green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 573-74 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Windham Superior Court
(2×)
See United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 659 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Mehau v. Gannett Pacific Corp., 66 Haw. 133, 156 , 658 P.2d 312, 327 (1983); Laws v. Thompson, 78 Md.App. 665, 691 , 554 A.2d 1264, 1277 (1989) (investigative files privilege does not apply when "specific investigation or governmental undertaking ends").
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.
See Rodeway Inns of America, Inc. v. Frank, 541 F.2d 759 , 761 n. 1 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baltimore & Associates, Inc. v. Municipal Escrow & Title Co.
See United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank, 538 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. of New York, 494 F.2d 919 (2d Cir.1974). 2 Riggs argues that it still had the right to exercise a setoff against the funds in METCO’s account after the writ of attachment was served on June 20, 1984.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc. v. Mon River Towing, Inc. And United States of America
See Owens v. United States, 541 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Company
See United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 657 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Hastings v. North East Independent School District, 615 F.2d 628, 631 (5th Cir.1980); Hanley v. James McHugh Construction Co., 419 F.2d 955, 957 (7th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Co.
See United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 657 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Hastings v. North East Independent School District, 615 F.2d 628, 631 (5th Cir.1980); Hanley v. James McHugh Construction Co., 419 F.2d 955, 957 (7th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence Royalston
See United States v. Hultgren, 713 F.2d 79, 88 (5th Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Mitchell, 538 F.2d 1230, 1233 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1578 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Wayne Barbin
See United States v. Mitchell, 538 F.2d 1230, 1233 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1578 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.
See United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 658 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); United States v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 524 F.Supp. 1381 , 1386 n. 14 (D.D.C.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Peoples Nat. Bank of Washington v. United States
See United States v. Citizens & Southern Nat’l Bank, 538 F.2d 1101, 1105-7 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trust Co. of Columbus v. United States
United States v. Weintraub, 613 F.2d 612, 622 (6 Cir.1979), cert. den. 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980); accord, United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank, 538 F.2d 1101 (5 Cir.1976), cert. den. 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Broday v. United States, 455 F.2d 1097 (5 Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States
See, Save Our Invaluable Land (SOIL), Inc. v. Needham, 542 F.2d 539 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States
See, Save Our Invaluable Land (SOIL), Inc. v. Needham, 542 F.2d 539 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of THORNHILL WAY I, Debtor-Appellant
See, Rodeway Inns of America, Inc. v. Frank, 541 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jupiter Painting Contracting Co. v. United States
See United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 659 (6th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977). (c) Agents’ Reports (Documents 1 and 6) The two reports claimed to be privileged, documents 1 and 6, stand on equal footing.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Garfield Brookins, III
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Mitchell, 538 F.2d 1230, 1232 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1578 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Kail, United States of America v. Seymour Bergen, United States of America v. Russell Callahan, United States of America v. Clarence Elden Freeman
See United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 576 (6th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).III 16 After obtaining the wiretap order, government agents installed a pen register to learn the telephone numbers that were dialed on the monitored telephones.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kail
See United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 576 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Grant
(2×)
See United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S. Ct. 1579 , 51 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
All Indian Pueblo Council v. United States
In reviewing a challenge to the adequacy of an EIS, then, our job is not to “second-guess the experts” in policy matters but rather it is to determine “whether the statement is a good faith, objective, and reasonable presentation of the subject areas mandated by NEPA.” Manygoats v. Kleppe, 558 F.2d 556, 560 (10th Cir.1977); see also, e.g., Save Our Invaluable Land (SOIL), Inc. v. Needham, 542 F.2d 539, 542-43 (10th Cir.1976) (explaining “an EIS is to be tested by the concepts of ‘good faith’ and a ‘reasonable’ discussion of the five mandated areas of subject matter”), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
All Indian Pueblo Council v. United States
In reviewing a challenge to the adequacy of an EIS, then, our job is not to "second-guess the experts" in policy matters but rather it is to determine "whether the statement is a good faith, objective, and reasonable presentation of the subject areas mandated by NEPA." Manygoats v. Kleppe, 558 F.2d 556, 560 (10th Cir.1977); see also, e.g., Save Our Invaluable Land (SOIL), Inc. v. Needham, 542 F.2d 539, 542-43 (10th Cir.1976) (explaining "an EIS is to be tested by the concepts of 'good faith' and a 'reasonable' discussion of the five mandated areas of subject matter"), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 94…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruhland v. Gibeault
See e.g., U.S. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); In re Murphy, 560 F.2d 326 (8th Cir.1977); and Duplan Corp. v. Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz, 487 F.2d 480 (4th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peoples National Bank of Washington, a National Banking Association v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank, 538 F.2d 1101, 1107 (5th Cir.1976) (Georgia law), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. of New York, 494 F.2d 919, 922 (2d Cir.1974) (New York law); United States v. Trans-World Bank, 382 F.Supp. 1100, 1104 (C.D.Cal.1974) (California law); see also United States v. First National Bank of Arizona, 348 F.Supp. 388, 389 (D.Ariz.1970), aff’d, 458 F.2d 513 (9th Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambale
See also United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 575-76 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Wilson
Weeks v United States,_US_, 104 S Ct 283 ; see, also, United States v Florea, 541 F2d 568, 572-573, cert den 430 US 945 , reh den 431 US 925 ; Rogers v United States, 422 US 35,40 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grolier Incorporated v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e.g., United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 660 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977) ("Were the work product doctrine an unpenetrable protection against discovery, we would be less willing to apply it to work produced in anticipation of other litigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grolier Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e.g., United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc., 542 F.2d 655, 660 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977) (“Were the work product doctrine an unpenetrable protection against discovery, we would be less willing to apply it to work produced in anticipation of other litigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peoples Gas, Light & Coke Co. v. United States Postal Service
See, e. g., Roadway Inns of America, Inc. v. Frank, 541 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Churchill Truck Lines v. United States, 533 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1976); Clinton Community Hospital v. South Maryland Medical Center, 510 F.2d 1037 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1048 , 95 S.Ct. 2666 , 45 L.Ed.2d 700 (1975); Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peoples Gas, Light And Coke Company v. United States Postal Service
See, e. g., Roadway Inns of America, Inc. v. Frank, 541 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); Churchill Truck Lines v. United States, 533 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1976); Clinton Community Hospital v. South Maryland Medical Center, 510 F.2d 1037 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1048 , 95 S.Ct. 2666 , 45 L.Ed.2d 700 (1975); Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Control Data Corp. v. Baldrige
Compare, e. g., Constructores Civiles de Centroamerica, S.A. v. Hannah, 459 F.2d 1183 (D.C.Cir.1972), and Diggs v. Shultz, 470 F.2d 461 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 931 , 93 S.Ct. 1897 , 36 L.Ed.2d 390 (1973), with Rodeway Inns of America, Inc. v. Frank, 541 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1580 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. The Black Clawson Company, Standard Alliance Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Black Clawson Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 572-73 (6th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977). 82 Ex parte contact between judge and jury raises a presumption of reversible error.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.
See also United States v. Florea, 541 F.2d 568, 572-73 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 945 , 97 S.Ct. 1579 , 51 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitchell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-689.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.