green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
(2×)
But see Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1190-92 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) (plurality opinion) (indictment precludes liability), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978); Gar mon v. Lumpkin County, 878 F.2d 1406 , 1409 & n. 2 (11th Cir.1989) (citing Rodriguez). .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Houghton v. COUNTY COM'RS OF KENT CTY.
n order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with no mention of amendment and no attempt at amendment shown in the record is a final appealable order....
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacobs
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir. 1977) ("Whether the government should be required to accept defendant's offer to stipulate as to the fact of a prior felony conviction is a discretionary matter with the trial court."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 (1978); United States v. O'Shea, 724 F.2d 1514, 1516-17 (11th Cir. 1984); see also United States v. Dockery, 955 F.2d 50, 54 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orlando Jacobs
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir.1977) ("Whether the government should be required to accept defendant’s offer to stipulate as to the fact of a prior felony conviction is a discretionary matter with the trial court."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. O'Shea, 724 F.2d 1514, 1516-17 (11th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Dockery, 955 F.2d 50, 54 (D.C.Cir.1992) (dictum). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Straughter, Genell Brown, Ladonna Thornton
See United States v. McManus, 560 F.2d 747, 751 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Csx Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union
See Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153 , 1166 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); 13A C.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hale
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael John Grassi, Jr.
See United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); Wright, supra, § 5194 at 198-199.
cited
Cited "see"
Bertman Ames and Gloria Ames v. United States
See Rodriguez *186 v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1193 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978); cf. Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167, 192-93 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Higdon
United States v. Lloyd, 400 F.2d 414, 416 (6th Cir.1968); United States v. Sharp, 778 F.2d 1182 , 1186 n. 5 (6th Cir.1985) (noting that disclosure is usually required when an informant is an “active participant in the events underlying the defendant’s potential criminal liability” and usually not required when the informant is a “mere tipster or introducer”); see, e.g., United States v. McManus, 560 F.2d 747, 751 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978) (affirming the denial of ' disclosure when the informant was not a direct participant in t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gant
(Id.; see also United States v Brinklow, 560 F2d 1003 [10th Cir 1977], cert denied 434 US 1047 [1978]; United States v Rahn, 511 F2d 290 [10th Cir 1975], cert denied 423 US 825 [1975].) In this case, the court finds that the affidavits submitted in support of law enforcement’s application for the search warrants at issue were based upon an observed pattern of drug activity, and detailed the length of law enforcement’s investigation.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S. Ct. 894 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waskey v. Municipality of Anchorage
See also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978) (no federal common law tort of negligent investigation); Landeros v. *345 City of Tucson, 171 Ariz. 474 , 831 P.2d 850 (1992); Johnson v. City of Pacifica, 4 Cal.App.3d 82 , 84 Cal.Rptr. 246 (1970); Montgomery Ward Co. v. Pherson, 129 Colo. 502 , 272 P.2d 643 (1954); Wimer v. State, 122 Idaho 923 , 841 P.2d 453 (1993); and Bromund v. Holt, 24 Wis.2d 336 , 129 N.W.2d 149 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2962, at 614 (1973) ("when a court declines to make a formal ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, but its action has the effect of denying the requested relief, its refusal to issue a specific order will be treated as equivalent to the denial of a preliminary injunction and will be appealable"); see also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977) ("the indefinite continuance amounted to the refusing of an injunction and is appealable"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2962, at 614 (1973) (“when a court declines to make a formal ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, but its action has the effect of denying the requested relief, its refusal to issue a specific order will be treated as equivalent to the denial of a preliminary injunction and will be appeal-able”); see also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977) (“the indefinite continuance amounted to the refusing of an injunction and is appealable”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolo v. General Development Corp.
See also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. Lynd, 301 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 893 , 83 S.Ct. 187 , 9 L.Ed.2d 125 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, City Investing Company Liquidating Trust, Carteret Bancorp, Inc., Carteret Savings Bank, Fa, George T. Scharffenberger, Marshall Manley, Edwin I. Hatch, Eben W. Pyne, Reubin O'd. Askew, Howard L. Clark, Jr., Charles J. Simons, Peter R. Brinckerhoff, Cravath, Swaine, David G. Ormsby, Painewebber Incorporated, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, the Prudential Insurance Company of America, National Bank of Canada, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., First National Bank of Boston, Federal National Mortgage Association, Chase Federal Bank, Fsb, Secor Bank, Fsb, Oxford First Corp., the Oxford Finance Companies, Inc., Stanchart Business Credit, Inc., Harbor Federal Savings and Loan Association, Greyhound Financial Corporation, Lloyds Bank Plc, John Does 1-10. Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, United States District Judge, Nominal
See also Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. Lynd, 301 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 893 , 83 S.Ct. 187 , 9 L.Ed.2d 125 (1962). 32 For an interlocutory order to be immediately appealable under § 1292(a)(1), however, the Rolos "must show more than that the order has the practical effect of refusing an injunction." Carson v. American Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84 , 101 S.Ct. 993, 996 , 67 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garmon v. Lumpkin County
See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1191 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) ("an indictment by a properly constituted grand jury conclusively determines the existence of probable cause and provide the authority for an arrest warrant to issue"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garmon v. Lumpkin County
See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1191 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) ("an indictment by a properly constituted grand jury conclusively determines the existence of probable cause and provide the authority for an arrest warrant to issue”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Scott County Master Docket
Ames, 600 F.2d at 185 ; see also Rodriguez v. Ritchey, 556 F.2d 1185, 1195 (5th Cir.1977) (en banc) (Hill, J. concurring), 4 cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 799 (1978) (officer who maliciously seeks an indictment is not shielded from liability simply by obtaining it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sweitzer v. Hewitt
See also United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1007 (10th Cir.) (with exculpatory accomplice testimony, accomplice charge may well be inappropriate), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pentagon City Coordinating Committee, Inc.
v.
Arlington County Board
v.
Arlington County Board
No. 77-781.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.