green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sostre
(2×)
See State v. Rust, 197 Neb. 528, 537-38 , 250 N.W.2d 867 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S. Ct. 313 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Williams v. Harold W. Clarke
(2×)
See State v. Rust, 197 Neb. 528 , 250 N.W.2d 867, 874 (without distinguishing between the two phrases, aggravating circumstance (l)(d) “would include murders involving torture, sadism, sexual abuse”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S.Ct. 313 , 54 L.Ed.2d 198 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
Carey Dean Moore v. Harold W. Clarke, Carey Dean Moore v. Harold W. Clarke
(4×)
In these various cases, the Nebraska Supreme Court has held that "exceptional depravity" means: 17 (1) "so coldly calculated as to indicate a state of mind totally and senselessly bereft of regard for human life," State v. Harper, 208 Neb. 568, 579 , 304 N.W.2d 663, 668 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 882 [ 102 S.Ct. 368 , 70 L.Ed.2d 194 (1981); State v. Rust, 197 Neb. 528, 539 , 250 N.W.2d 867, 874 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 [ 98 S.Ct. 313 , 54 L.Ed.2d 198 ] (1977); accord State v. Holtan, 197 Neb. 544, 547 , 250 N.W.2d 876, 880 (1977), cert. denied sub nom. 434 U.S. 912 [ 98 S.Ct. 313…
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Dean Holtan v. Charles Black, as Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, Richard Dean Holtan v. Charles Black, as Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex
(2×)
See State v. Holtan, 197 Neb. 544 , 250 N.W.2d 876 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S.Ct. 313 , 54 L.Ed.2d 198 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holtan v. Black
(2×)
See State v. Holtan, 197 Neb. 544 , 250 N.W.2d 876 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S.Ct. 313 , 54 L.Ed.2d 198 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Burke
(2×)
If there is no such evidence, it would be improper for the court to instruct the jury on this subsection. *158 . . . [W]e believe that the “previously convicted” language used by the legislature in subsection (e)(3) refers to “criminal activity conducted, prior to the events out of which the charge of murder arose.” State v. Stewart, 197 Neb. 497 , 250 N.W.2d 849 (1977); see also, State v. Rust, [ 197 Neb. 528 , 250 N.W.2d 867 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S. Ct. 313 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Laws
(2×)
See also State v. Holtan, 197 Neb. 544 , 250 N.W.2d 876 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 912 , 98 S.Ct. 313 , 54 L.Ed.2d 198 (1977), where language in the Nebraska capital murder statute very similar to that discussed in Arnold was held to be constitutionally valid, and concurring opinion of Higgins, J., in Stokes . 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tracy
v.
Golston
v.
Golston
No. 77-348.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1977.
Published
Certiorari before judgment to C. A. 9th Cir. and other relief denied.