green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Steven Wayne Tyler
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But see United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 455 (1st Cir.) (upholding the assessment of fees for court-appointed counsel under section 3651 as a “fine”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 455 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977) (such a condition "might be thought to bear a reasonable relationship to the treatment of the accused and the protection of the public.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); United States v. Gurtunca, 836 F.2d 283, 287 (7th Cir.1987) (sentencing judge has an exceptional degree of flexibility in determining probation conditions); United States v. Allen, 596 F.2d 227 , 232 & n. 6 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 149 , 62 L.Ed.2d 97 (1979) (s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Peoples v. Warfield & Sanford, Inc.
See Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698, 711 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 3266 , 97 L.Ed.2d 764 (1987) (citing Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
(2×)
See United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 454 (1st Cir.1977) (failure to name a person for whom probable cause existed does not require suppression where application provided sufficient information to enable issuing judge to determine the statutory preconditions were satisfied), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1988
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 75-78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977); Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas and Oil Co., 331 F.Supp. 92, 108-12 (C.D.Cal.1971), aff'd, 461 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 950 , 93 S.Ct. 272 , 34 L.Ed.2d 221 (1972). 23 Even if we were to consider the claim, there are due process problems in depriving the Generals--who are not parties in this action--of property without affording them notice and the opportunity to defend their interests in court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bandes v. Harlow & Jones, Inc.
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 75-78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977); Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas and Oil Co., 331 F.Supp. 92, 108-12 (C.D.Cal.1971), aff 'd, 461 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir.1972) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 950 , 93 S.Ct. 272 , 34 L.Ed.2d 221 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Bonded Warehouse Corp. v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 77-78 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977); Rios v. Marshall, 530 F.Supp. 351 , 372 n. 22 (S.D.N.Y.1981); International Ass’n. of Machinists v. O.P.E.C., 477 F.Supp. 553 , 570 n. 17 (1979), aff'd, 649 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir.1981). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Allied Bank International v. Banco Credito Agricola De Cartago
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, *1444 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 80 (2d Cir. 1977) (Van Graafeiland, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977); Linseman v. World Hockey Ass'n, 439 F.Supp. 1315, 1324 (D.Conn.1977). 38 .W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrial Investment Development Corporation v. Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
(2×)
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1976), Rev'd on other grounds, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977). 27 The authority asserted to support Mitsui's position is Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977), and Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co., 331 F.Supp. 92 (C.D.Cal.1971), Aff'd, 461 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Harrison Barham, A/K/A Robert Myers
See generally United States v. Scott, 5 Cir., 1977, 555 F.2d 522, 526-27 , cert. denied, 1977, 434 U.S. 985 , 98 S.Ct. 610 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 . 22 As for Barham’s second contention, we find that if any of the alleged misrepresentations were in fact misrepresentations, they were not material nor were they intentional or reckless within the meaning of Franks v. Delaware, 1978, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 . 23 Summation We therefore reject Barham’s argument that the search warrant was constitutionally invalid.
cited
Cited "see"
Jack's Cookie Company v. The United States of America
See Koerner v. United States, 550 F.2d 1362 (4 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Industrial Investment Development Corp. v. Mitsui & Co.
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1976), rev’d on other grounds, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clements
See United States v. Scott, 555 F.2d 522, 526 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 985 , 98 S.Ct. 610 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clements
See United States v. Scott, 555 F.2d 522, 526 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 985 , 98 S.Ct. 610 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William F. Gerardi
(2×)
Our role on review of the sufficiency of a wiretap application is a limited one; it is “not to make a de novo determination of sufficiency . but to decide if the facts set forth in the application were minimally adequate to support the determination that was made.” United States v. Scibelli, 549 F.2d 222, 226 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 2687 , 53 L.Ed.2d 278 (1977); see United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 452 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Erdwein v. United States
Accord, Koontz v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 762 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Building Industry Fund v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Rule 54(b) certification may be appropriate “where an expensive and duplicative trial could be avoided if, without delaying prosecution of the surviving claims, a dismissed claim were reversed in time to be tried with other claims.” Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698, 711 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 3266 , 97 L.Ed.2d 764 (1987); see also Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir.) (affirming grant of Rule 54(b) certification where district judge made specific findings that second trial could pose additional expense to parties and that appeal would not delay tri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Risk v. Kingdom of Norway
See, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 75-78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977) (refusing to hear suit by independent oil producer against the major oil producers *1168 because it would require inquiry into Libya’s motivation for nationalizing the plaintiff’s assets); Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co., 331 F.Supp. 92, 103-04 (C.D.Cal.1971) (dismissal of action which would require decision on boundary dispute between two foreign sovereigns), aff'd per curiam, 461 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 950 , 93 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cullen v. Margiotta
See, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977). 51 Since the appellate court may review the Rule 54(b) certification for abuse of discretion, it does not suffice for the district court to announce its determination that "there is no just cause for delay" in conclusory form.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cullen v. Margiotta
See, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
World Arrow Tourism Enterprises, Ltd. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
The Court recognizes the well established rule that “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957) (footnote omitted); see also Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10, 14 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977) (denying motion to dismiss cláims one and two of plaintiffs’ complaint; dismissing the third claim on the act of state doctrine); 410 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (denying motion for certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) as to Court’s refusal to dismiss claims one and two); 444 F.Supp. 68 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (denying defendants’ motion to vacate stay of arbitration as to the fourth claim and to stay judicial proceedings on claim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hicks v. United States
(2×)
Compare McCray, supra, 386 U.S. at 313 , 87 S.Ct. at 1063 (when arresting officers testified under oath, in open court, subject to cross-examination regarding informer’s statements and reliability, and trial court was satisfied with their veracity, court properly exercised its discretion to respect informer’s privilege) and United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 453 (1st Cir.) (when trial court had no reason based on agent’s testimony or affidavits to question reliability of informants, in camera identification of informants not necessary), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lyons
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Santarpio, 560 F.2d 448, 453 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 609 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977); United States v. Webster, 473 F.Supp. 586, 591 (D.Md.1979), aff’d 639 F.2d 174 (4th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.
National American Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 448 F.Supp. at 640 ; see, e. g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977) (foreclosing antitrust conspiracy suit against private oil companies that would have required inquiry into alleged untoward motives behind Libya’s nationalization of its oil industry).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
See, e. g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Applied Digital Technology, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation
See, e. g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10, 25-26 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 984 , 98 S.Ct. 608 , 54 L.Ed.2d 477 (1977).
California
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1977.
Cited by 68 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.