green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[p]ossession of a firearm demonstrates the likelihood that a defendant took steps to prevent contraband or money from being stolen.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Ultimate consummation of the scheme is not essential to completing the crime of conspiracy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. $77,246.00 in United States Currency
possession of a firearm demonstrates the likelihood that a defendant took steps to prevent contraband or money from being stolen.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. $22,991.00, More or Less, in United States Currency
ossession of a firearm demonstrates the likelihood that a defendant took steps to prevent contraband or money from being stolen.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Nobuo Kiriki
ultimate consummation of the scheme is not essential to completing the crime of conspiracy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Louis Werner
the defendant must make a 'strong showing of prejudice' in order to support a claim of prejudicial joinder.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reshat Shabani, A/K/A Lee Shabani
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977) (government need not prove defendant knew of all purposes and all participants in conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Meredith
See United States v Kearney, 560 F2d 1358, 1362 (CA 9, 1977), cert den 434 US 971 (1977), where, on the facts of that case, the court held: The government proved that each defendant knew, or had reason to know, that others were involved in a broad project for the illegal transportation and distribution of narcotics, and that his benefits were probably dependent upon the success of the entire operation. ...
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Leonard
(2×)
See State v. Folkes, 565 P.2d 1125, 1127 (Utah), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977); Holmes, 774 P.2d at 508 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert S. Palow, United States of America v. Paul C. Alvarado
See United States v. Muller, 550 F.2d 1375, 1379 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry Reservitz
See, United States v. Bautista, supra, citing, United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 21 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
(2×)
It has been flatly rejected by the Fifth Circuit, United States v. Pearson, 655 F.2d 569, 570 (5th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023, 1032-34 (5th Cir.1979)); see United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528, 534 (5th Cir.1979) (appropriate test looks "not to the evidence adduced at trial but focuse[s] on the elements of the offense charged"), and the Ninth Circuit, United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 , 1381 n. 14 (9th Cir.1980) (citing United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977)), …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
Accord United States v. Kopel, 552 F.2d 1265, 1272 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 970 , 98 S.Ct. 520 , 54 L.Ed.2d 459 (1977); United States v. Johnson, 478 F.2d 1129, 1131 (5th Cir.1973). 78 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hively
See United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 21 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977) (not error to exclude cross-examination into witness’ grant of immunity with regard to another securities fraud prosecution when defendants had objected to this evidence on direct, on theory that evidence would be prejudicial to defendants since witness had been involved with them in securities firm).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis M. MAYO, Jr., and James Harold Dondich, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1368 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977). 1 XI INSTRUCTION ON PROOF OF INTENT Appellants object to the trial court’s giving of the following instruction on proof of intent: Intent ordinarily may not be proven directly, because there is no way of fathoming or scrutinizing the operations of the human mind.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Finazzo
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358 (CA9 1977) cert. den., 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977); United States v. Solano, 605 F.2d 1141 (CA9 1979) cert. den., 444 U.S. 1020 , 100 S.Ct. 677 , 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980); United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (CA9 1980); United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023 (CA5 1979); United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528 (CA5 1979); United States v. Rodriquez, 612 F.2d 906 (CA5 1980); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (CA5 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
See United States v. Carvin, 555 F.2d 1303, 1305 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 99 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1978), and United States v. Haley, 581 F.2d 723, 726 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 681 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Patmon
See United States v. Davis, 557 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 971 (1977); and United States v. Gusan, 549 F.2d 15 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 430 U.S. 985 (1977), which revealed extensive investigation by the police.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arden Lee Smith AKA Alfredo Lama, United States of America v. Leroy Jones, United States of America v. John Doe Curley, AKA Ernest Crayton
(2×)
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362-63 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362-63 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. McDonough
See United States v. Kopel, 552 F.2d 1265, 1274 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 970 , 98 S.Ct. 520 , 54 L.Ed.2d 459 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Friedman, United States of America v. Robert John McCoy United States of America v. Douglas Robert Johnson, United States of America v. Robert Francis Garrity
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedman
See United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Massey
(2×)
See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), United States v. Davis, 557 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Clyde Lincoln
See United States v. Garvin, 555 F.2d 1303, 1305 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977); United States v. Prochaska, 222 F.2d 1, 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 836 , 76 S.Ct. 73 , 100 L.Ed. 746 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maneti
The court noted the absence of usual outward signs of multiple residency, including “separate entrances, doorbells, mailboxes, name plates, apartment numbers, or ‘room for rent’ signs.” Id.; see also United States v. Davis, 557 F.2d 1239, 1248 (8th Cir.) (warrant upheld where the “house appeared to be a single family dwelling place, not an apartment building”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977); Houser v. Geary, 465 F.2d 193, 195 (9th Cir.1972) (warrant validly issued where premises appeared to be a two story single family residence with appurtenance…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland v. Garrison
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Davis, 557 F. 2d 1239, 1247-1248 (CA8), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 971 (1977); 2 W.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jean Hannah v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company
See, e.g., United States v. Kearny, 560 F.2d 1358, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 971 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Weaver
See, e.g., United States v. Davis, 557 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir.), cert. denied *382 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977); United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 749 , 5 L.Ed.2d 744 (1961); 11 A.L.R.3d 1330 , 1344 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan G. Rios
See also United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-5286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1977.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.