green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“... the ultimate responsibility for a delay caused by government negligence must rest with the state.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Criticized
Sierra Club v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, National Coal Association, Alabama Power Company, Intervenors
Both Pillsbury and Koniag are easily distinguishable on the grounds explained earlier, see text at nn.499ff. supra. Cf. American Public Gas Ass’n v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1070 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978) (during FPC ratesetting proceeding, Congressional subcommittee questioning and criticism of Commissioners did not in this case result in unlawful interference with the Commission’s independence); Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Blum, 458 F.Supp. 650, 662-63 (D.D.C.1978) (during informal rulemaking, communications from Congressmen whi…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jose Jenkins
... the ultimate responsibility for a delay caused by government negligence must rest with the state.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carson
See,- e.g., United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. United States
See United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Woodall v. Pettibone, 465 F.2d 49, 52-53 (4th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 413 U.S. 922 , 93 S.Ct. 3054 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1973); Rogers v. Slaughter, 469 F.2d 1084, 1085 (5th Cir.1972); United States v. Doe, 556 F.2d 391, 393 (6th Cir.1977); Geary v. United States, 901 F.2d 679 (8th Cir.1990); Bromley v. Crisp, 561 F.2d 1351, 1364 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 908 , 98 S.Ct. 1458 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Doe
See Police Comm’r of Boston v. Municipal Court of the Dorchester Dist., supra. See also United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 (1978); Menard v. Mitchell, 430 F.2d 486, 490 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Don Michael Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary, the State of Kansas, Attorney General of Kansas
See Toler v. Wyrick, 563 F.2d 372 , 374 n. 2 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1455 , 55 L.Ed.2d 498 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
John Wayne Brown v. M. Sheffield Ken L. Osborne Valerie Rasheen Roger A. Young Edward C. Morris
See Newell v. Davis, 563 F.2d 123, 124 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 (1978)
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard S. Anderson v. Julian L. Morgan, Director & Unknown John Leonheart Threshold, Inc.
See Newell v. Davis, 563 F.2d 123, 124 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 (1978). 3 The allegation that Anderson was forced to perform work on the director's residence is not as clear-cut an issue, however.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 538 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See American Public Gas Association v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1029 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978). 15 Under this standard, the court requires “the Commission to specify the evidence on which it relied and to explain how that evidence supports the conclusion it reached.” City of Charlottesville v. FERC, 661 F.2d 945 , 950 (D.C.Cir. 1981). 16 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Anr Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Transwestern Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Division of Tenneco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. City Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Madison Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Wisconsin Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Wisconsin Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Wisconsin Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Gas Utilities Company, Intervenors. Trunkline Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Gas Utilities Company, Intervenors. Migc, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Intervenors. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, a Division of Arkla, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., Intervenors. Algonquin Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., Intervenors. Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, Intervenors. Pacific Interstate Offshore Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, Intervenors. Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, Northwest Natural Gas Company, Washington Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, Intervenors. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, a Division of Arkla, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors. Transwestern Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., Intervenors. Migc, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, a Division of Arkla, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See American Public Gas Association v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1029 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978). 15 Under this standard, the court requires "the Commission to specify the evidence on which it relied and to explain how that evidence supports the conclusion it reached." City of Charlottesville v. FERC, 661 F.2d 945 , 950 (D.C.Cir.1981). 16 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Dorn Plastic MacHinery Company v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
Id. at 677-78 n. 15, 101 S.Ct. at 2580 -81 n. 15; see NLRB v. Gray-Grimes Tool Co., 557 F.2d 1233 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and United States of America, Williams Pipe Line Company, Association of Oil Pipelines, Getty Pipeline, Inc., Marathon Pipe Line Company, Phillips Pipe Line Company, Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Association of Oil Pipe Lines and Williams Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Marathon Pipe Line Company, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Mid-America Pipeline Company, Buckeye Pipe Line Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., Hydrocarbon Transportation, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Company, Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Phillips Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Sun Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Arco Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Co., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Intervenors. Mid-America Pipeline Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Co., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Intervenors
Most fundamentally, our task is "to ensure that the [agency] engaged in reasoned decisionmaking." International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donovan, 722 F.2d 795, 815 (D.C.Cir.1983); see American Gas Association v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1029-30 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1457 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978). 43 Agency decisionmaking, of course, must be more than "reasoned" in light of the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Most fundamentally, our task is “to ensure that the [agency] engaged in reasoned decision-making.” International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v. Donovan, 722 F.2d 795, 815 (D.C.Cir.1983); see American Gas Association v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1029-30 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1457 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Richards
See Smith v. Mabry, 564 F.2d 249, 251-52 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978), and cases cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, Broadcast Music, Inc., Party-Respondent. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal
See 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 (4), (5) (1976). 19 We believe that the standard of judicial review enunciated by the late Judge Leventhal in American Public Gas Association v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1028-29 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978), is appropriate to the instant proceeding.
cited
Cited "see"
John Joseph Camillo v. Donald Wyrick, Warden
See Toler v. Wyrick, 563 F.2d 372, 373 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1455 , 55 L.Ed.2d 498 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lead Industries Association, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Bunker Hill Company, Intervenor. St. Joe Minerals Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Bunker Hill Company, Intervenor
See 647 F.2d at 1136 -1137 supra 131 See American Public Gas Ass'n v C, 567 F.2d 1016, 1069-1070 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Duffield v. Charleston Center, Inc., 503 F.2d 512 , 516 (4th Cir. 1974); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. FTC, 366 F.2d 795 , 802 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 932 , 87 S.Ct. 954 , 17 L.Ed.2d 805 (1967); In re United Shoe Machinery Corp., 276 F.2d 77, 79 (1st Cir. 1960); North American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 240 F.2d 867 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 941 , 77 S.Ct. 815 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957); Bower v. East…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
See American Public Gas Ass’n v. FPC, 567 F.2d 1016, 1069-1070 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Duffield v. Charleston Center, Inc., 503 F.2d 512 , 516 (4th Cir. 1974); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. FTC, 366 F.2d 795 , 802 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 932 , 87 S.Ct. 954 , 17 L.Ed.2d 805 (1967); In re United Shoe Machinery Corp., 276 F.2d 77, 79 (1st Cir. 1960); North American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 240 F.2d 867 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 941 , 77 S.Ct. 815 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957); Bower v. Eastern Airlines, 214 F.2d 623 (3d C…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases, 186 U.S.App.D.C. 23, 59-64 , 567 F.2d 1016, 1052-57 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. FPC, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 274, 276 , 551 F.2d 460, 462 (1977); Michigan Wisconsin Gas Pipe Line Co. v. FPC, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 353-54 , 520 F.2d 84, 85-86 (1975); Public Service Com’n, State of N.Y. v. FPC, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 511 F.2d 338 (1975) [hereafter cited as “PSC (Advance Payments) II ”]; Public Service Com’n, State of N.Y. v. FPC, 151 U.S.App.D.C. 307 , 467 F.2d 361 (1972) […
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Journey v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 538 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Morrow v. District of Columbia, 417 F.2d 728, 740 (D.C.Cir. 1969); United States v. Linn, 513 F.2d 925, 927 (10th Cir.1975); Menard v. Saxbe, 498 F.2d 1017, 1023 (D.C.Cir.1974); United States v. McMains, 540 F.2d 387, 389 (8th Cir.1976); Natwig v. Webster, 562 F.Supp. 225, 227 (D.R.I.1983); United States v. Bohr, 406 F.Supp. 1218, 1219 (E.D.Wisc.1976). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. G, 1
See, e.g., United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 538 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Morrow v. District of Columbia, 417 F.2d 728, 740 (D.C.Cir.1969); see also United States v. Linn, 513 F.2d 925, 927 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 836 , 96 S.Ct. 63 , 46 L.Ed.2d 55 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. G
See, e.g., United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 538 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Morrow v. District of Columbia, 417 F.2d 728, 740 (D.C.Cir.1969); see also United States v. Linn, 513 F.2d 925, 927 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 836 , 96 S.Ct. 63 , 46 L.Ed.2d 55 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sadiqq v. Bramlett
See, e.g., United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); United States v. Benlizar, 459 F.Supp. 614 (D.D.C.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Anderson
See also Smith v. Mabry, 564 F.2d 249, 252, 253 (8th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 907 (1978) (speedy trial right not violated despite State’s negligent failure to discover the defendant’s speedy trial demand) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., Council of Public Utility Mailers, Growers & Shippers League of Florida, Associated Third Class Mail Users, American Bankers Association, American Business Press, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Reader's Digest Association, Inc., American Council on Education, United Parcel Service of America, American Newspaper Publishers Association, and the National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., National Foundation March of Dimes, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, (Two Cases). Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service, Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service. Growers and Shippers League of Florida, and Florida Gift Fruit Shippers Association v. United States Postal Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association and National Newspaper Association v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, State of Maine, State of Indiana, State of Florida, State of Rhode Island, State of Washington, and State of Arkansas v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc., States of Utah, Iowa and Illinois, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Readers Digest Association, Inc., Time, Inc. & United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Association of American Publishers, Inc., Mail Order Association of America, Parcel Shippers Association, American Newspaper Publishers Association & National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Postal Service, Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Time Incorporated, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., American Newspaper Publishers Association, National Newspapers Association, State of Connecticut, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors
See also Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases, 186 U.S.App.D.C. 23, 43-45 , 567 F.2d 1016, 1036-38 (1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978) 23 Several petitioners persist in their attack on NAGCP I by asking this court to review the legislative history that was canvassed extensively in that opinion and to declare that NAGCP I was wrongly decided.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service
See also Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases, 186 U.S.App.D.C. 23, 43-45 , 567 F.2d 1016, 1036-38 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 1456 , 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Public Gas Assn.
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Amerada Hess Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Amerada Hess Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
No. 77-695; No. 77-697.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1978.
435 U.S. 907
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.