green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1980 ·
…a waiver of the confrontation right must be effected personally by an accused who is acting intentionally and knowledgeably. . nd a choice to waive made by counsel not participated in by petitioner does not automatically bar relief to the petitioner.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Harry Stephens, Jr. And Claude Lee Hooper
(2×)
a waiver of the confrontation right must be effected personally by an accused who is acting intentionally and knowledgeably. . nd a choice to waive made by counsel not participated in by petitioner does not automatically bar relief to the petitioner.
discussed
Cited "see"
Newbury v. State
See Freeman v. State, 556 S.W.2d 287, 294 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978). 1 In Freeman , this Court decided that the trial court did not err to refuse the defendant’s requested instruction like the one here where, among other things, the record reflected “that the judge gave extensive instructions to the jury panel” on “matters of reasonable doubt, burden of proof, return of indictment by grand jury, presumption of innocence, and prejudice and opinion” and thereafter “the State and [the defendant] were given the opportunity ..…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stout v. Commonwealth
See Woodard, v. Wainwright, 556 F.2d 781, 785 (5 th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1285 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978) ("[Tjreatment as a juvenile is not an inherent right but one granted by the state legislature, therefore the legislature may restrict or qualify that right as it sees fit, as long as no arbitrary or discriminatory classification is involved.”) 10 .KRS Chapters 600 through 645. 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
Holmes v. State
See King v. State, 553 S.W.2d 105, 107 (Tex.Crim.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lindquist
See State v. Ditmars, 98 Idaho 472, 474 , 567 P.2d 17, 19 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978) (act of sentencing occurs at time court pronounces sentence, not when court orders the sentence to be executed; and when court retains jurisdiction, defendant is not entitled to a hearing at the termination of the retained jurisdiction period); Salsgiver, 112 Idaho at 934 , 736 P.2d at 1388 (sentence is imposed when court pronounces sentence, not when court relinquishes jurisdiction); State v. Omey, 112 Idaho 930, 932 , 736 P.2d 1384, 1386 (Ct.App.1987) (sentenc…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bell
(2×)
Id. at 586 , 416 N.Y.S.2d at 984 (quoting People v. Drayton, 39 N.Y.2d 580, 584 , 385 N.Y.S.2d 1, 3 , 350 N.E.2d 377, 379 (1976)); Jahnke, 692 P.2d at 928-29 , and cases cited therein; see Woodard v. Wainwright, 556 F.2d 781, 785 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1285 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978); Cain, 381 So.2d at 1363 ; Williams, 100 Misc.2d at 186 , 418 N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Callins v. State
(2×)
See Freeman v. State, 556 S.W.2d 287, 307-08 (Tex.Cr.App.1977) cert. denied 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veillon v. Exploration Services, Inc.
See United States v. McGarrity, 559 F.2d 1386, 1388 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978) (finding failure of record to contain all proceedings harmless under the circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veillon v. Exploration Services, Inc.
See United States v. McGarrity, 559 F.2d 1386, 1388 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978) (finding failure of record to contain all pro ceedings harmless under the circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Illinois
(2×)
See Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F. 2d 489, 494 (CA8 1977), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1088 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William John Helmel, United States of America v. Arthur Charl Stowe, United States of America v. Barry Michael Glick, United States of America v. William George Paulsen
(2×)
See Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489, 494 (8th Cir.1977) (unavailability established if declarant asserts fifth amendment privilege), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978). 44 The same concerns are present here.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Helmel
(2×)
See Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489, 494 (8th Cir.1977) (unavailability established if declarant asserts fifth amendment privilege), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Scott Mattes v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and Bronson C. Lafollette, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin
(4×)
See generally Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489, 495 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. State
(2×)
See Freeman v. State, 556 S.W.2d 287, 304 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Grigsby
See Behl, 564 N.W.2d at 567 ; see also Woodard v. Wainwright, 556 F.2d 781, 785 (5th Cir.1977) (explaining “that treatment as a juvenile is not an inherent right but one granted by the state legislature, therefore the legislature may restrict or qualify that right as it sees fit, as long as no arbitrary or discriminatory classification is involved”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1285 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 (1978); State v. Angel C., 245 Conn. 93 , 715 A.2d 652, 662-65 (1998) (explaining that state and federal courts have uniformly held that automatic certification statutes do not creat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Angel C.
(2×)
See, e.g., Woodard v. Wainwright, 556 F.2d 781, 783-84 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S. Ct. 1285 , 55 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rousseau v. State
(2×)
See Lewis v. State, 815 S.W.2d 560 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1296 , 117 L.Ed.2d 519 (1992) (and cases cited therein); see also King v. State, 553 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1284 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Huang
(2×)
See also Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489, 493 (8th Cir.1977) (exception to confrontation requirement allowing use at trial of preliminary hearing testimony of unavailable witness is very narrow), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1283 , 55 L.Ed.2d 793 (1978); United States v. Lynch, 499 F.2d 1011, 1023-25 (D.C.Cir.1974) (dicta concerning violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation rights). *949 In Guadian-Salazar, supra, the court ordered the videotaped depositions of material witnesses.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Bogan
App. 3d 654, 658, 659 [, 368 N.E.2d 1069, 1072 ] ***; see also Woodard v. Wainwright (5th Cir. 1977), 556 F.2d 781, 784 , cert. denied (1978), 434 U.S. 1088 , 55 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Anderson
See e.g., Woodard v. Wainwright, 556 F.2d 781 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1088 , 98 S.Ct. 1285 , 55 L.Ed.2d 794 ; United States v. Bland, 472 F.2d 1329 (D.C.Cir.1972); State v. Sherk, 217 Kan. 726 , 538 P.2d 1399 (1975); State ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Caledonia, Inc. v. Trainor
See, e.g., Phillips v. Wyrick, 558 F.2d 489, 494 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1088 (1978); State v. Yates, 442 S.W.2d 21, 28 (Mo. 1969); see also Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People Ex Rel. Carey v. Cousins
(2×)
Ed. 2d 1134 , 98 S. Ct. 3091 ; see also Woodard v. Wainwright (5th Cir. 1977), 556 F.2d 781, 784 , cert. denied (1978), 434 U.S. 1088 , 55 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phillips
v.
Wyrick, Warden
v.
Wyrick, Warden
No. 77-5576.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1978.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Powell would grant certiorari.