green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
“the judge must blend "an appreciation of the inevitable difficulties of trial administration with a concern for constitutional protections”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Johnson
the judge must blend "an appreciation of the inevitable difficulties of trial administration with a concern for constitutional protections
cited
Cited "see"
Wladyslaw Felzcerek v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 , 314 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramirez
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); United States v. Price, 599 F.2d 494 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Phillips
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); United States v. Obayagbo-na, 627 F.Supp. 329 (E.D.N.Y.1985); State v. Flesher, 286 N.W.2d 215 (Iowa 1979); Common wealth v. Coleman, 458 Pa. 112 , 326 A.2d 387 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Chavis
See Dunne, supra, quoting United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83, 86 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 (1977) (trial judge “must blend ‘an appreciation of the inevitable difficulties of trial administration with a concern for constitutional protections’ ”). *712 In the present case, the judge was within his discretion in concluding that the interests of the courts and the public in efficient trial administration were not outweighed by a showing of good cause to support the defendant’s motion — such as a conflict of interest, incompetence of counsel, or an irreconcilable breakdo…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); United States v. Iaconetti, 540 F.2d 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976); Robinson v. Shapiro, 646 F.2d 734 (2d Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gotti
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309, 314-16 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John W. Sliker, John Carbone, and Theodore Buchwald, A/K/A \Bucky
Moreover, the evidence was “not necessarily prejudicial in any sense that matters to the rules of evidence,” United States v. Figueroa, supra, 618 F.2d at 943 (citing United States v. Briggs, 457 F.2d 908, 911 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 337 , 34 L.Ed.2d 251 (1972)), namely, that the probative value of the evidence is “substantially *488 outweighed by the prejudicial tendency of the evidence to have some other adverse effect on the defendant,” id.; see United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309, 317-18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 48…
examined
Cited "see"
Douglas v. United States
(4×)
See, e.g., Laura, 607 F.2d at 57-58 . [28] Second, a trial court decision denying a defendant representation by counsel of choice will be proper only if motivated by certain legitimate concerns: "[t]he only limitation that may be placed on the right to retained counsel of choice is that the client's selection not impede or disrupt the orderly administration of justice." Harling, 387 A.2d at 1104 (citation omitted); see United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83, 86 (1st Cir.) ("the right of an accused to choose his own counsel cannot be insisted upon in a manner that will obstruct reasonable and or…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 , 316 n. 6 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); United States v. West, supra note 10, at 1138. .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore D. Amrine
(2×)
See United States v. Dupree, 553 F.2d 1189, 1192 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Shapiro
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309, 315 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Rita Robinson, Individually and as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits That Were of Joseph Robinson, Deceased v. Rubin Shapiro, Harold Schneider, Irving Newman, Samuel Greenberg and Julius G. Fishman, Doing Business as Village Towers Company (A Partnership), Harold Schneider, Doing Business as Village Towers Company (A Partnership), Third-Party v. Wasoff Contractors, Inc. And Modern Sheet Metal, Inc., Third-Party
See United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309, 315 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert T. Tigges v. Nunzio Cataldo
(2×)
See United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83, 89 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael S. Williams, United States of America v. Hilton L. Smith, Jr., United States of America v. Deffanie J. Morgan, United States of America v. Norman L. Williams, United States of America v. James Michael Ervin
See United States v. Harris, 560 F.2d 148 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1558 , 51 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977), Explained further in United States v. Vella, 562 F.2d 275 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 , 98 S.Ct. 1262 , 55 L.Ed.2d 779 (1978); United States v. Harris, 543 F.2d 1247 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Harrison, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 524 F.2d 421 (1975) 8 Defense counsel was attempting to develop the possibility that Ms. Flack, not Ms. Morgan, was the seller of narcotics and that Ms. Flack's relationship with Officers Clark and Craven…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Harris, 560 F.2d 148 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1558 , 51 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977), explained further in United States v. Vella, 562 F.2d 275 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 , 98 S.Ct. 1262 , 55 L.Ed.2d 779 (1978); United States v. Harris, 543 F.2d 1247 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Harrison, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 524 F.2d 421 (1975). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert James Nogueira
(2×)
See United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83, 89 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew F. Burton
(4×)
See United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83 (1st Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frederick Dean Hamilton
The generally accepted view, therefore, is that evidence of similar offenses for impeachment purposes under Rule 609 should be admitted sparingly if at all. 14 United States v. Sanders, 964 F.2d 295, 297-98 (4th Cir.1992) (quoting Beahm, 664 F.2d at 418-19); see also United States v. Wilson, 556 F.2d 1177 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 (1977).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ferguson
(4×)
See also United States v. Dupree, 553 F.2d 1189 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); McMillian v. State, 83 Wis.2d 239 , 265 N.W.2d 553 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tribble v. United States
See Rice v. United States, D.C.App., 437 A.2d 582 (1981); Wilkerson v. United States, D.C.App., 427 A.2d 923 (1981); see also United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 614 , 54 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howell v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Poulack, 556 F.2d 83, 96 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 613 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Semco Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
U. S. Industries, Inc.
v.
U. S. Industries, Inc.
No. 77-634.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.