green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“federal courts do not review a state’s failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures .... ”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Timothy D. Laughlin and Larry D. Trout
But see Stone v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir.1977) {Doyle applies where defendant testified that he was on his way to the courthouse to turn himself in and cooperate with law enforcement officials when they arrested him), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1019 , 98 S.Ct. 742 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Novia Turkette, Jr., United States of America v. John Vargas
But see United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (panel holding a prostitution ring constituted an enterprise indicated that it was compelled to follow the circuit’s per se rule absent a “clearer and fuller directive from the Court” or an in banc opinion reversing its earlier position).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rodwell v. Singletary
federal courts do not review a state's failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures ....
cited
Cited "see"
Justice v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 561 F.2d 494 , 503–06 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978); see also Mut.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-505 (4th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Anderson v. Foundation for Adv., Educ. and Empl. of American Indians, 155 F.3d 500, 504 (4th Cir.1998) (applying the Wilson test).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Black
(2×)
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, 561 F.2d 494, 503-06 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978) (trial court’s range of discretion is more narrow when imposing most severe sanction in range of sanctions available); Mutual Federal Savings & Loan v. Richards & Assoc., 872 F.2d 88 , 92 (4th Cir. 1989) (when trial court uses most severe sanction, court’s decision “is confronted head-on by the party’s rights to a trial by jury and a fair day in court”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Palenkas
See Stone v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1242, 1245 (5th Cir.1977) (“the relevant distinction to be made ... is between a case involving an attack on a defendant’s exculpatory story and an attack on his behavior subsequent to the alleged crime for which he is being tried”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1019 , 98 S.Ct. 742 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hogue v. Scott
See Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330, 1331 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Nichols & Associates Tryon Properties, Inc.
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 520 (4th Cir.1977) (reversing entry of default judgment because, among other things, the district court "never gave any thought to the possibility of an alternative sanction 'lesser' in effect than one granting default judgment"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978). 20 We accordingly vacate this portion of the bankruptcy court's order and remand the case to the district court with instructions to remand the case to the bankruptcy court to investigate the effectiveness of less drastic sanctions. 21 VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Christopher E. Smith v. U.S. Sprint Susanne Keating Lilian Grant
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 504 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978). 13 A review of the facts reveals the flagrant bad faith and callous disregard exhibited by Smith and his counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Cerrone
(2×)
See United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064 (5th Cir.1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (prostitution ring).
cited
Cited "see"
T. N. Taylor v. Specialty Marketing, Incorporated
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-04 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Ray Piche, United States of America v. Lloyd Ray Piche
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 511 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Burks v. Eagan Real Estate Inc.
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-05 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978), Buckeye Union Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayo v. Commonwealth
See Taylor v. Riddle, 563 F.2d 133, 137 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978) (Defendant’s response that “[Yjou’ve done asked me a question I can’t answer” was held to be an expression of his inability to respond rather than an exercise of his right to remain silent.) Mayo, having broken silence after being advised of his Miranda rights, his statement was admissible.
cited
Cited "see"
Mutual Federal Savings And Loan Association v. Richards & Associates
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-04 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Richards & Associates, Inc.
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-04 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rudolph Jackson, United States of America v. Larry George Deleveaux
See Taylor v. Riddle, 563 F.2d 133, 135 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watson v. State
(2×)
See Taylor v. Riddle, 563 F.2d 133, 136 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed2d 768 (1977); McClinnahan v. United States, 454 A.2d 1340 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sawyers v. State
See Taylor v. Riddle, 563 F.2d 133 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978) (where the defendant contended that his silence, after being given his Miranda warnings, signified his election to remain silent), and Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir.1976) (where the defendant contended his silence and crying during the interrogation compelled a finding that he wished to terminate the questioning). *36 Our review of Texas case law indicates that this exact question has never been considered before.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vernon Neal Hale, Lina Joyce Hale
See United States v. Cook, 557 F.2d 1149, 1152 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 504 (4th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 [ 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 ] (1978); Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp., 427 F.2d 1118, 1127 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 878 [ 91 S.Ct. 118 , 27 L.Ed.2d 115 ] (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillip T. Rea and Judy Rea v. Wichita Mortgage Corporation and Wichita Falls Savings Association, Defendants
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494 , 508 & n. 36 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Greene, 447 F.Supp. at 890 n. 2. 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John Concordia v. J. Thomas Bendekovic, Jr., Lt. G. Simpson, Bruce Lee McCormick Leonard Leo Lanham
“As a general rule, a court in one case will not take judicial notice of its own records in another and distinct case even between the same parties, unless the prior proceedings are introduced into evidence.” Guam Investment Co. v. Central Building, Inc., 288 F.2d 19 (9th Cir.1961); see Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494 , 510 n. 38 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Sardo v. McGrath, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 196 F.2d 20, 22, 23 (1952) (legal memoranda of points and authorities are not mentioned in Rule 56 and cannot be “cla…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles Ward
(2×)
See United States v. Sanders, 563 F.2d 379, 383 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978); United States v. Nims, 524 F.2d 123, 126 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 2646 , 49 L.Ed.2d 385 (1976); Brandom v. United States, 431 F.2d 1391, 1396 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1022 , 91 S.Ct. 586 , 27 L.Ed.2d 634 (1971); Stern v. United States, 409 F.2d 819, 820 (2d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brunson v. Rice (In Re Rice)
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew’s Inc.., 283 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Goodwin v. Balkcom
See, Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Charles Jones v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330, 1331 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978); Willeford v. Estelle, 538 F.2d 1194, 1196 (5th Cir. 1976). 2 Petitioner’s second and third grounds for relief pertain to alleged misconduct on the part of the prosecution.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, Defendants
See United States v. Cook, 557 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (as direct evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
Edith W. Dorey v. Francis Dorey, Etc., Leo E. Costello, Movant-Appellant
See Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. One Stop Staffing, LLC.
Before imposing a sanction under Rule 37(b) or (d), including dismissal or default judgment, the court must apply a four-factor test: “‘(1) whether the non-complying party acted in bad faith; (2) the amount of prejudice that noncompliance caused the adversary; (3) the need for deterrence of the particular sort of non-compliance; and (4) whether less drastic sanctions would have been effective.’” Belk v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 269 F.3d 305 , 348 (4th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-06 (4th Cir.1977), cert. den…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schuster v. Anderson
See, e.g., United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064, 1067-71 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (describing structure of prostitution ring).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Worthington, Unpublished Decision (9-1-2005)
See also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, 561 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vargas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
As stated by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Branan v. Booth, 861 F.2d 1507, 1508 (11th Cir.1988), “[i]n the area of state sentencing guidelines in particular, we consistently have held that federal courts can not review a state’s alleged failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures.” (Emphasis added); see also Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330, 1331 (5th Cir.1977) (“federal courts do not review a state’s failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures .... ”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon v. New England Tractor Trailer Training School
Car lucci v. Piper Aircraft Corp., Inc., 775 F.2d 1440, 1453 (11th Cir.1985); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 505 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Yellow Freight System
See National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639, 643 , 96 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976) (per curiam). “[T]he question, of course, is not whether this Court, or whether the Court of Appeals, would as an original matter have dismissed the action; it is whether the District Court abused its discretion in so doing.” Id. at 642 , 96 S.Ct. at 2780 ; see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 504 (4th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian Coil
Rothenberg v. Security Management Co., Inc., 667 F.2d 958 , 961 n. 8 (11th Cir.1982); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494 , 510 n. 38 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weil v. Seltzer
Fed. 703 , 705 (1981) (when considering evidence under Rule 406 as habit "it has been held that it is necessary to critically examine the ratio of reactions to the situations and to show regularity of conduct by comparison of the number of instances in which any such conduct occurs with the number in which no such conduct takes place") (footnote omitted); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 512 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978). 44 Weil's estate emphasizes the appellant's failure to contradict the testimony of Dr. Seltz…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogler v. Phillips Building Mental Retardation Program
See, e.g., Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494 (4th Cir.1977) (Russell, J.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Culp v. Devlin, 78 F.R.D. 136, 141 (E.D.Pa.1978); CTS Corp. v. Piher Int’l Corp., 59 F.R.D. 394, 395 (N.D.Ill.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weil v. Seltzer
Fed. 703 , 705 (1981) (when considering evidence under Rule 406 as habit “it has been held that it is necessary to critically examine the ratio of reactions to the situations and to show regularity of conduct by comparison of the number of instances in which any such conduct occurs with the number in which no such conduct takes place”) (footnote omitted); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 512 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bey
(2×)
See, e.g., Taylor v. Riddle, 563 F. 2d 133, 137 (4th Cir.1977) (sustaining trial court finding that defendant's statement, "[y]ou've done asked me a question I can't answer," was not an invocation of the right to remain silent), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 768 (1978); State v. LaChappell, supra, 382 N.W. 2d at 348 (trial court properly found that the defendant's statement, "the test was over," was not an invocation of the right to cut off questioning); State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465 , 356 S.E. 2d 279, 298 (1987) (defendant's statement, "I told you everything I know…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Co.
In reviewing the district court’s order “[w]e are left to speculate whether counsel’s delay in answering the interrogatories was caused by the press of other cases, unforeseen difficulty in securing the information, deliberate flouting of the rules, or simply ineptitude.” In re Mac Meekin, 722 F.2d 32, 35 (3d Cir.1983); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, 561 F.2d 494, 505 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Von Der Heydt v. Rogers, 251 F.2d 17, 17 (D.C.Cir.1958) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Company
In reviewing the district court's order "[w]e are left to speculate whether counsel's delay in answering the interrogatories was caused by the press of other cases, unforeseen difficulty in securing the information, deliberate flouting of the rules, or simply ineptitude." In re Mac Meekin, 722 F.2d 32, 35 (3d Cir.1983); see also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, 561 F.2d 494, 505 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Von Der Heydt v. Rogers, 251 F.2d 17, 17 (D.C.Cir.1958) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Falstaff Brewing Corporation, General Brewing Company S & P Company v. Miller Brewing Company, and Philip Morris, Incorporated
(2×)
See also Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 505 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978) (default judgment pursuant to Rule 37 reversed because witness testified he produced everything in his possession and therefore was unable to comply with discovery order); Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 376 F.2d 118, 121-22 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 859 , 89 S.Ct. 131 , 21 L.Ed.2d 127 (1968) (court vacated dismissal pursuant to Rule 37 for failure to produce a witness for purposes of deposing an officer of plaintiff, a bankrupt co…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Potts
Duncan v. State , 369 So.2d 885 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979); see also Nichols v. Estelle , 556 F.2d 1330 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 744 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Escobar
See, e.g., United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064, 1074 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Escobar
See, e.g., United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064, 1074 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bledsoe
See, e.g., United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064, 1067-71 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (describing structure of prostitution ring).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl L. Bledsoe, Jr., United States of America v. Thomas B. Moffitt, Jr., United States of America v. Russell E. Phillips, United States of America v. Ronald Stafford, United States of America v. Quentin Darence Cloninger
See, e.g., United States v. McLaurin, 557 F.2d 1064, 1067-71 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020 , 98 S.Ct. 743 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (describing structure of prostitution ring). 83 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Daniel Williams v. Robert F. Zahradnick and the Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Compare Stone v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1019 , 98 S.Ct. 742 , 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (allegedly improper comments went to question of defendant’s cooperativeness and did not reflect on his innocence or even his exculpatory story); United States v. Sklaroff, 552 F.2d 1156, 1161-62 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1009 , 98 S.Ct. 718 , 54 L.Ed.2d 751 (1978) (spontaneous reference to defendant’s post-arrest silence was harmless when it was irrelevant to issues presented at trial, there having been no exculpatory story told by the defendant);…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wright
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 77-5680.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.