Alley v. United States Court of Appeals for the Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 434 U.S. 1045 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Alley v. United States Court of Appeals for the Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 434 U.S. 1045 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 · ... privilege survives the termination of the marriage. ⚠ not in text
214 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 61 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Witchey (sd, 1986-06-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Witchey (2×)
S.D. · 1986 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
... privilege survives the termination of the marriage.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Mottola
Mass. App. Ct. · 1980 · confidence medium
United States v. Swarovski, 557 F.2d 40, 49 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 *782 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Sadruddin v. City of Newark
D.N.J. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. United States Indus., Inc., 556 F.2d 346 , 351 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Latham v. State
Ark. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 745-46 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 . . . . * * * Brown presents no showing of prejudice from the excusal.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Kraemer (2×)
Colo. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Byrne, 422 F.Supp. 147 (E.D.Pa.1976) modfd on other grounds, 560 F.2d 601 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. BLM Co., Inc.
N.D. Miss. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. U.S. Industries, Inc., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978) (followed Williams and retroactively applied Johnson which required dismissal of plaintiffs case).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Karen Eccles, Cross-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Halbert, 436 F.2d at 1227 ; see United *1362 States v. Swarovski, 557 F.2d 40, 49 (2d Cir.1977) (stating that a defendant upon cross-appeal from an interlocutory appeal authorized by section 3731 “may assert grounds for affirming the order of suppression”), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978); United States v. Moody, 485 F.2d 531, 534 (3d Cir.1973) (observing that where the government’s appeal challenges a district court order suppressing evidence “the defendant can raise issues with regard to findings and rulings relevant to that order under the umbrell…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Eric S. Kelm
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 744 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Marino v. National RR Passenger Corp.(Amtrak)
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. U.S. Industries, 556 F.2d 346 , 351 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Roy Wilson v. Barry Mintzes (2×)
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See, however, United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 744 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Leonard Steven Gaza in No. 83-5909. United States of America v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Arthur Blair Erdlen in No. 83-5929
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cahalane, 560 F.2d 601, 607 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cornell Byrd
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 747 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Fisher, 518 F.2d 836, 840 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 , 96 S.Ct. 565 , 46 L.Ed.2d 407 (1975).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Glasser
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cahalane, 560 F.2d 601, 607 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cahalane, 560 F.2d 601, 606 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Carpenter v. United States
D.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 746 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 408 , 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977), 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
3rd Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978). 60 We also reject the defendant's contention that the district court should have held a post-verdict hearing on what Juror No. 4 wished to communicate to the court as she left the courtroom after the initial poll.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Aimone
3rd Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737 (9th Cir.1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Olga J. FOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EATON CORPORATION, Successor to Eaton, Yale and Towne, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. U.S. Industries, Inc., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 [ 54 L.Ed.2d 796 ] (1978); see also Chappell v. Emco Machine Works Co., 601 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1979) (Wisdom, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sackinger
W.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 751, 753 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Benjamin F. Goodyear and Elizabeth A. Goodyear
4th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Swarovski, 557 F.2d 40, 49 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Jefferson v. H. K. Porter Co.
N.D. Ala. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. U. S. Industries, 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Jones
Mass. App. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 749 (9th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1045 (1978) (array of four or five photos shown to officers without indication of which was suspect not imper-missibly suggestive); United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 , *90 311 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 986 (1977) (showing eight photos of white men to each of three witnesses and asking if they recognized any as the robber not suggestive); United States v. Collins, 559 F.2d 561, 563 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 907 (1977) (photo array of six with subjects of similar age and like hairstyles no…
discussed Cited "see" Herman GONZALEZ, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Page v. U. S. Industries, Inc., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978); Zambuto v. American Telephone & Telegraph, 544 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1977).
cited Cited "see" Earth Resources Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 182 U.S. App.D.C. 295, 306-07, 561 F.2d 293 , 304-05 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978). .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Carl Lutz Wieschenberg and Carl John Heiser, III
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cahalane, 560 F.2d 601, 606 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Maximo Diaz-Burgos
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 751, 753 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Marron, 564 F.2d 867, 871 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Carrion, 457 F.2d 808, 809 (9th Cir. 1972) (per curiam); United States v. Francischine, 512 F.2d 827, 829 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 284 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kelley v. NLRB
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Page v. U.S. Indus., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1977)(EEOC erroneously sent misleading letter), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 (1978); Bracey v. Helene Curtis, 780 F. Supp. -21- 21 568 (N.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Christine Kelley v. National Labor Relations Board
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Page v. U.S. Indus., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir.1977) (EEOC erroneously sent misleading letter), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 1045 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978); Bracey v. Helene Curtis, 780 F.Supp. 568 (N.D.Ill.1982) (EEOC miscalculation of filing date); Roberts v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 661 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.1981) (EEOC affirmatively misconstrued own regulations).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kelley v. NLRB
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Page v. U.S. Indus., 556 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. _______ ____________________ 1977)(EEOC erroneously sent misleading letter), cert. denied, _____ ______ 434 U.S. 1045 (1978); Bracey v. Helene Curtis, 780 F. Supp. _______________________ -21- 21 568 (N.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alton Campbell
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 745-46 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 408 , 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977), 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Zambito, 315 F.2d 266, 269 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 924 , 83 S.Ct. 1524 , 10 L.Ed.2d 423 (1963); Banks v. United States, 204 F.2d 666, 671 (8th Cir.1953), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larry Flynt
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 744 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 408 , 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Brandenfels, 522 F.2d 1259, 1263 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Page v. U. S. Industries, Inc., 556 F.2d 346, 350-51 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978); Zambuto v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 544 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 442, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,851, 10 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1410 Curtis Jackson, W. C. McClendon Lige Scretchen, Nathaniel Cooper and W. E. Parker, Cross-Appellants v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, Cross-Appellee. Curtis Jackson, W. C. McClendon Lige Scretchen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, Co., Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Page v. U. S. Industries, Inc., 556 F.2d 346, 350-51 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978); Zambuto v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 544 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bethel v. Jefferson
D.C. Cir. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Cutliff v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 558 F.2d 803, 806 (5th Cir. 1977) (timely filing with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is jurisdictional requirement under § 706) with Page v. United States Indus., Inc., 556 F.2d 346 , 351 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978) (equitable considerations allow plaintiff to sue under § 706 although complaint was not filed within applicable 90-day period); Swain v. Hoffman, 547 F.2d 921 , 923 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1977) (stating that exhaus-' tion requirements under §§ 706 and 717 are jurisdictional but n…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James A. Bethel, Jr. v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department. Ernest E. Hemby v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department
D.C. Cir. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Cutliff v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 558 F.2d 803, 806 (5th Cir. 1977) (timely filing with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is jurisdictional requirement under § 706) with Page v. United States Indus., Inc., 556 F.2d 346 , 351 (5th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 890 , 54 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978) (equitable considerations allow plaintiff to sue under § 706 although complaint was not filed within applicable 90-day period); Swain v. Hoffman, 547 F.2d 921 , 923 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1977) (stating that exhaustion requirements under §§ 706 and 717 are jurisdictional but noti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alley
v.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
No. 77-5807.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
434 U.S. 1045
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: South Dakota Supreme Court (2)

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.