green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Persico
But see United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.) (statement that reward depended on “final results” not sufficient to mandate exclusion of testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Persico
But see United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.) (statement that reward depended on "final results" not sufficient to mandate exclusion of testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keister v. Bell
Regardless, the sidewalks are owned by a government and (as Keister has acknowledged in previous briefing) “forum depiction does not turn on ownership.” (Doc. # 10 at 12) (internal citations omitted); see Greer v. Spock, 434 U.S. 828 (1976) (noting that the government permitting citizens to access its land via sidewalks and streets does not automatically convert a nonpublic forum to a public one); Bloedorn, 631 F.3d at 1233 (“Publicly owned or operated property does not become a ‘public forum’ simply because members of the public are permitted to come and go at will.”) (quoting Gra…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rogers Truck Line, Inc. v. United States
See Huerta v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 473 , 484 n. 2, 548 F.2d 343 , 348 n. 2 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 108 , 54 L.Ed.2d 88 (1977). “[A]n interference with the use of property [is not] a compensable taking if it is the result of a sovereign act.” Finks v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 480, 489 , 395 F.2d 999, 1004 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 398 , 21 L.Ed.2d 374 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Malnak
See Huerta v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 473 , 548 F.2d 343 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 (1977) and Somali Development Bank v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 741 , 508 F.2d 817 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. National Labor Relations Board
See generally Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. NLRB (Westchester Marine Shipping Co.), 539 F.2d 554 , 558-59 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 106 , 54 L.Ed.2d 86 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 367 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977); State v. Hart, 72 Ohio App.3d 92 , 593 N.E.2d 463, 467 (1991) ("Courts have previously rejected the notion that the ten-year limitation under Evid.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Huerta v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 473 , 548 F.2d 343 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Marine Division, International Longshoremen's Assn., AFL-CIO
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 76-1686.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 828
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.