Mata v. Aaron, 434 U.S. 866 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Mata v. Aaron, 434 U.S. 866 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
150 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. William R. Metallo (ca11, 1990-10-05) · Strongest negative: United States v. Louis W. Stallings (ca10, 1987-02-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States v. Louis W. Stallings
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Olivas, 558 F.2d 1366, 1368 (10th Cir.) (conviction allowed to stand even though sentence was vacated), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 203 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William R. Metallo
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones, 554 F.2d 251, 252 (5th Cir.) 5 (under business-records exception, trial courts have “wide discretion in determining whether the document offered has the inherent probability of trustworthiness”), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Hahn v. State (2×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carter v. State (1977) 266 Ind. 196 , 361 N.E.2d 1208 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977); Brewer v. State (1969) 253 Ind. 154 , 252 N.E.2d 429 .
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,020 Richard Lessler v. Arthur D. Little
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 20 (1st Cir.) (rejecting an “unduly restrictive” interpretation of section 17(a) because “it would make the task of regulation impossible”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 966, 971, 98 S.Ct. 203 , 508, 523, 54 L.Ed.2d 143 , 453, 461 (1977).
cited Cited "see" United States v. James D. Baresh
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gramlich, 551 F.2d 1359, 1363 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 201 , 54 L.Ed.2d 141 (1977), United States v. Fischel, 686 F.2d 1082 (5th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy Maggitt
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Uptain, 552 F.2d 1107, 1108 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977). 10 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Joseph Muelbl
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 19 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 966, 971, 98 S.Ct. 203 , 508, 523, 54 L.Ed.2d 143 , 453, 461 (1977).
cited Cited "see" People v. Holowko
Ill. App. Ct. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones (5th Cir. 1977), 554 F.2d 251 , cert. denied (1977), 434 U.S. 866 , 54 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Armstead
La. · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Jones, 554 F.2d 251, 252 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 ; United States v. Verlin, 466 F.Supp. 155, 158 (N.D.Tex. 1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kaatz
10th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones, 5 Cir., 554 F.2d 251, 252 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Abrahams
D. Mass. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13 at 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 966, 971, 98 S.Ct. 203 , 508, 523, 54 L.Ed.2d 143 , 453, 461 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sweeney v. Mont. Third Judicial Dist. Court
Mont. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also , e.g. , United States v. Uptain , 552 F.2d 1108 , 1109 (5th Cir. 1977) (holding that counsel's "message to his client concerning the date of trial was not a privileged communication"), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977) ; In re Grand Jury Proc. , 568 F.2d at 557 (holding that "communications by a defense counsel to the client ... regarding the time and place of trial are not confidential and therefore are not protected by the attorney-client privilege"), cert denied , Black Horse v. United States , 435 U.S. 999 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) ; …
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rostoff
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 17 (1st Cir.), ___ ____ _____________ ______ cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rostoff (2×)
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 203 , 54 L.Ed.2d 143 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence Royalston
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Uptain, 552 F.2d 1107, 1108 (5th Cir.) (judges’ limiting instructions cured effects of extrinsic offense testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Curtis George Lockett
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Gramlich, 551 F.2d 1359 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 201 , 54 L.Ed.2d 141 (1977); United States v. Charest, supra; see United States v. Himmelwright, 551 F.2d 991 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 298 , 54 L.Ed.2d 189 (1977); United States v. Cobb, 432 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1970); c.f.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stinson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Carter v. State , 266 Ind. 140 , 361 N.E.2d 145 (1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 866 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pete Hernandez
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also the excellent discussion by Judge Feikens in United States v. Nichols, E.D.Mich.1975, 401 F.Supp. 1377 7 United States v. Olivas, 10 Cir. 1977, 558 F.2d 1366 , Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 203 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 8 United States v. Howard, 8 Cir. 1974, 507 F.2d 559 9 We do not deal here with the violation of separate statutes, the issue involved in Blockburger v. United States, 1932, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 and in Gore v. United States, 1958, 357 U.S. 386 , 78 S.Ct. 1280 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1405 , but with the interpretation of two phrases in one sentence of a single …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mata
v.
Aaron, Warden
No. 77-5087.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 866
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.