Inc. v. Salatin Inc.
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 513 , 92 S.Ct. 609, 613 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972); Reaemco, supra, 496 F.Supp. at 556 ; First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Association, 541 F.Supp. 1147, 1158-59 (D.S.D.1982); see also, Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1081 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Compare Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977), noted in 30 Vand.L.Rev. 75 (1977) (holding that repeated, baseless opposition before an adjudicative body does not result in loss of Noerr-Pennington immunity absent conduct external to or abusive of the adjudicatory process) with Associated Radio Service Company v. Page Airways, Inc., 414 F.Supp. 1088, 1096 (N.D.Tex.1976) (plaintiff need only be able to show that the defendant initiated proceedings for the sp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levitch v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
See, e. g., Franchise Realty v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); Bethlehem Plaza v. Campbell, 403 F.Supp. 966 (E.D.Pa.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fluhr v. Roberts
See also Cunningham v. Grayson, 541 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 812 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977), reh. den., 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1573 , 51 L.Ed.2d 788 (1977); Incarcerated Men of Allen County Jail v. Fair, 507 F.2d 281, 287 (6th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Bynum, Jr.
Compare Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66, 82 , 87 S.Ct. 793 , 17 L.Ed.2d 737 (White, J., concurring, 1967) and Sanders v. United States, 541 F.2d 190, 194 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1066 , 97 S.Ct. 796 , 50 L.Ed.2d 784 (1977), reh’g denied, 430 U.S. 941 , 97 S.Ct. 1573 , 51 L.Ed.2d 788 (1977), with United States v. Harris, 498 F.2d 1164, 1166-71 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Young v. United States, 419 U.S. 1069 , 95 S.Ct. 655 , 42 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gates, Chairman, Board of Parole of Connecticut
v.
DeLorenzo
v.
DeLorenzo
No. 76-1084.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2) · N.D. New York (2) · C.D. California (1) · D. Hawaii (1) · N.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.