green
Positive treatment
10.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
New Jersey State Board of Higher Education v. Board of Directors of Shelton College
But see Bob Jones University v. United States, supra, and Brown v. Dade Christian Schools, 556 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. den., 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 , where religious belief in racial discrimination conflicts with governmental policy. 7 In order to determine the nature of an institution, the State Board requires a statement of educational purpose.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Finasco, Inc. v. Jimmy Thrash and Helen Thrash
See U-Anchor Advert., Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978) (holding that an Oklahoma resident could not be required to defend in Texas where his only contacts with Texas consisted of executing a contract in Oklahoma that stipulated the nonresident’s payments were to be made in Texas); see also Weatherford Artificial Lift Sys., Inc. v. A & E Sys.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Balderas
See United States v. Cantu, 557 F.2d 1173, 1180 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); see also *355 United States v. Acosta De Evans, 531 F.2d 428, 430 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 836 , 97 S.Ct. 103 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); United States v. Lopez, 521 F.2d 437, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 995 , 96 S.Ct. 421 , 46 L.Ed.2d 368 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Eady
See United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S. Ct. 1237 , 55 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Magnolia Gas Co. v. Knight Equipment & Manufacturing Corp.
(2×)
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Eady
See United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S. Ct. 1237 , 55 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Handa-Lopez, Inc.
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 558 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); Stuart, 772 F.2d at 1189 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General Opinion No.
See Magill v. Lynch , 560 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978) (fire fighters of city barred from nonpartisan candidacy for city office; "nonpartisan" elections still had strong partisan overtones, and the prohibition helped to prevent political oppression of public employees and situations in which subordinate city employee runs against employee's supervisor).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. Gibson
(2×)
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex. 1977) (holding that Texas courts could not constitutionally assert general jurisdiction over a defendant which had mailed payments to the plaintiff in Texas under a contract to be performed outside the forum), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Memorial Hospital System v. Fisher Insurance Agency, Inc.
See U-Anchor Adv., Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Franklin v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey David Howard, Ricky Leroy Stanley, Derrick Smith, Samuel J. Cooper, Jr.
See United States v. Dixon, 558 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978); United States v. Sudduth, 457 F.2d 1198 (10th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lujan v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.
(2×)
See U-Anchor Adv., Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Schlobohm v. Schapiro
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Campbell
See United States v. Cantu, 557 F.2d 1173, 1178 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Perez, 489 F.2d 51, 70-71 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 945 , 94 S.Ct. 3067 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974); United States v. Bearden, 423 F.2d 805, 809 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 836 , 91 S.Ct. 73 , 27 L.Ed.2d 68 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Bauers v. Cornett
Accord Magill v. Lynch, 560 F.2d 22 (1977) (interpreting Rhode Island law), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Bauers v. Cornett
Accord Magill v. Lynch, 560 F.2d 22 (1977) (interpreting Rhode Island law), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Francis
See United States v. Dixon, 558 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co.
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 764 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Lee Douglass and James Andrew Babb
See United States v. Dixon, 558 F.2d 919 , 921 n. 1 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Myers v. Emery
(2×)
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978) (article 2031b reaches as far as due process permits).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McGiffen
See United States v. Brand , 556 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir.1977), rehearing denied 561 F.2d 831 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Acevedo v. City of North Pole
(2×)
See Magill v. Lynch, 560 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jim Fox Enterprises, Inc. v. Air France
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); Note, “Long-Arm Jurisdiction: Rule 108 as an Alternative to ‘Doing Business’ Under Article 2012b,” 30 Baylor L.Rev. 99 (1978). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hydrokinetics, Inc. v. Alaska Mechanical, Inc.
(2×)
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, Tex.1977, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jim Fox Enterprises, Inc. v. Air France
See U-Anchor Advertising, Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); Note, “Long-Arm Jurisdiction: Rule 108 as an Alternative to ‘Doing Business’ Under Article 2012b,” 30 Baylor L.Rev. 99 (1978). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. F. Ray Marshall
See Brennan v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 561 F.2d 477, 482-483 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE, Defendant-Appellee
See Brown v. Dade Christian Schools, Inc., 556 F.2d 310, 323 (5th Cir. 1977) (en banc) (Goldberg, J., specially concurring), cer t. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers of America v. Marshall
See Brennan v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 561 F.2d 477, 482-483 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Refrigeration Company, Inc. v. Tranter, Inc.
See, e.g., U-Anchor Advert., Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex. 14 1977) (concluding that defendant who prepared and mailed checks to forum state did not have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978); Magnolia Gas Co., 994 S.W.2d at 691 (“Furthermore, payments sent to the forum state are not determinative.”); see also Stuart v. Spademan, 772 F.2d 1185, 1194 (5th Cir. 1985) (“Spademan’s mailing of payments to the plaintiffs in Texas can hardly be termed significant in terms of determining purposeful availment of the benefits of the forum state…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dr. Evangelos Yfantis v. Michael Balloun, Rainier Company and Patty Balloun
See Coleman , 83 S.W.3d at 808 (holding that contract signed and performed by defendant in Maryland did not support finding of general jurisdiction); see also U-Anchor Adver., Inc. v. Burt , 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex. 1977) (holding that contract solicited, negotiated, and consummated in Oklahoma did not indicate or support an inference that defendant intended to exercise the privilege of doing business in Texas), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1063 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yfantis v. Balloun
See Coleman, 83 S.W.3d at 808 (holding that contract signed and performed by defendant in Maryland did not support finding of general jurisdiction); see also U-Anchor Adver., Inc. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex.1977) (holding that contract solicited, negotiated, and consummated in Oklahoma did not indicate or support an inference that defendant intended to exercise the privilege of doing business in Texas), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dr. Evangelos Yfantis v. Michael Balloun, Rainier Company and Patty Balloun
See Coleman , 83 S.W.3d at 808 (holding that contract signed and performed by defendant in Maryland did not support finding of general jurisdiction); see also U-Anchor Adver., Inc. v. Burt , 553 S.W.2d 760, 763 (Tex. 1977) (holding that contract solicited, negotiated, and consummated in Oklahoma did not indicate or support an inference that defendant intended to exercise the privilege of doing business in Texas), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1063 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janet LaMontagne v. St. Louis Develop.
See, e.g., McCormick v. Edwards, 646 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1017 (1981) (not unconstitutional for a state to dismiss a non-civil service employee for engaging in political activities prohibited for civil service employees), and Magill v. Lynch, 560 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978) (upholding a city charter provision barring city employees from being candidates in even nonpartisan city elections).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janet Lamontagne v. St. Louis Development Corporation, a Missouri Not-For-Profit Corporation, and City of St. Louis, a Municipal Corporation
See, e.g., McCormick v. Edwards, 646 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 552 , 70 L.Ed.2d 415 (1981) (not unconstitutional for a state to dismiss a non-civil service employee for engaging in political activities prohibited for civil service employees), and Magill v. Lynch, 560 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1236 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978) (upholding a city charter provision barring city employees from being candidates in even nonpartisan city elections).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Meyers
(2×)
See Wiggins v. Sargent, 753 F.2d 663, 666 (8th Cir.1985) ("The determination of whether a belief is religious or not is an extremely delicate task which must be approached with caution."); Africa v. Pennsylvania, 662 F.2d 1025, 1031 (3rd Cir.1981) ("[j]udges are ill-equipped to examine the breadth and content of an avowed religion"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 908 , 102 S.Ct. 1756 , 72 L.Ed.2d 165 (1982); United States v. Kauten, 133 F.2d 703, 708 (2d Cir.1943) (recognizing that the definition of religion "is found in the history of the human race and is incapable of compression into a few words")…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Meyers
See Wiggins v. Sargent, 753 F.2d 663, 666 (8th Cir. 1985) ("The determination of whether a belief is religious or not is an extremely delicate task which must be approached with caution."); Africa v. Pennsylvania, 662 F.2d 1025, 1031 (3rd Cir. 1981) ("[j]udges are ill-equipped to examine the breadth and content of an avowed religion"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 908 (1982); United States v. Kauten, 133 F.2d 703, 708 (2d Cir. 1943) (recognizing that the definition of religion "is found in the history of the human race and is incapable of compression into a few words"); see also Brown v. Dade Christ…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Airlines, Inc. v. ROGERSON ATS
See also U-Anchor Advertising v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reed
See, e.g., United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 , 1317 n. 7 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).[ 1 ] We believe that the latter view is the better one and most closely follows the balancing analysis employed by the Supreme Court in Lovasco.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Joseph Bute, United States of America v. Beverly Bute, A/K/A Beverly M. York, A/K/A Beverly M. Jensen
(2×)
Vance v. United States, 676 F.2d 183 , 188 n. 8 (5th Cir.1982); see, e.g., United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312, 1317 (5th Cir.1977) (concluding that when one law enforcement official justifiably enters dwelling without a warrant, later arrivals “may join their colleagues even though the exigent circumstances justifying the initial entry no longer exist”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Green, 474 F.2d 1385, 1390 (5th Cir.) (“Where a lawful intrusion has already occurred ... invasion of privacy is not increased by an additional offi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaw v. State
See also United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); Turner v. Estelle, 515 F.2d 853 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 955 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976); United States v. Smith, 487 F.2d 175 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 846 , 95 S.Ct. 82 , 42 L.Ed.2d 75 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez
See, e.g., United States v. Dixon, 558 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Runnells v. Firestone
See also, U-Anchor Advertising Co. v. Burt, 553 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978) [where the Texas Supreme Court reiterated the three-prong test it propounded in O’Brien v. Lanpar Co., 399 S.W.2d 340, 342 (Tex.1966), the first prong of which requires the non-resident to have purposefully performed some act in Texas] 2 . *849 We first address a sub-point to appellant’s first point of error: her contention that Firestone did business in Texas within the meaning of § 17.042(1) by contracting with her to share the burden of David�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Dickerson v. State of Louisiana
Compare United States v. Durnin, 632 F.2d 1297, 1299 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (requiring the defendant to show both actual prejudice and intentional tactical delay in order to succeed on a due process claim), with United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 , 1317 n. 7 (5th Cir.1977) (rejecting this notion and interpreting Lovasco to require "a sensitive balancing of the government's need for an investigative delay ... against the prejudice asserted by the defendant.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 663 (1978) and United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579, 582 (5th Cir.) (fol…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
See e.g., United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312, 1317 (5th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Doe, 787 F.2d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Mayes, 670 F.2d 126 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1125 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979); United States v. Barone, 330 F.2d 543, 544 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1004 , 84 S.Ct. 1940 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1964); see also United States v. Oyekan, 786 F.2d 832, 839-40 (8th Cir.1986) (rectal examination for pa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricardo Alonza Gomez, Antonio Reyes Espinoza and Gilbert Barnett Hartman
See, e.g., United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Brennan, 538 F.2d 711 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1092 , 97 S.Ct. 1104 , 51 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Church Sanctuary for Illegal Aliens
See also United States v. Cantu, 557 F.2d 1173, 1180 (5th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Young
See also United States v. Brand, 556 F.2d 1312, 1317 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978); United States v. Herndon, 390 F. Supp. 1017, 1021-1022 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.
See also Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Air Lines, Inc., 10 EPD 110,271 (N.D.I11.1975), modified on other grounds and aff’d, 560 F.2d 224 (7th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978), and see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6(e), which provides: Subsequent to March 24, 1972, the Commission shall have authority to investigate and act on a charge of a pattern or practice of discrimination, whether filed by or on behalf of a person claiming to be aggrieved or by a member of the Commission.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca10 1979
See also Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Air Lines, Inc., 10 EPD P 10,271 (N.D.Ill.1975), modified on other grounds and aff'd, 560 F.2d 224 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 , 98 S.Ct. 1237 , 55 L.Ed.2d 764 (1978), and see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6(e), which provides: 93 Subsequent to March 24, 1972, the Commission shall have authority to investigate and act on a charge of a pattern or practice of discrimination, whether filed by or on behalf of a person claiming to be aggrieved or by a member of the Commission.
U-Anchor Advertising, Inc.
v.
Burt, dba Granot Lodge
v.
Burt, dba Granot Lodge
No. 77-614.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1978.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.