green
Positive treatment
10.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Andrew Bias v. R. Michael Cody and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See Bias v. State, 561 P.2d 523 (Okla.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Austin
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S. Ct. 432 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gurwara v. Lyphomed, Inc.
See, Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1027-1028 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (purported *1167 ly deceptive practices occurred in a struggle for control of the corporation).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,472 Frank A. Beard and Edith F. Beard v. J.I. Case Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Tenneco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 553 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (declining to give deference to district court’s interpretation of foreign law).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Judd Carver Eisenberg
See, United States v. Lewis, 759 F.2d 1316 (quoting United States v. Stolle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1117 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (in demonstrating the existence of a conspiracy, the government must only demonstrate a likelihood of an illicit association between the declarant and the defendant).
cited
Cited "see"
Virginia Agricultural Growers Association, Inc., and Virginia Carolina Agricultural Producers Association, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Sherman Paulk and Deborah Paulk, Virginia Agricultural Growers Association, Inc., and Virginia Carolina Agricultural Producers Association, Inc. Frederick County Fruit Growers Association Washington County Gruit Growers Association Valley Growers Cooperative, Inc. Mid-Hudson Growers Cooperative, Inc. Northwest Growers Cooperative, Inc. Niagara Orchards K & W Farms Gunnison Lakeshore Orchards Forrence Orchards, Inc. Northern Orchard Co., Inc. Sullivan Orchards Orchardale Fruit Farm Al Gioia & Sons Lamont Fruit Farm, Lake Ontario Fruit Sales, Inc., Apple Acres v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor, and Sherman Paulk and Deborah Paulk, and Cedrick Turner Vincent Clark Gene R. Reeder
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1124 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bowman
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B); see United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1119-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Bowman A/K/A Ronald Roy Cooper A/K/A Harvey James Somack A/K/A J.D.S. A/K/A Dwain Raymond Schuch A/K/A James Emerson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B); see United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1119-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose A. Garcia, United States of America v. Thomas W. Barker, United States of America v. Dana G. Stephenson, United States of America v. Thomas Lawrence, United States of America v. Roberto Trelles
"Once the existence of a conspiracy has been established, even slight evidence connecting a particular defendant to the conspiracy may constitute proof of the defendant's involvement in the scheme to render him culpable." United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906, 912 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 516 , 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977); see United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1118 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1052-53 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 (1977)…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
“Once the existence of a conspiracy has been established, even slight evidence connecting a particular defendant to the conspiracy may constitute proof of the defendant’s involvement in the scheme to render him culpable.” United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906, 912 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 516 , 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977); see United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1118 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1052-53 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1025 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977). 5 The purpose underlying section 10(b) and the rules adopted under it is to insure that investors obtain disclosure of material facts in connection with their investment decisions regarding the purchase or sale of securities.
discussed
Cited "see"
Laura Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1025 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977). 5 The purpose underlying section 10(b) and the rules adopted under it is to insure that investors obtain disclosure of material facts in connection with their investment decisions regarding the purchase or sale of securities.
cited
Cited "see"
Joan G. HEAD, Appellant, v. Howard HEAD, Appellee
Accord Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.) ("Irrespective of the deference to which a district court judge’s determination of the local law is entitled, we regard the matter of foreign country law as purely a 'question of law,’ as it is characterized in Rule 44.1, the resolution of which we are free to arrive at on the basis of our own independent research and analysis.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,098 Pete J. Buffo v. Charles A. Graddick, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Respondent
See Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1025-30 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis W. Wegerer and Judith A. Wegerer v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston
(2×)
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,643 Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Security Pacific National Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Accord, Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 , 1027 (3 Cir.1977) (Adams, J.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Accord, Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 ,1027 (3 Cir.1977) (Adams, J.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
NATOWITZ ON BEHALF OF LEXINGTON/56TH v. Mehlman
See Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1027 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); Note, The Controlling Influence Standard in Rule 10b-5 Corporate Mismanagement Cases, 86 Harv.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie Joseph Bruscino and Charles Eugene Kell
(2×)
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1118 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cedar Rapids v. Cach
See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (proof of foreign law); Burnett v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 368 F.Supp. 1152, 1155-56 (D.C.N.M. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Elmer Luschen, United States of America v. Wayne Bernard King
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael J. Barbieri, United States of America v. Wayne Elliott
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kadota v. Hosogai
See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan G. Rios
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1121-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Markakis v. SS VOLENDAM
See Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 553-56 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); Ramsay v. Boeing Co., 432 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1970); DeWindt v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 166 Civ. 1973 (D.V.I.
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Valley
See Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1120 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Orozco, United States of America v. Jose Liva-Corona
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1124 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); United States v. DeGeorgia, 420 F.2d 889 , 893 & n.11 (9th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee A. Lanier
See United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perez
Graham, Handbook of Federal Evidence § 608.4, at 453 (2nd ed. 1986); see also United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1122-23 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (testimony of DEA agent that Government witness had provided DEA with reliable information elicited to rehabilitate Government witness was a technical violation of Fed.R.Evid. 608(b)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perez
Graham, Handbook of Federal Evidence Sec. 608.4, at 453 (2nd ed. 1986); see also United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1122-23 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977) (testimony of DEA agent that Government witness had provided DEA with reliable information elicited to rehabilitate Government witness was a technical violation of Fed.R.Evid. 608(b)). 18 We fail to see how Goitisolo's refusal of the $5,000 bribe could possibly bolster his credibility even had it been admissible evidence.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.
See Mobile Marine Sales, Ltd., 776 F.2d at 89 ; see also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.
See Mobile Marine Sales, Ltd., 776 F.2d at 89 ; see also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruth v. American Airlines
Fust v. Arnar-Stone Laboratories, 736 F.2d 1098 , 1100 (5th Cir.1984) ("Statutes of limitation, being procedural and remedial in nature, are generally accorded retroactive effect, unless they are unconstitutionally cast."); see also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 553 (7th Cir.1977), certiorari denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 ; FDIC v. Petersen, 770 F.2d 141, 142 (10th Cir.1985). 33 In Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman, 486 U.S. 717 , 108 S.Ct. 2117 , 100 L.Ed.2d 743 (1988), the Supreme Court concluded that there was no constitutional problem with a state applying its own statute of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banas v. American Airlines
Fust v. Arnar-Stone Laboratories, 736 F.2d 1098 , 1100 (5th Cir.1984) (“Statutes of limitation, being procedural and remedial in nature, are generally accorded retroactive effect, unless they are unconstitutionally cast.”); see also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 553 (7th Cir.1977), certiorari denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 ; FDIC v. Petersen, 770 F.2d 141, 142 (10th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whiteaker v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Wallace v. Havener, 552 F.2d 721, 724 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 433 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See, e.g., Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1025-29 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.
See, e.g., Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022, 1025-29 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Paul
See also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 553 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); Bournias v. Atlantic Maritime Co., 220 F.2d 152, 154-55 (2nd Cir.1955); see Stokke v. Southern Pacific Co., 169 F.2d 42, 43 (10th Cir.1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry Jon Martin, United States of America v. John David Emerson
See Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2780 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987); see also United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109, 1117 (8th Cir.) (“The independent evidence of illicit association may be completely circumstantial, or may consist of the conspirators’ own conduct and admissions”), cer t. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See e.g., Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Shamrock Associates v. Moraga Corp., 557 F.Supp. 198, 204 (D.Del.1983); see also Brown, 661 F.2d at 65 (discussing Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See e.g., Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004 , 97 S.Ct. 538 , 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976); Shamrock Associates v. Moraga Corp., 557 F.Supp. 198, 204 (D.Del.1983); see also Brown, 661 F.2d at 65 (discussing Ketchum v. Green, 557 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 431 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Department of Revenue
(See Smith v. Toman (1938), 368 Ill. 414, 420 .) They “are procedural in nature (see Orlicki v. McCarthy (1954), 4 Ill. 2d 342 ; Hilberg v. Industrial Com. (1942), 380 Ill. 102 ; see also Kalmich v. Bruno (7th Cir. 1977), 553 F.2d 549 , cert. denied (1977), 434 U.S. 940 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Manbeck, United States of America v. Kenneth Herring, United States of America v. Mark Huiet Sale, United States of America v. Lorenz Josephus Proden, United States of America v. Kermit Theodore Brogden, United States of America v. John Wesley Flannel, United States of America v. Gary Gallopo, United States of America v. John Benjamin Barton, Jr., Jessie Lee Mallory, and Arthur Duncan, United States of America v. John O'hare, Eddie Brantley, Thomas Earnest Folske, Thomas Sams Hightower, Timothy Allen Laxton, Harrell Lewis, Jr., and John Isidore Stevens, United States of America v. Aaron Douglas Staetter, John Michael Iyoob, James Anthony Hastings, and Gregory Michael Scott, United States of America v. David Martin Summerville
See, e.g., United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manbeck
See, e.g., United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McLINN v. FJORD
See also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); 9 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Churchill v. The F/V Fjord
See also Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549, 552 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1977); 9 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellender v. Schweiker
See, e.g., Kalmich v. Bruno, 553 F.2d 549 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 940 , 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 (1970); Lahr v. Adell Chemical Co., 300 F.2d 256 (1st Cir.1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Braswell
See also United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 940 [ 98 S.Ct. 432 , 54 L.Ed.2d 300 ] (1977), (sometimes specific instances of conduct may be used to show an absence of bias); United States v. Lechoco, 542 F.2d 84 (D.C.Cir.1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berry, Judges
v.
Judiciary Commission of Louisiana
v.
Judiciary Commission of Louisiana
No. 77-423.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1977.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.