green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Sealed Case (Three Cases)
See Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416, 419 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977); accord In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 776 F.2d 1099, 1102 (2d Cir.1985) (although “protection afforded contemnors by the 30-day provision is not jurisdictional,” when the provision is drawn to court’s attention, court should either decide merits immediately if thirty days have elapsed, or release contemnor pending decision).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Grand Jury Proceedings Samuelson
See Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings: Robin Jack Samuelson, Witness Before the Grand Jury, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings: Jay Kenton Samuelson, Witness Before the Grand Jury
See Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 (1977). 5 In their appearances before the grand jury, the Samuelsons refused to answer on the basis of the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings of August, 1984, in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Springfield Division. Appeal of Randall Ghibaudy
See Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416, 418-19 (8th Cir.) (reviewing legislative history), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Grand Jury Proceedings of August, 1984
See Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416, 418-19 (8th Cir.) (reviewing legislative history), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Arizona v. Lacey
See State v. Greenawalt, 128 Ariz. 150 , 624 P.2d 828 (1981) and State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Zaehringer
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1, 5-6 , 559 P.2d 121, 126 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); State v. Smith, 58 Ohio St.2d 344, 348 , 12 Ohio Op.3d 313 , 316-17, 390 N.E.2d 778, 781 (1979) (per curiam), vacated, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3041 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1132 (1980); see Valenzuela v. Griffin, 654 F.2d 707, 709-10 (10th Cir.1981) (per curiam); State v. Dreiling, 601 S.W.2d 660, 661-62 (Mo.Ct.App.1980); Allison v. State, 562 P.2d 883, 885 (Okla.Crim.App.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus T. Baumann v. United States
(2×)
See Chandler v. United States, 401 F.Supp. 658, 659-60 (D.N.J.1975), affd mem., 546 F.2d 415 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1685 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Watson
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (Watson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edwards
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1, 6 , 559 P.2d 121, 126 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); Sigard v. State, 537 S.W.2d 736, 739 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lambright v. Lewis
See e.g., Arizona v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976) (resolving on direct appeal those submitted ineffective assistance of counsel claims that did not raise matters outside the record and directing the trial court to consider submitted colorable claims raising matters outside the record), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); Arizona v. Zuck, 134 Ariz. 509, 515 , 658 P.2d 162, 168 (1982) (en banc) (noting that “[i]n the past, when the issue of competency of trial counsel has been raised, we have always resolved the matter with whatever was before us in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando Lopez
(2×)
Id. at 440; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal. App.3d 102 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265, 301 (1976) (holding prosecutor to ethical rules because he “is no less a member of the State Bar than any other admitted lawyer”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); see also Triple A Mach.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, (Two Cases)
(2×)
Id. at 440; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal.App.3d 102 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265, 301 (1976) (holding prosecutor to ethical rules because he “is no less a member of the State Bar than any other admitted lawyer”), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977); see also Triple A Mach.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury v. Douglas Gassiraro
See, e.g., Melickian v. United States, 547 *1017 F.2d 416, 419 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joe Hunt v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Itc Productions, Inc.
See id.; see also People v. Manson, 61 Cal.App.3d 102, 189-90 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265 (1976) (Los Angeles County, with 7 million inhabitants in 1970, was a populous, heterogeneous metropolitan area capable of supplying satisfactory jury panel for prosecution of Charles Manson for highly publicized crimes), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 , (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Freeman
See also People v. Manson, 132 Cal. Rptr. 265, 335-336 , 61 Cal. App. 3d 102, 216 (1976) cert. den. 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed. 2d 382 (1977) (holding that "statements attributed to trial jurors by others are no more than hearsay or double hearsay and are thus incompetent and insufficient to either impeach a jury verdict or to compel a court to conduct a post-verdict voir dire of the jury.") Moreover, in the instant case, it is not so much a hearsay statement of a juror that is being offered for its truth, but rather an incompetent opinion of a non-juror, Mrs. Ebert, accompanied by…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sealed Case
See, e.g., Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977). 3 We also *752 agree with appellant’s argument that these cases cannot properly be distinguished on the ground that they involved civil contemnors who, unlike appellant, were not already incarcerated by virtue of a prior criminal conviction.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marlon Louis Johnson, Timothy Duane Neal, Witness-Appellant
See, e.g., Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416, 417-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1684 , 52 L.Ed.2d 381 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
(2×)
See also State v. Watson, 114 Ariz. 1 , 559 P.2d 121 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1687 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melickian
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-6169.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1977.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.