green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. Port Terminal RR Ass'n
(2×)
See Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. v. Wherry, 548 S.W.2d 743, 748 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 497 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Romero v. Lone Star Co.
(2×)
See Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. Wherry, 548 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.Civ.App. — Houston [1st Dist] 1976 writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 497 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977) (employee may bring action against an employer for libel and slander).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolling v. Baker
(2×)
It may be inferred from the relation of the parties, the circumstances attending the publication, the language used, and from the words or acts of the defendant before, at, or after the time of the communication; but there must be evidence from which the jury can infer malice existing at the time of publication and actuating it. 36 TEX.JUR.2d 475, Libel and Slander § 149; see Houston Belt and Terminal Railway Co. v. Wherry, 548 S.W.2d 743, 754 (Tex.Civ.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 497 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ishtyaq v. Nelson
See Pierre v. United States, [ 547 F.2d 1281, 1289 (5th Cir.) (en banc), vacated and remanded to consider mootness, 434 U.S. 962 [ 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 ] (1977)].” 684 F.2d at 212 .
cited
Cited "see"
Neitzel v. State
See People v. Jones, 193 Colo. 250 , 565 P.2d 1333 , appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Louis v. Nelson
See Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281, 1283 (5th Cir. 1977), vacated and remanded, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haitian Refugee Center v. Smith
See Coriolan v. INS, 559 F.2d 993, 996 (5th Cir. 1977). 9 The district court found that the influx of Haitians deported from the Bahamas did not contribute to the backlog of deportation cases since that influx involved excludable and not deportable Haitians. 503 F.Supp. at 511 n.91 10 See, e.g., Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977); Sannon v. United States, 427 F.Supp. 1270 (S.D.Fla.1977), vacated and remanded without opinion, 566 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1978) 11 It is highly likely that INS' inaction provided t…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Marcy
See the opinion of the majority, supra, n. 6. [2] It may be argued that the facts as set forth in this court's opinion in People v. Jones, 193 Colo. 250 , 565 P.2d 1333 (1977), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977), do not clearly show circumstances that would support the jury's verdict.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanchez v. Kindt
See also Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281, 1283, 1289-90 (5th Cir.) (entry doctrine fiction applied to aliens seeking parole pending decision on petition for asylum), vacated and remanded to consider mootness, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977); Ahrens v. Rojas, 292 F.2d at 408-11 (entry doctrine bars excludable alien from claiming fifth amendment rights to a hearing on the revocation of his parole).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Bertrand v. Charles Sava, Laissez-Moi Vigile v. Charles Sava
Fiallo v. Bell, supra; see also Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281, 1290 (5th Cir. 1977) (en banc), vacated and remanded to consider mootness, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Haitian Refugee Center v. Smith
See, e.g., Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.ct. 498, 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977); Sannon v. United States, 427 F.Supp. 1270 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vigile v. Sava
Habeas petitions in these cases were denied as “without merit.” Petition of Cahill, supra at 1344; see also Pierre v. United States, 547 F.2d 1281, 1290 (5th Cir.), vacated 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977), vacated and remanded, 570 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Taggart
See, e. g., People v. Jones, 193 Colo. 250 , 565 P.2d 1333 (1977), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 498 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977); People v. Saghy, 190 Colo. 79 , 543 P.2d 1243 (1975); People v. Gallegos, 181 Colo. 264 , 509 P.2d 596 (1973); Crim.P. 52(b).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.
(2×)
See also Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. v. Wherry, 548 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.Civ.App.1976), appeal dismissed 434 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 497 , 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co.
v.
Wherry
v.
Wherry
No. 77-419.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1977.
Published
Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 1st Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.