green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Cary Lewis Fischer
But see United States *142 v. Nowicki, 870 F.2d 405, 406-07 (7th Cir.1989) and Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193, 1195-96 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schwab
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillman v. Cook
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971). 102 F.3d at 1082-83 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Willis
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willis
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Hernandez-Garcia, 901 F.2d 875, 876-77 (10th Cir.1990) (no plain error to tell jury that case would have to be decided by another jury, rather than leaving open possibility of settlement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erwin v. United States
See Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 204 , 543 F.2d 1298 (F.E.1976) (under constructive termination for convenience doctrine, damages limited to provisions of termination for convenience clause), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the Navy
(2×)
See Kalvar Corp., Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1301-02 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 107 The conjecture that Navy officials might act arbitrarily is not only unwarranted, it is far too weak a reed on which to rest a determination that MSPB must decide which employees of the armed forces should be granted security clearances.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Jerry Ruminer and Ada Ruminer
Pennsylvania v. Ashe, 302 U.S. 51, 55 , 58 S.Ct. 59, 60 , 82 L.Ed. 43 (1937); see Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193, 1196 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Olive S. McEachern v. Office of Personnel Management
See Kalvar Corp., Inc. v. United States, 543 F.2d 1298, 1301-1302 (Ct.Cl.1976), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates
See NLRB v. Midwest Hanger Co., 550 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rojas
See Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977); United States v. Boles, 11 M.J. 195 , 198 n. 5 (C.M.A. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Effie Roy Stansbury, Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry R. Stansbury v. Sikorski Aircraft, Chevron USA
See Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp., 545 F.2d 422 , 432 n.11 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diggin v. United States
This is especially true because when we review a charge of bias against government officials, "It is a well-established rule that [they] are presumed to act in good faith in the performance of their duties.” Schaefer v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. at 548 , 633 F. 2d at 949 ; see Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 192, 198 , 543 F. 2d 1298, 1301-1302 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 830 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karel Plisek
(2×)
See Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193, 1196 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Tama Meat Packing Corp.
(2×)
See NLRB v. Midwest Hanger Co., 550 F.2d 1101, 1105-06 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Morton H. Halperin v. Central Intelligence Agency
See Petitioner’s Brief for Certiorari at 6, Richardson v. Spahr, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 57 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hogan
See Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kisco Co. v. United States
See Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 192, 206 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1306 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 ; United States v. Majors, 490 F.2d 1321 (10th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 932 , 95 S.Ct. 1136 , 43 L.Ed.2d 405 .
cited
Cited "see"
Mahaney v. Air France
See Meyer v. Frank, 550 F.2d 726 , 728 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977); Ortiz v. LaVallee, 442 F.2d 912, 914 (2d Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Dairy Sales Corp. v. United States
See Kalvar Corporation, Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 192 , 543 F. 2d 1298 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 (1977) and William Green Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Digital Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Instead, the contractor may recover traditional breach of contract damages.” Keeter Trading Co. v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. at 263 (citing Torncello v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 20 , 681 F.2d 756, 772 (1982)); see also Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 204 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1304 (1976) (“In the absence of bad faith or clear abuse of discretion, the effect of the constructive termination for convenience is to moot all breach claims and to limit recovery to costs which would have been allowed had the contracting officer actually invoked the [termination for the convenience of th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mega Construction Co. v. United States
See also Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192 , 543 F.2d 1298 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); William Green Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shields Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
See also Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 198-99 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1302 (1976), cert. den., 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977) (stating that “[i]n the cases where the court has considered allegations of bad faith, the necessary ‘irrefragable proof’ has been equated with evidence of some specific intent to injure the plaintiff.”) Although plaintiff alleges in its complaint that the defendant failed to exercise good faith when evaluating plaintiff’s proposal and when cancelling the Request for Proposals in violation of the Keco II criteria, after reviewing …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)
See also United States v. Mocciola, 891 F.2d 13, 16 (1st Cir.1989). 82 The right to be informed of the nature and the full extent and implications of criminal charges is deemed essential for the trial process, but applies in sentencing only if an entirely new and more serious charge is added at sentencing without notice or "any 'hearing in the normal sense.' " See Specht v. Patterson, 386 U.S. 605, 608 , 87 S.Ct. 1209, 1211 , 18 L.Ed.2d 326 (1967), as described in McMillan, 477 U.S. at 88-89 , 106 S.Ct. at 2417 . 83 In Robinson, we discussed the type of evidence made available and relied upon …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter L. Reazin, M.D. Hca Health Services of Kansas, Inc., D/B/A Wesley Medical Center Health Care Plus, Inc. And New Century Life Insurance Co. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., and Counterclaim and Hmo Kansas, Inc., Additional Counterclaim v. Hospital Corporation of America, Additional Counterclaim
See, e.g., United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Munroe v. United States, 424 F.2d 243, 245-46 (10th Cir.1970); United States v. Wynn, 415 F.2d 135, 137 (10th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1133 , 25 L.Ed.2d 402 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Munroe v. United States, 424 F.2d 243, 245-46 (10th Cir.1970); United States v. Wynn, 415 F.2d 135, 137 (10th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1133 , 25 L.Ed.2d 402 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salsbury Industries v. United States
See also, Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 198-99 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1302 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 (1977); Descon System, Ltd. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 410, 413 (1984). 10 Conclusion In sum, defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is sufficient to demonstrate the absence of any dispute as to a material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Gardner
Trial judges may rely on a broad range of information, including “alleged criminal activity for which the defendant has not been prosecuted, illegally obtained evidence and hearsay evidence.” United States v. Plisek, 657 F.2d 920, 926 (7th Cir.1981) (citations omitted); see also Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193, 1195-96 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wesley R. McKinney
See, e.g., United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Munroe v. United States, 424 F.2d 243 (10th Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Speros v. United States
See, e.g., Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 198 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1301-02 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Archie Burton and Andrew Ryder
See, e.g., United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 422 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 ; United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 232 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harpp v. General Electric Co.
See also Kowalik v. General Marine Transport Corp., 411 F.Supp. 1325 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d, 550 F.2d 770 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(2×)
See, e. g., NLRB v. Midwest Hanger Co., 550 F. 2d 1101, 1103 (CA8) (“It is clear that had the Company’s offer of reinstatement been conditioned solely on its refusal to give back pay, as the Company strenuously argues, then the offer of reinstatement would not have been invalidated”), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 830 (1977); Reliance Clay Products Co., 105 N. L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. Guy
See also Meyer v. Frank, 550 F.2d 726, 730 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978), citing Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 321 U.S. 342, 348-49 , 64 S.Ct. 582, 586 , 88 L.Ed. 788 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boles
Compare Smith v. United States, 551 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977), with Article 36(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 836 (a), and para. 75, Manual, supra. .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marin v. New York State Department of Labor
See, e. g., Meyer v. Frank, 550 F.2d 726 , 728 n.5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977); Reynolds v. Ross, 79 Civ. 592 (N.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calkins v. Blum
See, e. g., Meyer v. Frank, 550 F.2d 726, 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977). “[Rjelief under the Civil Rights Act may not be defeated because relief was not first sought under state law which provided a remedy.” McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. at 671 , 83 S.Ct. at 1435 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ganguly v. New York State Department of Mental Hygiene-Dunlap Manhattan Psychiatric Center
See, e. g., Meyer v. Frank, 550 F.2d at 728, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977); EEOC v. Enterprise Ass’n Steamfitters Local 638, 542 F.2d 579, 590 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korinis v. Sealand Services, Inc.
See U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Arguelles, 400 U.S. at 352 , 91 S.Ct. at 410 (claims for “basic” and “overtime” wages); Monteiro v. Sociedad Maritima San Nicolas, S. A., 280 F.2d at 573; compare Kowalik v. General Marine Transport Corp., 550 F.2d 770 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 2 See also Suissa v. American Export Lines, Inc., 507 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1974) (claim for overtime wages considered under section 596 but rejected on ground that withholding was not without sufficient cause).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Higginbotham, Administratrix
v.
Mobil Oil Corp. and Long, Administratrix v. Bell Helicopter Co.
v.
Mobil Oil Corp. and Long, Administratrix v. Bell Helicopter Co.
No. 76-1722; No. 76-1725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 830
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 545 F. 2d 422.