green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Doe
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292-93 , 97 S.Ct. 2290, 2298 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , reh'g denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); State v. Fletcher, 751 P.2d 822, 823-24 (Utah App. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. LeFevre
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292-93 , 97 S.Ct. 2290, 2298 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); State v. Fletcher, 751 P.2d 822, 823-24 (Utah App. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. State
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 293 , 97 S.Ct. 2290, 2298 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167, 171 , 46 S.Ct. 68, 69 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925).
cited
Cited "see"
Seaboard Sys. RR, Inc. v. Clemente
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , reh'g denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prater v. State
See Patterson v. State, 238 Ga. 204 ( 232 SE2d 233 ), cert. den., Patterson v. Georgia, 431 U. S. 970 , rehg. den., 434 U. S. 882 (1977); Brooks v. State, 141 Ga. App. 725 (5) ( 234 SE2d 541 ) (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
A.B. v. Frank
See Dob-bert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976), reh. denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. TPM
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292 , 97 S.Ct. 2290, 2297 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 344 , reh. den. 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 166 (1977); Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167, 169-170 , 46 S.Ct. 68 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. T.P.M.
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292 , 97 S.Ct. 2290, 2297 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , reh. den. 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167, 169-170 , 46 S.Ct. 68 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Duerr
See Dobbert v. Florida (1977), 432 U.S. 282 , rehearing denied (1977), 434 U.S. 882 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrison v. State
(2×)
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977), reh. den. 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 and 16A C.J.S.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 344 (1977), reh. den. 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 166 (1977), quoting the definition of an ex post facto law stated in Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167, 169 , 46 S.Ct. 68 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925), which is devoid of any allusion to reliance by the defendant upon the prior law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dycus, Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)
Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the offender. " * * * Youngblood, supra, at 42 , quoting Calder v. Bull (1798), 3 Dall. 386, 390 , 1 L.Ed. 648 (emphasis sic.). {¶ 19} Moreover, it is well-established that "no ex post facto violation occurs if the change in the law is merely procedural and does `not increase the punishment, nor change the ingredients of the offence or the ultimate facts necessary to establish guilt.'" Miller v. Florida (1987), 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garner v. Cherberg
See also Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 292 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , reh'g denied, 434 U.S. 882 (1977), where the United States Supreme Court held that changes in the Florida death penalty statute, made between the time of the murder and the trial, were procedural and on the whole ameliorative and hence there was no ex post facto violation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977), reh. denied, 434 U.S. 882 , 98 S.Ct. 246 , 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); Beazell v. Ohio, 269 U.S. 167 , 46 S.Ct. 68 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925); Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574 , 4 S.Ct. 202 , 28 L.Ed. 262 (1884).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dawkins
v.
Nabisco, Inc., Bakery & Confectionery Union, Local No. 42 Costey v. United States Dobbert v. Florida Fusco v. United States Falvo v. United States Keener v. Georgia Cahnmann v. Eckerty, City Clerk of Urbana Gholson v. Texas Pilla v. United States Harris v. Georgia Floyd v. Georgia Knighten v. Broderick Guelker v. Missouri Griffin v. Texas Employment Commission Allotey v. United States Patterson v. Georgia Johnston v. United States Crowley v. New Jersey Crowley v. New Jersey and Foster v. Bechtel Corp.
v.
Nabisco, Inc., Bakery & Confectionery Union, Local No. 42 Costey v. United States Dobbert v. Florida Fusco v. United States Falvo v. United States Keener v. Georgia Cahnmann v. Eckerty, City Clerk of Urbana Gholson v. Texas Pilla v. United States Harris v. Georgia Floyd v. Georgia Knighten v. Broderick Guelker v. Missouri Griffin v. Texas Employment Commission Allotey v. United States Patterson v. Georgia Johnston v. United States Crowley v. New Jersey Crowley v. New Jersey and Foster v. Bechtel Corp.
No. 76-1589; No. 76-1618; No. 76-5306; No. 76-6221; No. 76-6723; No. 76-6238; No. 76-6322; No. 76-6333; No. 76-6406; No. 76-6407; No. 76-6497; No. 76-6518; No. 76-6527; No. 76-6555; No. 76-6569; No. 76-6622; No. 76-6623; No. 76-6642; No. 76-6681; No. 76-6733.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar