Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Bullock, 434 U.S. 1009 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. Bullock, 434 U.S. 1009 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “[i]t has been uniformly held that ‘willfully’ in this context means intentionally committing the act which constitutes the violation”
192 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 49 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Moro v. State of Oregon (or, 2014-01-16) · Strongest negative: Jagdish Rai Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (ca9, 1981-03-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
examined Cited "but see" Jagdish Rai Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1083-89 (Ct.Cl.1977) (en banc) (Skelton, J., dissenting) (finding same section severable), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978).
discussed Cited "but see" Greenspan v. Automobile Club of Michigan
E.D. Mich. · 1980 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Children’s Hospital, 556 F.2d 222 (3rd Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978) (prohibition on use of sick leave not discriminatory in view of Gilbert; no rationale offered); Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 437 F.Supp. 413, 436 (N.D.Calif.1977).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Moro v. State of Oregon
Or. · 2014 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
should we refuse to hear and decide cases, the doors of the courts would be closed to them. this could amount to a denial of due process under the 14th amendment to the constitution.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Whitney v. Securities & Exchange Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t has been uniformly held that 'willfully' in this context means intentionally committing the act which constitutes the violation
cited Cited "see" Hatter v. United States
Fed. Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1044 , 214 Ct.Cl. 186 (1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Donald Hateley, the Cambridge Group, and Wendy Seretan v. Securities and Exchange Commission
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171, 183-85 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978); Beck v. SEC, 430 F.2d 673, 674-75 (6th Cir.1970).
cited Cited "see" Lariscey v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Golder v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 513, 518 (1988); see generally Atkins v. United States, 214 Ct.Cl. 186 , 556 F.2d 1028 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Alexander v. Trustees of Boston University
D. Mass. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Upper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 (2d Cir.1976), reh. denied 551 F.2d 915 (1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978); Power v. United States, 531 F.2d 505, 509 , 209 Ct.Cl. 126 (1976), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1044 , 100 S.Ct. 731 , 62 L.Ed.2d 730 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Romeri
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Keefer, 470 Pa. 142 , 367 A.2d 1082 (1976), cert. denied, Keefer v. Pennsylvania, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 717 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978), reh. denied, 435 U.S. 938 , 98 S.Ct. 1514 , 55 L.Ed.2d 534 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Strann v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
III 1979); see Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1036 (Ct.Cl.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978).
examined Cited "see" Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
SCOTUS · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atkins v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 186, 250-251 , 556 F. 2d 1028, 1063-1064 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1009 (1978); Brief for Petitioner in No. 80-2170, p. 40.
cited Cited "see" Williamson v. General Finance Co. (In Re Williamson)
Bankr. M.D. Ga. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atkins v. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028, 1061 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 59 L.Ed.2d 751 .
cited Cited "see" John P. DECKER, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
10th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 , 180 n.6 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Wellman v. Dickinson
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171, 181-2 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Anderson
Mass. App. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Nettewille, 553 F.2d 903, 914 (5th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1009 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard Cornfeld
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 (2 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978). 13 Andersen is alleged to have "aided and abetted" the aforementioned conspiracy, partly because of its accounting work on the false and misleading prospectus.
cited Cited "see" IIT v. Cornfeld
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 (2 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Charles W. STEADMAN, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 , 180 n. 6 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978); cf. In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. at 550 , 88 S.Ct. at 1226 (disbarment is a penalty).
discussed Cited "see" Porter & Dietsch, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
7th Cir. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 , 182 n. 8 (2d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978). 21 The participation of Chairman Pertschuk and Commissioner Dole in the decision of the case at bar was proper.
cited Cited "see" Porter & Dietsch, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
7th Cir. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Arthur Upper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 , 182 n. 8 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171, 183-85 (2d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Arthur Upper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171, 183-85 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Vicente Meneses-Davila
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Sklaroff, 552 F.2d 1156, 1161-1162 (5th Cir. 1977) (following Chapman), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Pearlstein (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Netterville, 553 F.2d 903, 909 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John R. D'Alessio and D'Alessio Securities, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
In the analogous context of our review of SEC-imposed sanctions, we have refused, on due process grounds, to defer to the Commission’s imposition of sanctions where “doing so would penalize an individual who has not received fair notice of a regulatory violation.” Upton v. SEC, 75 F.3d 92, 98 (2d Cir.1996); see also Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171, 184 (2d Cir.1976) (revising and limiting SEC sanctions where the violations occurred during “years of considerable uncertainty as to the regulatory climate concerning [the violation]”), cer t. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morris D. ENGLISH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., Arthur Lipper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 , 181 n. 7 (2d Cir.1976) (noting that "a finding of actual knowledge [of the law violated] is not necessary for finding criminal liability under [§ 77x] of the Securities Act for ‘willful violations of ... § 77q”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978), with United States v. Gentile, 530 F.2d 461, 470 (2d Cir.) (holding that a district court’s knowingly and willfully instructions under § 77q(a) and § 77x "adequately advised the jury that each defendant had to have actual knowledge he was participatin…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nomination of Sitting Member of Congress to Be Ambassador to Vietnam
OLC · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
It has been said that ” [t]he foremost danger” that the Clause was intended to guard against “ was that legislators would create offices with the expectancy o f occupying them themselves.” Freytag v. Comm'r, 501 U.S. 868, 904 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment); see also Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1070 (Ct. Cl. 1977) (per curiam) ( “ This provision was generated out o f a fear that corruption would result if the legislature multiplied the number or increased the salaries o f public offices for the benefit o f its own members.” ), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1009 (19…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare McCorkle v. United States, 559 F.2d 1258, 1261-62 (4th Cir. 1977) (refusing to determine constitutionality of legislative veto provision in Federal Salary Act because provision is inseverable from remainder of Act), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1011 , 98 S.Ct. 724 , 54 L.Ed.2d 755 (1978), with Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1057-71 (Ct.Cl. 1977) (per curiam) (holding legislative veto provision in Federal Salary Act constitutional, without deciding severability issue), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978), and id. at 1082 n.16 (Shelton, J., concurring in…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare McCorkle v. United States, 559 F.2d 1258, 1261-62 (4th Cir. 1977) (refusing to determine constitutionality of legislative veto provision in Federal Salary Act because provision is inseverable from remainder of Act), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1011 , 98 S.Ct. 724 , 54 L.Ed.2d 755 (1978), with Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028, 1057-71 (Ct.Cl.1977) (per curiam) (holding legislative veto provision in Federal Salary Act constitutional, without deciding severability issue), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978), and id. at 1082 n.16 (Shelton, J., concurring in …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cornfeld v. Investors Overseas Services, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Arthur Upper Corp. v. SEC, 547 F.2d 171 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 719 , 54 L.Ed.2d 752 (1978); King v. United States, 545 F.2d 700 (10th Cir. 1976); In re Colorado Corp., 531 F.2d 463 (10th Cir. 1976); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. 423 U.S. 1018 , 96 S.Ct. 453 , 46 L.Ed.2d 389 (1975); International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 490 F.2d 1334 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 932 , 94 S.Ct. 2644 , 41 L.Ed.2d 236 (1974); IIT v. Cornfeld, 462 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Venture Fund v. Willkie Farr & Gallagher, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gerald Randall Whitaker and Edward Joseph Fitzpatrick (2×)
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Sklaroff, 552 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978); United States v. Davis, 546 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1701 , 52 L.Ed.2d 391 (1977).
General Dynamics Corp.
v.
Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas
No. 76-1645.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
434 U.S. 1009
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #20,114 of 633,719
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · Oregon Supreme Court (1)

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.