green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Thomas E. Lister v. Patrick J. Lucey
But cf. 28 East Jackson Enterprises Inc. v. Cullerton, 551 F.2d 1093, 1096 (7th Cir. 1977), certiorari denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 123 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (England reservation under 28 U.S.C. § 1341 ). 17 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Blessing v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But cf. First National Bank v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 375-76 (10th Cir.) (Involving agency approval of fungicide label under statutory standard that label must contain statements “necessary and, if complied with, adequate to prevent injury.” “To enforce these standards, and give content and meaning to them, the agency was required to make policy judgments in evaluating the adequacy of the labeling.” Such judgments were held to be within the exception.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Lee Stringfield v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
See Multi-Medical Convalescent and Nursing Center of Towson v. N.L.R.B., 550 F.2d 974, 977 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 (1977) ("It has long been settled (footnote omitted) that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment in a nonjury case because of the admission of incompetent evidence, unless all of the competent evidence is insufficient to support the judgment or unless it affirmatively appears that the incompetent evidence induced the court to make an essential finding which could not have otherwise have been made.") 39 For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that the …
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Maidsville Coal Company, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See NLRB v. Appletree Chevrolet, Inc., 671 F.2d 838 (1982) 6 In pertinent part, this provision states that upon a proper showing, we "may order ... additional evidence to be taken before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, and to be made a part of the record." 1 See, e.g., Multi-Medical Convalescent and Nursing Center v. NLRB, 550 F.2d 974 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 124 , 54 L.Ed.2d 97 (1977), (where a bargaining order in response to less egregious and pervasive unfair labor practices than are present here was approved): "It is clear that where practices have been e…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenai Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Department of the Interior
See Arizona Power Authority v. Morton, 549 F.2d 1231 , 1239-41 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 124 , 54 L.Ed.2d 97 (1977); Sessions Inc. v. Morton, 348 F.Supp. 694, 699 (C.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 491 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Moody Equipment & Supply Co. v. Union National Bank
See Franco v. Bunyard, 261 Ark. 144 , 547 S.W. 2d 91 (1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 835 (1977); Hartsock v. Forsgren, 236 Ark. 167 , 365 S.W. 2d 117 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baird v. United States
See First National Bank v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Smith v. United States, 546 F.2d 872, 875-76 (10th Cir. 1976); cf. United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 , 100 S.Ct. 352 , 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979) (time limitation on sovereign’s consent to suit; 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b)); Knapp v. United States, 636 F.2d 279 (10th Cir. 1980) (same; 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(f)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Galen J. Baird v. United States v. Capitol Air Service, Inc. And Vanguard Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellants. And Capitol Air Service, Inc. And Vanguard Insurance Company v. United States
See First National Bank v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Smith v. United States, 546 F.2d 872, 875-76 (10th Cir. 1976); cf. United States v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111 , 100 S.Ct. 352 , 62 L.Ed.2d 259 (1979) (time limitation on sovereign's consent to suit; 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b)); Knapp v. United States, 636 F.2d 279 (10th Cir. 1980) (same; 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(f)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
In re Air Crash Disaster Near Silver Plume, Colorado, 445 F.Supp. 384, 401-04 (D.Kan.1977); see First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 375-76 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
In re Air Crash Disaster Near Silver Plume, Colorado, 445 F.Supp. 384, 401-04 (D.Kan.1977); see First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 375-76 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. United States
See, Smith v. United States, 546 F.2d 872 (10th Cir. 1976) and cases cited therein at 877 and compare First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States, 552 F.2d 370 (10th Cir.) cert. denied 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Spillway Marina, Inc. v. United States, 445 F.2d 876 (10th Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Burgess v. Mitchell Motors, Inc.
See 28 East Jackson Enterprises, Inc. v. Cullerton, 551 F.2d 1093 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 123 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Godoy v. Gullotta, 406 F.Supp. 692 (S.D.N.Y.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baum v. United States
See also, First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 374-77 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Downs v. United States, 522 F.2d 990, 997 (6th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas R. Brimberry
See also United States v. McDonnel, 550 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir.) (where defendant did not object during trial to testimony that arguably violated statutory provision dealing with use immunity for bankrupts, defendant did not demonstrate that plain error was committed), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 123 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Floyd R. Bell
See also United States v. McDonnel, 550 F.2d 1010, 1012 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 123 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. Army
See, e. g., First National Bank v. United States, 552 F.2d 370, 374 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1977); Smith v. United States, 546 F.2d 872, 876 (10th Cir. 1976); Gibson v. United States, 457 F.2d 1391 , 1392 n.1 (3d Cir. 1972); Konecny v. United States, 388 F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1967); Sanchez Tapia v. United States, 338 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1964); Summers v. United States, 480 F.Supp. 347, 349 (D.Md.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DePass v. United States
See, e. g., First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States, 552 F.2d 370 , 375 — 76 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 835 , 98 S.Ct. 122 , 54 L.Ed.2d 96 (1978) (discretionary function exception applies where federal statute phrased in terms of general policy standards to be applied by the agency); Hendry v. United States, 418 F.2d 774, 783 (2d Cir. 1969) (discretionary function exception applies where governing statute or regulation comtemplates that an official will make new rules or ad hoc decisions); Coastwise Packet Co. v. United States, 398 F.2d 77, 79-80 (1st Cir.), cert. d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First National Bank in Albuquerque, Guardian
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-1819.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.