green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.6 score
“restatement dr. 6”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Richenberg v. Perry
See CPC International Inc. v. Train, 515 F.2d 1032, 1043-1044 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elaine TRUSKOSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESPN, INC., Defendant-Appellee
It is “peculiarly within the province of the district court ... to determine the meaning of its own order,” Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. Ruben, 957 F.2d 126, 131 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 70 , 121 L.Ed.2d 36 (1992), and the court’s interpretation of its order will not be disturbed “absent a clear abuse of discretion,” Hastert v. Illinois State Board of Election Commissioners, 28 F.3d 1430, 1438 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 426 , 130 L.Ed.2d 340 (1994); see SEC v. Sloan, 535 F.2d 679, 681 (2d Cir.1976) (finding “no basis for substituting our ju…
cited
Cited "see"
Gerlaugh v. Lewis
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 838 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Florencia Y. Walker (92-3135) and Tanya M. Powell (92-3136)
(2×)
See, United States v. King, [ 552 F.2d 833, 842 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977) ] (focusing upon ability of defense counsel to investigate case as opposed to defendants’ [sic] ). 761 F.2d at 1441 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Robertson
See United States v. King , 552 F.2d 833 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); United States v. Singleton , 460 F.2d 1148 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 984 , 93 S.Ct. 1506 , 36 L.Ed.2d 180 (1973); Coffman v. State , 81 Nev. 521 , 407 P.2d 168 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gleaye
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977) ( 18 U.S.C. § 1001 “... is directed at a single evil, i.e. the ‘perversion’ of ‘the authorized functions of governmental departments and agencies ... which might result from the deceptive practices described.’ ”) (quoting United.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gleave
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977) ( 18 U.S.C. § 1001 "... is directed at a single evil, i.e. the `perversion' of `the authorized functions of governmental departments and agencies ... which might result from the deceptive practices described.'") (quoting *265 United States v. Gilliland, 312 U.S. 86, 93 , 61 S.Ct. 518, 522 , 85 L.Ed. 598 (1941)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Singh Mal
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 836-38 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); see also United States v. Shorter, 809 F.2d 54, 57 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 817 , 108 S.Ct. 71 , 98 L.Ed.2d 35 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dirk Mayberry
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833 , 835 n. 2 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); United States v. Anzalone, 766 F.2d 676, 682-83 (1st Cir.1985); United States v. Diogo, 320 F.2d 898, 902 (2d Cir.1963); United States v. Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d 1092, 1096-97 (11th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stella Maudine Nickell
See United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 850 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Sacco
Id. at 600-01 ; see United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 850 (9th Cir.1976) (discretion granted trial judge to reread testimony is large, and determination of whether discretion is abused turns on circumstances of the individual case), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tillman
(2×)
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 835 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977). [52] See State v. Russell, 733 P.2d 162, 165 (Utah 1987) (plurality opinion) (second degree murder); State v. James, 698 P.2d 1161, 1163 (Alaska 1985) (assault); see also State v. Whitney, 108 Wash.2d 506, 511 , 739 P.2d 1150, 1153 (1987) (en banc) (first degree rape). [53] 173 N.Y. 122 , 65 N.E. 989 (1903).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salim
See United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 841 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Kevin Binder
(2×)
See United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 850 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977) (King), see, e.g., Nolan, 700 F.2d at 486 ; United States v. De Luca, 692 F.2d 1277, 1286 (9th Cir.1982) (not abuse of discretion to deny request to reread because district judge is “better able to determine whether the ‘beneficial effects from allowing the jury to review a part of the transcript outweigh the risk that the jury will give undue weight to that part of the evidence.’ ”) (De Luca), quoting United States v. An Article of Drug, 661 F.2d 742, 746 (9t…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Noel Woodward
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1976) (characterizing scope of section 1001 with statement that “[tjhe law of fraud knows no difference between express representation on the one hand and implied misrepresentation or concealment on the other”) (quoting Charles Hughes & Co. v. SEC, 139 F.2d 434, 437 (2d Cir.1943)), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Blake v. Rupe
See Walker v. Cahalan, 542 F.2d 681 (6th Cir. 1976), cert, denied 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1647 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 , where prosecutor was not granted absolute immunity for press release made after there was nothing pending in court because of a nolle prosequi, to which case it pertained. .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray Oliver
(2×)
Accord United States v. Freie, 545 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, Gangadean v. United States, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1645 , 52 L.Ed.2d 356 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Fielding
See, e. g., United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 768-69 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); United States v. Wood, 550 F.2d 435, 441 (9th Cir. 1976); see United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 848-49 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Fielding
See, e. g., United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 768-69 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 981 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); United States v. Wood, 550 F.2d 435, 441 (9th Cir. 1976); see United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 848-9 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton Sherlock
See United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 835 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); cf. United States v. Gipson, 553 F.2d 453, 456-59 (5th Cir. 1977); see generally Comment, United States v. Gipson : Duplicity Denies Right to Unanimous Verdict, 1978 Det.C.L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haro-Espinosa
See United States v. Freie, 545 F.2d 1217, 1221-22 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1645 , 52 L.Ed.2d 356 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians v. Andrus
See CPC International Inc. v. Train, 515 F.2d 1032, 1043-1044 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ca 79-2797 the Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians, and Elijah Whirlwind Horse, President of the Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians Anthony Whirlwind Horse v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Forrest Gerard, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Indian Affairs, George v. Goodwin, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Indian Affairs, the Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians, and Elijah Whirlwind Horse, President of the Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Forrest Gerard, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Indian Affairs, George v. Goodwin, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Indian Affairs, Anthony Whirlwind Horse, Plaintiff-Intervenor
See CPC International Inc. v. Train, 515 F.2d 1032, 1043-1044 (8th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
See United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833 , 846 n. 16 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Corn Refiners Ass'n v. Costle
See CPC Int'l, Inc. v. Train, 540 F.2d 1329, 1338 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Corn Refiners Association, Inc. v. Costle
See CPC Int'l, Inc. v. Train, 540 F.2d 1329, 1338 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Peele
Baker v. Hooker, 496 F.2d 615, 617 (9th Cir. 1974); see United States v. Freie, 545 F.2d 1217, 1224 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1645 , 52 L.Ed.2d 356 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.
See United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 843-44, 846-47 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 245, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,031, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8275 United States of America v. Morreon B. Rude, United States of America v. Stafford Y.L. Mew, United States of America v. Charles E. Andrews, United States of America v. Rodney H.S. Kim
See, e.g., United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 835 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rude
See, e.g., United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 835 (9th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Phrased another way, Industry petitioners claim that the BAT and NSPS levels were improperly promulgated because the environmental benefits of the limitations are negligible. 62 EPA counters that it has discretion whether or not to use cost considerations under BAT and NSPS, and that EPA need only find that the technology is technically and economically achievable and that the cost of the technology is "reasonable." NRDC v. EPA, 863 F.2d at 1426; see also CPC Int'l Inc. v. Train, 540 F.2d 1329, 1341-42 (8th Cir.1976) (setting NSPS does not require cost-benefit analysis, "[w]hat is required ...…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA counters that it has discretion whether or not to use cost considerations under BAT and NSPS, and that EPA need only find that the technology is technically and economically achievable and that the cost of the technology is “reasonable.” NRDC v. EPA, 863 F.2d at 1426; see also CPC Int’l Inc. v. Train, 540 F.2d 1329, 1341-42 (8th Cir.1976) (setting NSPS does not require cost-benefit analysis, “[w]hat is required ... is a thorough study of initial and annual costs and an affirmative conclusion that these costs can be reasonably borne by the industry”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Blume
(2×)
See also United States v King, 552 F2d 833, 851 (CA 9, 1976), cert den 430 US 966 (1977) ("[C]ourts have recognized that the territorial concept of jurisdiction is neither exclusive nor a full and accurate characterization of the powers of states to exercise jurisdiction beyond the confines of their geographical boundaries”); Wheat v State, 734 P2d 1007, 1008 (Alas App, 1987) ("The issue is now well-settled in the modern view that states may rely, without constitutional impediment, on a number of non-territorial grounds as a basis for asserting criminal jurisdiction over acts occurring outsi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Authority of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to Override International Law in Extraterritorial Law Enforcement Activities
See e g , United States v Columba-Colella, 604 F.2d 356, 359 (5th Cir 1979) (collecting cases), United States v King, 552 F2d 833 (9th Cir. 1976), cert denied, 430 U.S. 966 (1977) As the Court held in United States v Bowman, cnminal statutes that are enacted because o f the government’s right to defend itself must apply abroad, otherwise, “to limit their locus to the stnctly territorial junsdiction would ... greatly curtail the scope and usefulness o f the statute ” 260 U.S at 98 Although Bowman involved Congress’ prescnptive power, the Court also applied this pnnciple to an enforcem e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamilton v. State
See also Miller v. State, 32 Md.App. 482, 488 , 361 A.2d 152 , cert. denied 287 Md. 728 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1645 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); Ferrell v. *148 State, 73 Md.App. 627, 641 , 536 A.2d 99 , cert. granted 312 Md. 427 , 540 A.2d 489 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilfred Johnson
Fox v. Capital Co., 299 U.S. 105, 107 , 57 S.Ct. 57, 58 , 81 L.Ed. 67 (1936); see also Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sloan, 535 F.2d 679, 680 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam) (“An order of civil contempt against a party to litigation is not an appealable final order.”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Bartow
App.R. 3(a) (Cum.Supp.1983); NMSA 1978, Crim., Child.Ct., Dom.Rel. & W/C App.R. 203 (Repl.Pamp.1983); see also Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sloan, 535 F.2d 679 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n of Metal Finishers v. Environmental Protection Agency
Instead that section directs the Administrator to consider “the total cost of application of technology in relation to the effluent reduction benefits.” 33 U.S.C. § 1314 (b)(1)(B) (1976); see also CPC International, Inc. v. Train, 540 F.2d 1329, 1341 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Don Bruce Duncan
(2×)
See also United States v. UCO Oil Co., 546 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977) (characterizing coverage of section 1001 as follows: “The law of fraud knows no difference between express misrepresentation on the one hand and implied misrepresentation or concealment on the other.”) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Patrick O'Brien
United States v. Headid, 565 F.2d 1029,1031 (8th Cir. 1977); see also United States v. King, 552 F.2d 833, 849-50 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. Whittaker Corp.
See, e. g., SEC v. Sloan, 535 F.2d 679, 680 (2d Cir. 1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 1646 , 52 L.Ed.2d 357 (1977); In re Berry, 521 F.2d 179, 181 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 928 , 96 S.Ct. 276 , 46 L.Ed.2d 256 (1975); United States v. Watson Chapel Sch.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gangadean
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-961.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1977.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.