green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“reasonable competency” preferred to “farce and mockery”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Stokes v. Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center
But see Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62, 65 (2nd Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 (1977) (reaffirming the “farce and mockery” standard).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Charles W. Brinkley v. Eugene S. Lefevre
(2×)
But cf. Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977) (modification of the test not necessary because the alleged deficiencies did not amount to ineffectiveness even under the standard of "reasonable competency."). 10 The farce and mockery standard has been rejected in all other circuits in favor of a requirement that counsel for the defense act in a reasonably competent and skillful professional manner: see, e. g., District of Columbia: United States v. De Coster, 487 F.2d 1197 (D.C.Cir.1973); First Circuit: United States …
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Howard Wendy
But see Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62, 67 (2d Cir. 1976) (Oakes, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977). 23 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Worthington Compressors, Inc. v. Costle
the factual issues on competitive loss .. . warrant full evidentiary trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Healey v. People of State of NY
reasonable competency" preferred to "farce and mockery
cited
Cited "see"
Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Food & Drug Administration
See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. GSA, 553 F.2d 1378, 1382-83 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 74 , 54 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Painting Industry of Hawaii Market Recovery Fund v. United States Department of the Air Force
See Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. General Services Administrator, 553 F.2d 1378, 1382-83 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 74 , 54 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977) (holding, under almost identical circumstances, that summary judgment was not appropriate).
cited
Cited "see"
Lee Ratner and John Zuro, Individually and D/B/A the Grant Company v. Sioux Natural Gas Corporation and Sioux Pipeline Corporation
See MacKethan v. Burrus, Cootes & Burrus, 4 Cir.1976, 545 F.2d 1388, 1390 (Wyzanski, J.), cert. denied, 1977, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Gould v. American-Hawaiian S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelito Maniego, Hector Galang, Teodoro Monte
See Rickenbacker v. Warden, Auburn Correctional Facility, 550 F.2d 62, 65-66 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph P. Londrigan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
(2×)
Accord, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. GSA, 180 U.S.App.D.C. 202, 206 , 553 F.2d 1378, 1382 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 74 , 54 L.Ed.2d 84 (1977); Lighting Fixture & Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Patriot's Point Development Authority
See, e.g., MacKethan v. Burns, Cootes & Bums, 545 F.2d 1388, 1390 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977); see also U.S. Indus., Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co., 854 F.2d 1223 , 1236 (10th Cir.1988) (“ ‘One satisfaction rule’ cannot be disputed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 87-1966, 87-2044
See, e.g., Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc., 637 F.2d 77 (2nd Cir.1980) and MacKethan v. Burrus, Cootes, & Burrus, 545 F.2d 1388 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977) (securities cases in which non-settling defendants were granted credit for amount of settlement paid by other defendants).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Union Electric Co.
See, e.g., Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc., 637 F.2d 77 (2nd Cir.1980) and MacKethan v. Burras, Cootes, & Burras, 545 F.2d 1388 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977) (securities cases in which non-settling defendants were granted credit for amount of settlement paid by other defendants).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrett Brock Trapnell v. United States
For example, Judge Oakes recently urged that “the Second Circuit at long last join the rest of the federal judiciary, as well as the leading state courts of last resort, in abandoning the contentless, outmoded farce and mockery rule.” Langone v. Smith, 682 F.2d 287, 289 (2d Cir. 1982) (Oakes, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing in banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 739 , 74 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983); see also Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62, 67-68 (2d Cir.1976) (Oakes, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 , 98 S.Ct. 103 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ramsey
v.
The Modoc
v.
The Modoc
No. 76-1639.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.