green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
American Samoa Government v. Su'a
See United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir. 1977) (per curiam) (upholding verdict that jury reached after "brief deliberation”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S. Ct. 438 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California
See Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 558 F.2d 150, 159 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977) (finding waiver where state did not assert immunity until almost a year after its time to appeal order had expired); but see In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litig., 956 F.2d 282, 286 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1992) (noting that federal courts have applied a tough standard for finding an implied waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity, and holding that New Mexico’s intervention in suit in order to claim a portion of funds for its citizens did not waive its immu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Commonwealth
See aiso Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 426 F.Supp. 1297 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd 558 F.2d 150 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977). 3 It scarceiy need be reiterated here that the relief from a decision of this court in a federal Case can be obtained only from the United States Supreme Court and not from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
cited
Cited "see"
New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey
See Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 558 F.2d 150, 158 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See United States v. Anderson, 561 F. (2d) 1301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 943 , 98 S. Ct. 438 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Collins
See Cape Publications, Inc. v. Adams, 336 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), cert. den. 348 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 440 , 54 L.Ed.2d 305 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corp. v. Fraternal Ass'n of Steel Haulers
See Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 558 F.2d 150 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahern v. Scholz
Peñagarícano-Soler, 911 F.2d at 846 ; see also United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir.) (holding that jury’s brief deliberation does *786 not indicate it did not give full and impartial consideration to the evidence), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); Brotherton, 427 F.2d at 1289 (finding that jury deliberation of five to seven minutes did not demonstrate that jury did not consider court’s instructions before reaching verdict).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahern v. Scholz
Pe agar cano-Soler, 911 F.2d at 846 ; see also __________________ ________ United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir.) ______________ ________ (holding that jury's brief deliberation does not indicate it did not give full and impartial consideration to the evidence), cert. _____ denied, 434 U.S. 943 (1977); Brotherton, 427 F.2d at 1289 ______ __________ (finding that jury deliberation of five to seven minutes did not demonstrate that jury did not consider court's instructions before reaching verdict).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler
See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) ("brief deliberation”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); United States v. Brotherton, 427 F.2d 1286, 1289 (8th Cir.1970) (five to seven minutes); Wall v. United States, 384 F.2d 758, 762 (10th Cir.1967) (one hour); Kimes v. United States, 242 F.2d 99, 100-01 (5th Cir.) (twenty minutes) (order denying rehearing), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1429 (1957). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, American Lung Association of Philadelphia, and Montgomery County, Delchester Lung Association, Sierra Club, Pennsylvania Chapter Friends of the Earth of the Delaware Valley, Citizens' Committee for Environmental Control, Quinn, Kevin, Farrell, Kaysi, Weiss, Ruth G. Klinkner, John, Biez, Elizabeth S., Shulman, Mona v. Commonwealth of Pa., & Train, Russell, E., Ind. & as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Sherlock, William T., Individually and as Secretary of the Pa Dept. Of Transportation, Goddard, Maurice K., Individually and as Secretary of the Pa Dept. Of Environmental Resources, Snyder, Daniel J., Iii, Individually and as Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region Iii. United States of America v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and William T. Sherlock, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources and Maurice K. Goddard, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. Appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
See also Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 426 F.Supp. 1297 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd 558 F.2d 150 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977). 3 It scarcely need be reiterated here that the relief from a decision of this court in a federal case can be obtained only from the United States Supreme Court and not from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. 15 Unsuccessful in the district court and this court, and rebuffed by the United States Supreme Court, members of the Pennsylvania legislature, as private litigants, attempted a collateral attack on the several final judgments of the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daubert v. Percy
Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 ; see also Vecchione v. Wohlgemuth, 558 F.2d 150 (3d Cir.1977), certiorari denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 ; Rodríguez v. Swank, 496 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 151 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. Board of Education, New Jersey
See also System Federation No. 91 v. Wright, supra, 364 U.S. at 647 — 48, 81 S.Ct. at 371 (“[a] balance must thus be struck between the policies of res judicata and the right of the court to apply modified measures to changed circumstances”). 27 Lastly, nor may the Board rely on subsection (6) of Rule 60(b) (“any other reason justifying relief”), which “provides for extraordinary relief and may only be invoked upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.” Vecchione v. Wohlegemuth, 558 F.2d 150 , 159 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 439 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977), quo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-5531.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1977.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.