green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Williams, Darryl Board, Anderson King, AKA Hasan Abdul-Malik, and Idris Cox, Najimah Abdul and Jerome Tolden, AKA Wadoud
See United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 784-85 (2d Cir.) (finding no abuse of discretion in court ruling that government could use earlier heroin conviction to impeach defendant even though defendant asserted that such ruling caused him to forego testifying in his own behalf), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 (1977). 24 14.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherman Harris, Johnny Lewis Holt, Ernest Wilcox, Jr., John Williams, Jr., Bernard Turner
(2×)
See United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karen L. Hinkle
(2×)
See United States v. Townsend, 555 F.2d 152, 156 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 184 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pablo Carreon
See United States v. Townsend, 555 F.2d 152 , 157 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Defillipo and James Defillipo
(4×)
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E); see United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 783-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977); Note, The United States Courts of Appeals: 1976-1977 Term Criminal Law and Procedure, 66 Geo.L.J. 201, 590-91 & n.2191 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde Hall
(2×)
See United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardy
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardy
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S. Ct. 277 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles J. Burkhart
(2×)
In McLernon this court, in discussing predisposition, quoted with approval from United States v. Kaminski, 703 F.2d 1004 (7th Cir.1983), to the effect that the factors relevant to determining predisposition include: 8 the character or reputation of the defendant, including any prior criminal record; whether the suggestion of the criminal activity was initially made by the Government; whether the defendant was engaged in the criminal activity for profit; whether the defendant evidenced reluctance to commit the offense, overcome only by repeated Government inducement or persuasion; and the natur…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Scott McLernon Kido Yaqui, Sherri Louise Farrell, Miguel Angel Carranza, and Marco Antonio Valdez-Cota
(4×)
Kaminski, 703 F.2d at 1008 (quoting Reynoso-Ulloa , 548 at 1336); See also United States v. Townsend, 555 F.2d 152 , 155 n. 3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 184 (1977).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond E. Kaminski
(4×)
While none of the factors alone indicates either the presence or absence of predisposition, the most important factor ... is whether the defendant evidenced reluctance to engage in criminal activity which was overcome by repeated Government inducement. 20 United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 F.2d 1329, 1336 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 2820 , 56 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978); see also United States v. Townsend, 555 F.2d 152 , 155 n. 3 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 184 ; United States v. Jannotti, supra, 501 F.Supp. at 1190-91, 1200 . 21 Bef…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plummer v. Chemical Bank
(2×)
See also, In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, supra, 607 F.2d 167 , where “settlement was achieved only after several years of pending litigation”, id. at 176 , and Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679 , (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d sub nom., Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977), where “the settlement was not negotiated in the early stages of the dispute, but rather after the parties had engaged in considerable litigation.” 424 F.Supp. at 688 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1169, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,321 Roderick Plummer, Raymond W. Armorer, Neville F. Caesar, Gwendolyn Moore, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chemical Bank, Miguel A. Oppenheimer, Louis Straker, Herman L. Clark, James Morrison, Theodore Ferguson and Herman I. Taitt, Objectors-Appellees
(2×)
See also, In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, supra, 607 F.2d 167 , where "settlement was achieved only after several years of pending litigation", id. at 176 , and Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679 , (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd sub nom., Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (1977), where "the settlement was not negotiated in the early stages of the dispute, but rather after the parties had engaged in considerable litigation." 424 F.Supp. at 688 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International Corporation
(2×)
In fact, to quote the majority opinion, "Had the parties to the contract wished to fashion such a bizarre provision, they certainly would have done so in a more explicit fashion." Ante at 950; see also at 953. 162 The few analogous cases, ante at 955-956, may support this view. 6 In Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 440 F.2d 1244 (7th Cir. 1970), which was purportedly followed by the district court in Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N. V., 424 F.Supp. 679, 688-90 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd mem. sub nom Brucker v. Indian Head, Inc., 559 F.2d 1202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boushee
(2×)
Compare United States v. Ortiz, 553 F.2d 782, 784 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed.2d 183 (a trial judge in his discretion was entitled to recognize that a narcotic trafficker lives a life of secrecy and dissembling and is prepared to say whatever is required by the demands of the moment, whether a truth or a lie) with United States v. Millings, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 293 , 535 F.2d 121 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rome et ux., Trustees
v.
Indian Head, Inc.
v.
Indian Head, Inc.
No. 77-185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1977.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.