green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lubbock Feed Lots, Inc., and Lockney Cooperative Gin v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
The Valley View Question IBP argues with great vigor that this court’s recent decision in Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 551 F.2d 865 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 *261 (1977) “infected” the trial and ultimate result in this case with an interpretation of Texas agency law that is blatantly incorrect.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edward B.
(2×)
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 557 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
(2×)
Although we previously followed Jones in applying the automatic standing rule to claims under the federal constitution; see State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alice Paulette Pagan v. Shoney's, Inc.
(2×)
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 , 1220 n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
(2×)
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 559 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence R. Alberti, Cross-Appellants v. Johnny Klevenhagen, Cross-Appellees
See In re M/V Vulcan, 553 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Sabine Towing and Transportation Co. v. Zapata Ugland Drilling Inc., 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 175 , 54 L.Ed.2d 127 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Insurance Co. of North America v. M/V FRIO BRAZIL
See Complaint of M/V Vulcan, 553 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 175 , 54 L.Ed.2d 127 (1977); Reeled Tubing, Inc. v. M/V Chad G, 794 F.2d 1026, 1029 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Ashley
(2×)
See United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.1977) (prior experience of agents relevant in determining whether other investigative procedures unlikely to succeed), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); United States v. Rodriguez, 606 F.Supp. 1363, 1368 (D.Mass.1985) (same); cf. United States v. Hoffman, 832 F.2d at 1306 (court may weigh experience of agents in balance in assessing probable cause for issuance of wiretap).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitfield v. Lindemann
See Sabine Towing and Transportation Co. v. Zapata Ugland Drilling, Inc., 553 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 175 , 54 L.Ed.2d 127 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitfield v. Lindemann
See Sabine Towing and Transportation Co. v. Zapata Ugland Drilling, Inc., 553 F.2d 489,491 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 175 , 54 L.Ed.2d 127 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Higgins
(2×)
See State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 560 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.
See Sabine Towing and Transportation Co. v. Zapata Ugland Drilling, Inc., 553 F.2d 489 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 175 , 54 L.Ed.2d 127 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey
(2×)
See United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); United States v. Anderson, 542 F.2d 428, 431 (7th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company
(2×)
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 528 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1976); Urti v. Transport Commercial Corp., 479 F.2d 766 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
(2×)
See Valley View Cattle Co. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 548 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 528 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1976); Urti v. Transport Commercial Corp., 479 F.2d 766 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore A. Williams, A/K/A \Sonny.\" United States of America v. Salvatore C. Williams
(2×)
Furthermore, in determining whether this requirement has been satisfied, a court "may properly take into account affirmations which are founded in part upon the experience of specially trained agents." United States v. Ashley, 876 F.2d 1069, 1072 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
(2×)
Furthermore, in determining whether this requirement has been satisfied, a court “may properly take into account affirmations which are founded in part upon the experience of specially trained agents.” United States v. Ashley, 876 F.2d 1069, 1072 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Landmesser, 553 F.2d 17, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriquez
(2×)
See also State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542 , 375 A.2d 1014 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S.Ct. 174 , 54 L.Ed.2d 126 (1977); Berryhill v. Ricketts, 242 Ga. 447, 448-49 , 249 S.E.2d 197, 199 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2418 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1979) (if a defendant gives a statement after being informed of the appointed attorney’s existence, the statements will be admissible because of the waiver); People v. Cozzi, 93 Ill.App.3d 94 , 48 Ill.Dec. 670 , 416 N.E.2d 1192 (1981) (when a defendant understands his rights and chooses to speak, not requesting his lawyer, such a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Derrico
(2×)
State v. Moscone, 171 Conn. 500, 510 , 370 A.2d 1030 (1976); State v. Darwin, 161 Conn. 413, 428 , 288 A.2d 422 (1971), citing Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see also State v. McLucas, 172 Conn. 542, 551 , 375 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 855 , 98 S. Ct. 174 , 54 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brooks
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
No. 77-15.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 71 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.