green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“facts provable under the complaint could well establish that ... proposal was a mere sham”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
facts provable under the complaint could well establish that ... proposal was a mere sham
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanders
See United States v. West, 562 F.2d 375, 377-78 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders
See United States v. West, 562 F.2d 375, 377-78 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Gene Honaker
See alsoUnited States v. Jones, 564 F.2d 1315, 1316 (9th Cir.1977) (concluding it is essential that the stolen firearm be in commerce when the offense is committed). 33 We adopted a position similar to the one taken in Ruffin in United States v. West, 562 F.2d 375 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978) (evidence showed that co-conspirator was "not simply defendant’s errand boy, but that he was privy to terms of [extortionate] extension of credit”). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1 , 8 n. 3 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bourjaily v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F. 2d 1 , and, on rehearing, 561 F. 2d 406 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 922 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Alvin Means v. United States
See United States v. Martorano, 561 F. 2d 406, 408 (CA1 1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 922 (1978); United States v. Cryan, 490 F. Supp. 1234, 1241 (NJ), aff’d, 636 F. 2d 1211 (CA3 1980); 1 J.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Diaz
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 922 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Drougas
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aristedes Drougas, United States of America v. Michael A. Karahalis, United States of America v. Arnold W. Ellis, Jr., United States of America v. Alfonso Defeo, United States of America v. Salvatore Alba
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Martorano, 561 F.2d 406, 408 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
See United States v. Martorano, 561 F.2d 406, 408 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas A. Guerro
See United States v. Martorano, 1 Cir., 1977, 557 F.2d 1, 11 , reh. denied, 561 F.2d 406 , cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 .
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Nighelli
See United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir. 1977), S.C. 561 F.2d 406 , cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scarborough v. State
See, United States v. Rimar, 558 F.2d 1271 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 (1978); United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127 (1973); State v. Watson, La., 397 So.2d 1337 (1981); People v. Brooks, 92 Mich. App. 393 , 285 N.W.2d 307 (1979); Note, Criminal Law — Multiple Jury Joint Trials — On the Joint Trial of Two Defendants, the Empanelling of Two Juries Simultaneously is Permissible, 2 Fordham Urban L.J. 407 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Richman, United States of America v. George Pappas
See United States v. Martorano, 561 F.2d 406, 408 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Earl Jones
See United States v. Cornfeld, 563 F.2d 967, 970 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978); United States v. Perez, 491 F.2d 167, 173 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 858 , 95 S.Ct. 106 , 42 L.Ed.2d 92 (1974); United States v. Memoli, 449 F.2d 160, 160 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 928 , 92 S.Ct. 979 , 30 L.Ed.2d 801 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Anton Richardson, Ralph S. Bowman, Frank Salaman, Robert William Bradford
See United States v. Cornfield, 563 F.2d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldine Elizabeth Hoobler
See note 4, supra. As an alternative argument, the government asks us to uphold the conviction by applying the rationale of United States v. West, 562 F.2d 375 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William John Bourjaily
See also United States v. Martorano, 561 F.2d 406, 408 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978) 5 The Supreme Court denied certiorari in a case presenting this precise issue.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bourjaily
See also United States v. Martorano, 561 F.2d 406, 408 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
Compare Rakas v. Illinois, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1438 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978); Rawlings v. Kentucky, ___ U.S. ___, 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980); United States v. Salvucci, ___ U.S. ___, 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bible
Compare Rakas v. Illinois, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1483 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 . [3] Nevertheless, in State v. Cullotta, 343 So.2d 977 (La.1977), this court recognized that the laudatory deterrent purpose served by the Louisiana exclusionary rule does not mandate that illegally seized evidence cannot be considered in support of probable cause.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alberto Cruz Fontanez
See also United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Martorano
(2×)
See also United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), reh. denied, No. 76-1372 (1st Cir. May 23, 1977) (unpub.) and 561 F.2d 406 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978) (affirming appellant's conviction on direct appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. Thompson
Compare United States v. James, 590 F.2d at 592 (Tjoflat, J. concurring) and United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 12 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978) with United States v. James, 590 F.2d at 581 (Clark, J. for en banc court) and United States v. Bell, 573 F.2d at 1044. 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leon Dudley Noah, Ronnie Kinsey, and Joseph Corre Lamb, Jr., Defendants
(2×)
See also United States v. Martorano, 557 F.2d 1, 8 (CA1 1977), Cert. denied 435 U.S. 922 , 98 S.Ct. 1484 , 55 L.Ed.2d 515 (1978). 33 My review of the entire record convinces me that there is substantial evidence to sustain Noah's conviction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herbert
v.
Lando
v.
Lando
No. 77-1105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.