green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jack Randall MacCloskey
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
solicitation of another to commit a felony is a crime in north carolina, even though the solicitation is of no effect and the crime solicited is never committed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wolcott
See State v. Furr, 292 N.C. 711, 720 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 (1977) (because “[t]he gravamen of the offense of soliciting lies in counseling, enticing or inducing another to commit a crime,” it was of no consequence that the person solicited was only solicited to find a killer); Moss v. State, 888 P.2d 509, 517-518 (Okla.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Granite Broadcasting Corp.
See In re Oneida Ltd., 351 B.R. at 92 , citing Person v. Assoc. of Bar of City of N.Y., 554 F.2d 534, 538 (2d Cir.1977), cert denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977); Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell, 704 *143 F.Supp. 392, 401 (S.D.N.Y.1989), rev’d on other grounds, 922 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Oneida Ltd.
See Person v. Assoc. of Bar of City of N.Y., 554 F.2d 534, 538 (2d Cir.1977), cert denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977); Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell, 704 F.Supp. 392, 401 (S.D.N.Y.1989), rev’d on other grounds, 922 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1990). 20 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. Sheatsley
See Ealy, supra. As maintained by the Second Circuit in Person v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 554 F.2d 534 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977), a legislature rationally may conclude that contingent fees for experts enhance the likelihood that they will embellish their testimony in order to be paid or that the contingent nature of a fee might even induce perjury.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Yee
See State v. Furr, 235 S.E.2d 193 (N.C. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 and Meyer v. State, 425 A.2d 664 (Md.
cited
Cited "see"
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
See Person v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 554 F.2d 534, 536, 538 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank C. Parrino, United States of America v. Matthew Trupiano
See United States v. Bennett, 563 F.2d 879, 881 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977); United States v. Bohn, 508 F.2d 1145, 1149 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1676 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); see also United States v. Jenkins, 649 F.2d 273, 275 (4th Cir.1981) (“In our view a lay-off man is not a bettor, but a bet receiver who takes the place of the bookmaker insofar as that particular bet is concerned.”); United States v. Morris, 612 F.2d 483, 493 (10th Cir.1979) (“[I]t is not necessary that lay-off betting be a two-way street in …
discussed
Cited "see"
Frye v. State
See State v. Furr, 292 N.C. 711 , 235 S.E.2d 193, 202 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 402 , 54 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977): “We recognize that ... a single solicitation may continue over a period of time and involve several contacts where the solicitee gives no definite refusal to the solicitor’s request.
cited
Cited "see"
Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co.
See Person v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 554 F.2d 534, 536 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., Inc., Rocco Barone, Bill Carafello, Adolph Nazarro, Sr., Adolph Nazarro, Jr., Joseph Nazarro, Dick Knight, David Lavorgna and Morris Wax, Standard Dye & Finishing Co., Inc., Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co., a Division of Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers International Union of America, Afl-Cio and Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund, Defendants
See Person v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, 554 F.2d 534, 536 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
See, e.g., Bonime v. Doyle, 416 F.Supp. 1372, 1387 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 401 , 54 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John William Hammond, A/K/A \Big John\""
See also United States v. Morris, 612 F.2d 483 (10th Cir.1979) (person who allowed principals in a bookmaking operation to use her apartment and who received telephone messages for the principals was not a conductor of the business since her actions were merely helpful to the operation of the enterprise). 7 The Tenth Circuit's approach has not been adopted in the clear majority of the circuits. 4 In United States v. Bennett, 563 F.2d 879 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977), in approval of the majority position, this court stated that section 1955 inclu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Balistrieri
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bennett, 563 F.2d 879, 882 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 403 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 (1977); United States v. Clements, 588 F.2d 1030, 1040 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tidwell v. State
See also Tarkington v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Port Arthur, 516 S.W.2d 722, 724-725 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1974, writ ref’d n.r.e.), and United States v. Martinez, 555 F.2d 1248, 1249-50 (U.S.Ct. of App., 5th Cir.1977, certiorari denied 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 404 , 54 L.Ed.2d 282 , rehearing denied 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 754 , 54 L.Ed. 774 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meyer v. State
Compare State v. Furr, 235 S.E.2d 193 (N.C. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , in which the issue was mentioned but not decided, and see also Regina v. Most, 7 Q.B.D. 244 (1881), involving a converse situation — a solicitation placed in a newspaper (i.e., a solicitation of many people to perform one act).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sloan
v.
Bonime
v.
Bonime
No. 77-374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.