green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.1 score
“the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge's exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.
(2×)
But see Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978)." Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60, 64 (6th Cir. 1979) cert. dismissed, 444 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed.2d 415 (1979).
cited
Cited "but see"
William Butler Smith v. Leman Hudson
But see Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Joe Dean Swift (86-1079), James C. Hettmansperger (86-1083)
the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge's exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Czachor
the giving of multiple allen' charges is to be avoided and may constitute reversible error...
cited
Cited "see"
Union Pacific Railroad v. Village of South Barrington
See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) SAL., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp.
See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Melendez
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Melendez
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Windsor Shirt Co. v. New Jersey National Bank
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 515 (2d Cir.1977) (“the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally”), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978); see also In re Japanese Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Marangiello
See, for example, the useful charge quoted in United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 , 511 n.4 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 (1978), where the trial judge admitted testimony that, when arrested, the defendant had a gun of the same caliber as that used in the robbery but refused to permit the gun itself to be put in evidence or shown to the jury.
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. Diaz (In Re Diaz)
See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. den. 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmona
See Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmona
See Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rice
See generally United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514-15 (2d Cir. 1977) (discussion of superior position of trial judge in being able to weigh probative value against prejudicial effect), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation
See Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano and Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 683 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A. Henry TAGER, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514-15 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
However, this case arises under the Commodity Exchange Act and “nothing in the Commodity Exchange Act or its legislative history indicates a Congressional intent that agreements to arbitrate claims arising under the Commodity Exchange Act should not be enforceable under the United States Arbitration Act.” Corcoran v. Shearson/American Express, 596 F.Supp. 1113, 1116 (N.D.Ga.1984); see Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carolyn Lewis
See id. at 88 (quoting United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 515 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Esdaille
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 513-14 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Toro
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 515-516 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 (1978); id. at 518, 522 (Oakes, J., dissenting).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene Mastropieri
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514-15 (2 Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Karen Bags, Inc.
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 518 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama
(2×)
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhn
See generally United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978); United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d 354, 355 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 845 , 89 S.Ct. 129 , 21 L.Ed.2d 116 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Forbes
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 512 (2nd Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Zappola and Robert Melli
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 513 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stankowski
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S. Ct. 1451 , 55 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene Armstrong
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514 (2nd Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
(2×)
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978). 32 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Garris
See United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
See Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., United States v. Robinson , 560 F.2d 507 , 516 (2d Cir. 1977) ("there was little or no need for" trial court to consult with counsel concerning court's response to jury note that revealed vote split), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978) ; see also United States v. Toliver , 330 F.3d 607 , 612 (3rd Cir. 2003) (harmless error analysis applies when trial judge answers jury's note without defendant or his counsel being present).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Feliciano
Ed. 2d 86 (1969); see also United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 517-18 (2d Cir. 1977) [cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S. Ct. 1451 , 55 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pisciotta v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1202 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); Austern v. Chicago Bd. Options Exchange, 716 F.Supp. 121, 124 (S.D.N.Y.1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 882 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 850 , 111 S.Ct. 141 , 112 L.Ed.2d 107 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gentry v. Wallace
See, e.g., Crownover v. Gleichman, 38 Colo. App. 96 , 554 P.2d 313, 316 (1975), aff'd., 194 Colo. 48 , 574 P.2d 497, 499 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); see also, Grimm v. Ford Motor Company, 157 Mich. App. 633 , 403 N.W.2d 482, 485 (1986); Price v. IT & T Corp., 651 F. Supp. 706, 711 (N.D.Miss. 1986) (Lee, J., granting defendant's summary judgment motion); Alexander v. Conveyors and Dumpers, Inc., 731 F.2d 1221, 1228 (5th Cir.1984) (applying Mississippi law and directing a verdict against the plaintiff on statute of limitations grounds).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Metz
See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Williams, Claddis Arrington, Mary Ferguson, A/K/A \Mary Davis\"
See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 512-16 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978); Schiavone Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas J. McElroy Jr., and Robert H. Stedman
See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 514-15 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978); United States v. Dwyer, 539 F.2d 924, 927 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.
See, e.g., Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); Corcoran v. Shearson/American Exp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc, 6-3), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed. 2d 496 (1978) (second deadlock instruction upheld after an 11-1 split for conviction, known to the trial court, continued and a signed note by the holdout juror delivered to the court). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Winkler
State v. Alvord, 47 Idaho 162, 174 , 272 P. 1010, 1013 (1928); see also United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rissew v. Yamaha Motor Co.
The Hague Convention "provides a mechanism by which a plaintiff authorized to serve process under the laws of its country can effect service that will give appropriate notice to the party being served and will not be objectionable to the country in which that party is served” (DeJames v Magnificence Carriers, 654 F2d 280, 288, cert denied 454 US 1085 ; see also, Tamari v Bache & Co. [Lebanon] S.A.L., 431 F Supp 1226, 1228 , affd 565 F2d 1194, cert denied 435 US 905 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zisman v. Sieger
See Shoei Kako Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court, San Francisco, 33 Cal.App.3d 808, 820-22 , 109 Cal.Rptr. 402, 410-12 (1973); see also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L,, 431 F.Supp. 1226, 1228-29 (N.D.Ill.), aff 'd, 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); accord Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 589 F.Supp. 1182, 1206 (D.D.C.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Business Systems, Inc. v. Am International, Inc.
See, e.g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 685 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); H.K.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hagstrom v. Breutman
(2×)
See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (arbitration is proper in a suit based upon alleged fraud in violation of the CEA); Romnes v. Bache & Co., 439 F.Supp. 833 (W.D.Wis.1977) (arbitration is available to resolve disputes concerning a partnership agreement the purpose of which was to trade commodity future contracts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Trion Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 682 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (claim invalid if the device disclosed “constitutes an impermissible enlargement of the original claims, the basis for which was not disclosed therein”); see also Leesona Corp. v. Varta Batteries, Inc., 522 F.Supp. 1304 (S.D.N.Y.1981); P. Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals, § 7.14 (2d Ed.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Furr's Cafeterias, Inc.
Compare Klamm Shell v. Berg, 165 Colo. 540 , 441 P.2d 10 (1968), with Dodge, supra; see, also, Crownover v. Gleichman, 194 Colo. 48 , 574 P.2d 497 (1977), cert denied 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sidney H. Ingbar, M.D. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated
Compare Romnes v. Bache & Co., Inc., supra. See also Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 565 F.2d 1194, 1199 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc.
See, e. g., Faulkner v. Baldwin Piano & Organ Co., 561 F.2d 677, 682 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978) (claim invalid if the device disclosed “constitutes an impermissible enlargement of the original claims, the basis for which was not disclosed therein”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-Mousson
(2×)
See, e. g., Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon), 431 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ill.) aff'd, 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1450 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978). 137 See Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c), cited in full at note 135 supra 138 See, e. g., In re Equitable Plan Co., 185 F.Supp. 57 (S.D.N.Y.), mod. sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tamari, dba Wahbe Tamari & Sons Co.
v.
Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L.
v.
Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L.
No. 77-965.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Supreme Court of New Jersey (1)
C.-A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.