green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
J. H. Cohn & Co. Self-Employment Retirement Trust v. American Appraisal Associates, Inc.
See Dupuy v. Dupuy, 551 F.2d 1005, 1013-20 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 312 , 54 L.Ed.2d 197 (1977); Sunstrand Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp., 553 F.2d at 1044 ; Note, Reliance and Private 10b-5 Actions, 88 Harv.L.Rev. 584, 602 -06 (1975); Comment, A reevaluation of the Due Diligence Requirement for Plaintiffs in Private Actions Under SEC Rule 10b-5, 1978 Wis.L.Rev. 904; but see Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,601 J. H. Cohn & Co. Self-Employment Retirement Trust, Plaintiffs v. American Appraisal Associates, Inc., the Evergreen Fund Inc., on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Hon. Robert W. Warren, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
See Dupuy v. Dupuy, 551 F.2d 1005, 1013-20 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 312 , 54 L.Ed.2d 197 (1977); Sunstrand Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp., 553 F.2d at 1044 ; Note, Reliance and Private 10b-5 Actions, 88 Harv.L.Rev. 584, 602-06 (1975); Comment, A reevaluation of the Due Diligence Requirement for Plaintiffs in Private Actions Under SEC Rule 10b-5, 1978 Wis.L.Rev. 904; but see Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977) 5 There do not appear to be any cases in which a court of appeals issued the writ…
cited
Cited "see"
Hopkinton Drug, Inc. v. CaremarkPCS, L.L.C.
See Schmieder v. Hall, 545 F.2d 768, 771 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1601 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Ritchie v. Landau, 475 F.2d 151 , 156 n. 5 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
TBG, INC. v. Bendis
See Zobrist, 708 F.2d at 1517 (“a plaintiff may not reasonably or justifiably rely on a misrepresentation where its falsity is palpable”) (citing *1560 Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,267 Ralph E. Aschinger v. Columbus Showcase Company, Carl J. Aschinger, Sr.
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Rogen v. Ilikon Corp., 361 F.2d 260, 268 (1st Cir.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Aschinger v. Columbus Showcase Co.
See Holds-worth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Rogen v. Ilikon Corp., 361 F.2d 260, 268 (1st Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paskert v. United States
See Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 712, 713 , 538 F.2d 348 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977), cited with approval in Harris v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 84, 91 (1987), ajfd, 861 F.2d 729 (Fed.Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Burmah Oil Tankers, Ltd. v. Trisun Tankers, Ltd.
See Schmieder v. Hall, 545 F.2d 768, 771 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1601 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Ritchie v. Landau, 475 F.2d 151 , 156 n. 5 (2d Cir.1973). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Norwesco Development Corp.
See Department of Environmental Resources v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 469 Pa. 578 , 367 A.2d 222 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Masri v. Wakefield
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694-95 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc.
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.1976), (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc.
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.1976), (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Teltronics Services, Inc. v. L M Ericsson Telecommunications, Inc.
See Schmeider v. Hall, 545 F.2d 768 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1601 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Locust Point Quarries, Inc.
See Commonwealth v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 469 Pa. *359 578, 367 A.2d 222 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 693-94 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.
See Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 693-94 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ostrer v. Aronwald
See Jacobson v. Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, 544 F.2d 637 (2d Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Fine v. City of New York, supra. The fourth cause of action alleges that appellees have improperly threatened Louis Ostrer that, if he does not provide the Government with certain information about his business associates, they will indict, not only him, but also other members of his family for violations of the tax laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ostrer v. Aronwald
See Jacobson v. Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, 544 F.2d 637 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Fine v. City of New York, supra. 4 The fourth cause of action alleges that appellees have improperly threatened Louis Ostrer that, if he does not provide the Government with certain information about his business associates, they will indict, not only him, but also other members of his family for violations of the tax laws.
cited
Cited "see"
Holmes v. Bateson
Accord, Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 693 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. United States
See e.g., Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 712 , 538 F.2d 348 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastwood v. National Bank of Commerce, Altus, Okl.
See also Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 695 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American General Insurance v. Equitable General Corp.
Compare Dupuy v. Dupuy, 551 F.2d 1005, 1014-20 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 312 , 54 L.Ed.2d 197 (1977) (plaintiff may recover unless reckless in not investigating “in disregard of a risk known to him or so obvious that he must be taken to [be] aware of it, and so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow”), with Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 693 (10th Cir. 1976) cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977) (plaintiff’s lack of due diligence no bar to action after Hochfelder unless plaintiff’s actions constituted “gros…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. United States
See also Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 712 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 (1977); and orders in Borgford v. United States, Wilson v. United States, and Duggan v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 920, 852, 855 (1979), respectively.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jezarian v. Csapo
See, e. g, Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 695 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Chasins v. Smith, Barney & Co., 438 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Foster
See, e.g., People v. Owens (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 83, 90 , cert. denied (1977), 430 U.S. 955 , 51 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rifkin v. Crow
See also the discussion of the "fraud on the market" theory, infra. 2 E. g., Holdsworth v. Strong, 545 F.2d 687, 695 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 , 97 S.Ct. 1600 , 51 L.Ed.2d 805 (1977); Chelsea Associates v. Rapanos, 527 F.2d 1266, 1271 (6th Cir. 1975); Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-381 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); McLean v. Alexander, 420 F.Supp. 1057, 1076 (D.Del.1976); Harriman v. E.I.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haydock
v.
California
v.
California
No. 76-816.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1977.
Published
App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Ventura. Certiorari denied.